Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This research is based in part on the thesis of the first author submitted to the Psychology Department of Sapienza University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D course.
We investigated the social use of theory of mind in school-aged children. The expressions Nice Theory of Mind and Nasty Theory of Mind are used to differentiate behaviours requiring a prosocial use and an antisocial use of ToM abilities respectively. Our goals was to investigate whether and how mind reading abilities and empathy affect nice and nasty ToM behaviours. One hundred and ninety-seven children who were fourth and fifth graders took part in this study. Participants were administered stories that assessed cognitive, affective or moral mental state reasoning abilities and they also completed a self-report measure of empathy. Teachers’ rating on children’s prosocial and antisocial behaviours that underpin ToM abilities led us to identify nice and nasty ToM behaviours. We found that children who engage in nasty ToM behaviour showed good abilities to understand others’ thoughts and beliefs. However, children with nice ToM behaviour showed more moral and emotional sensitivity as compared to children who engage in nasty ToM behaviour. Furthermore, the hot component of empathy is stronger in fostering prosocial behaviours and inhibiting antisocial acts than cognitive component.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ali, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). Investigating theory of mind deficits in nonclinical psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 758–762. CrossRef
Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self-efficacy in Greek primary school children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 74(2), 297–309.
Arefi, M. (2010). Present of a casual model for social function based on theory of mind with mediating of Machiavellian beliefs and hot empathy. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 694–697.
Astington, J. W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development (pp. 13–38). New York: Psychology Press.
Badenes, L., Estevan, R., & Bacete, F. (2000). Theory of mind and peer rejection at school. Social Development, 9, 271–283. CrossRef
Barlow, A., Qualter, P., & Stylianou, M. (2010). Relationship between Machiavellianism, emotional intelligence and theory of mind in children. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 78–82. CrossRef
Binnie, L. E. (2005). Tom goes to school: Theory of mind understanding and its link to schooling. Educational and Child Psychology, 22(4), 81–93.
Bonino, S., Lo Coco, A., & Tani, F. (1998). Empatia. Giunti: Processi di condivisione delle emozioni. Firenze.
Capage, L., & Watson, A. C. (2001). Individual differences in theory of mind, aggressive behavior and social skills in young children. Early Education and Development, 12(4), 613–628. CrossRef
Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status of involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18(1), 140–163. CrossRef
Caravita, S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: is ToM involved? Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(1), 138–170. CrossRef
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social-information-processing mechanism in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74–101. CrossRef
Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Review, 3, 71–100. CrossRef
Denham, S. A. (2006). Social-emotional competence as support for school readiness: What is it and how do we assess it? Early Education and Development, 17, 57–89. CrossRef
Diesendruck, G., & Ben-Eliyahu, A. (2006). The relationship among social cognition, peer acceptance and social behavior in Israeli kindergarteners. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(2), 137–147. CrossRef
Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (1981). The Peabody picture vocabulary test- revised. Circle Pines, MN: America Guidance Service.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2006). Prosocial development. In W. Damon, R. M. Lerner (Series Eds.), & N. Eisenberg (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 646–718). New York: Wiley.
Eisenberg, N., & Liew, J. (2009). Empathy. In R. A. Shweder, T. R. Bidell, A. C. Dailey, S. D. Dixon, P. J. Miller, & J. Modell (Eds.), The child: An encyclopedia companion (pp. 316–318). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Feshbach, N. D., Caprara, G. V., Lo Coco, A., Pastorelli, C., Manna, G., & Menzres, J. (1991). Empathy and its correlates: Cross cultural data from Italy. Minneapolis: Eleventh Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Behavioral Development.
Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory of mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merril Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290. CrossRef
Gini, G. (2006). Social cognition and moral cognition in bullying: What’s wrong? Aggressive Behavior, 32, 528–539. CrossRef
Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 129–154. CrossRef
Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). Theory of mind and social impairment in children with conduct disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14(4), 385–398. CrossRef
Hawley, P. H. (2003). Prosocial and coercitive configurations of resource control in early adolescence: A case for the well-adapted Machiavellian. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(3), 279–309. CrossRef
Hoglund, W. L., Lalonde, C. E., & Leadbeater, B. J. (2008). Social-cognitive competence, peer rejection and neglect, and behavioural and emotional problems in middle childhood. Social Development, 17, 528–553. CrossRef
Hughes, C. (2011). Social understanding and social lives. From toddlerhood through to the transition to school. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
Hughes, C., & Leekam, S. (2004). What are the links between ToM and social relationship? Review, reflections and the new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13(4), 590–619. CrossRef
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Examining the relationship between low empathy and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 32(6), 540–550. CrossRef
Liddle, B., & Nettle, D. (2006). Higher-order theory of mind and social competence in school-age children. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 4(3–4), 231–244. CrossRef
Lyons, M., Caldwell, T., & Shultz, S. (2010). Mind-reading and manipulation: Is machiavellianism related to theory of mind? Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, 8(3), 261–274. CrossRef
Marshall, L. E., & Marshall, W. L. (2011). Empathy and antisocial behaviour. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 22(5), 742–759. CrossRef
Renouf, A., Brendgen, M., Parent, S., Vitaro, F., Zelazo, P. D., Boivin, M., et al. (2010). Relations between theory of mind and indirect and physical aggression in kindergarten: Evidence of the moderating role of prosocial behaviors. Social Development, 19(3), 535–555. CrossRef
Ronald, A., Happé, F., Hughes, C., & Plomin, R. (2005). Nice and nasty theory of mind in preschool children: Nature and nurture. Social Development, 14(4), 664–684. CrossRef
Slaughter, V. (2011). Early adoption of machiavellian attitudes: Implications for children’s interpersonal relationships. In T. Barry, P. Kerig, & K. Stellwagen (Eds.), Narcissism and machiavellianism in youth: Implications for the development of adaptive and maladaptive behaviour (pp. 177–192). Washington, DC: APA Books. CrossRef
Slaughter, V., Dennis, M. J., & Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 545–564. CrossRef
Stavrinides, P., Georgiou, S., & Theofanous, V. (2010). Bullying and empathy: A short-term longitudinal investigation. Educational Psychology, 30(7), 793–802. CrossRef
Stella, G., Pizzoli, C., & Tressoldi, P. E. (2000). Peabody. Test di vocabolario recettivo. Torino: Omega Edizioni.
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and theory of mind: A critique of social deficit view of antisocial behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127. CrossRef
Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450. CrossRef
Warden, D., & Mackinnon, S. (2003). Prosocial children, bullies, and victims: An investigation of their sociometric status, empathy and problem-solving strategies. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 367–385. CrossRef
- Mind Reading Skills and Empathy: Evidence for Nice and Nasty ToM Behaviours in School-Aged Children
- Springer US