Uitgave 5/2023
Special Section: Methodologies and Considerations for Meaningful Change
Inhoudsopgave (27 Artikelen)
Introduction to the special section: “Methodologies and considerations for meaningful change”
Andrew Trigg, William R. Lenderking, Jan R. Boehnke
Common methods of determining meaningful change in clinical practice: implications for precision patient-reported outcomes
Salene M. W. Jones, Aliana Gaffney, Joseph M. Unger
The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments
Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Geoffrey R. Norman
How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales
Kim Cocks, Jacqueline Buchanan
How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold
Pip Griffiths, Joel Sims, Abi Williams, Nicola Williamson, David Cella, Elaine Brohan, Kim Cocks
Correction: How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold
Pip Griffiths, Joel Sims, Abi Williams, Nicola Williamson, David Cella, Elaine Brohan, Kim Cocks
Establishing thresholds for meaningful within-individual change using longitudinal item response theory
Jakob Bue Bjorner, Berend Terluin, Andrew Trigg, Jinxiang Hu, Keri J. S. Brady, Pip Griffiths
Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions
Shanshan Qin, Lauren Nelson, Nicole Williams, Valerie Williams, Randall Bender, Lori McLeod
Transitions in depression: if, how, and when depressive symptoms return during and after discontinuing antidepressants
Arnout C. Smit, Evelien Snippe, Laura F. Bringmann, H. J. Rogier Hoenders, Marieke Wichers
“From Where I Stand”: using multiple anchors yields different benchmarks for meaningful improvement and worsening in the rheumatoid arthritis flare questionnaire (RA-FQ)
Susan J. Bartlett, Vivian P. Bykerk, Orit Schieir, Marie-France Valois, Janet E. Pope, Gilles Boire, Carol Hitchon, Glen Hazlewood, Louis Bessette, Edward Keystone, Carter Thorne, Diane Tin, Clifton O. Bingham III, M Baron, I Colmegna, S Fallavollita, D Haaland, B Haraoui, S Jamal, R Joshi, B Nair, P Panopoulos, L Rubin, E Villeneuve, M Zummer
Using qualitative methods to establish the clinically meaningful threshold for treatment success in alopecia areata
Kathleen W. Wyrwich, Helen Kitchen, Sarah Knight, Natalie V. J. Aldhouse, Jake Macey, Natasha Mesinkovska, Justin M. Ko, Brett A. King
A qualitative study to examine meaningful change in physical function associated with weight-loss
Jiat-Ling Poon, Chris Marshall, Chloe Johnson, Hannah C. Pegram, Maile Hunter, Hongjun Kan, Nadia N. Ahmad
Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient-reported outcomes
John Devin Peipert, Ron D. Hays, David Cella
Correction: Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient‑reported outcomes
John Devin Peipert, Ron D. Hays, David Cella
Identifying meaningful change on PROMIS short forms in cancer patients: a comparison of item response theory and classic test theory frameworks
Minji K. Lee, John D. Peipert, David Cella, Kathleen J. Yost, David T. Eton, Paul J. Novotny, Jeff A. Sloan, Amylou C. Dueck
Measuring individual true change with PROMIS using IRT-based plausible values
Emily H. Ho, Jay Verkuilen, Felix Fischer
Comparison of raw and regression approaches to capturing change on patient-reported outcome measures
David A. Andrae, Brandon Foster, J. Devin Peipert
Inferring meaningful change in quality of life with posterior predictive distribution: an alternative to standard error of measurement
Yuelin Li
Likely change indexes do not always index likely change; moreover, there is no need for them
Berend Terluin
Minimally important changes do not always reflect minimally important change; moreover, there is no need for them
John Devin Peipert, David Cella, Ron D. Hays
Patient-centered care in Coronary Heart Disease: what do you want to measure? A systematic review of reviews on patient-reported outcome measures
Yolanda Pardo, Olatz Garin, Cristina Oriol, Víctor Zamora, Aida Ribera, Montserrat Ferrer
Fasting during cancer treatment: a systematic review
U. Drexler, J. Dörfler, J. von Grundherr, N. Erickson, J. Hübner
Lived experience of patients with sleep apnea: a systematic synthesis of qualitative evidence
Ai-Ping Chua, Zhi Yi Soh, Shaffinaz Abd Rahman, Nan Luo, Shefaly Shorey
Evaluating health-related quality of life and subjective wellbeing among infertility patients: a cross-sectional study in mainland China
Zhao Shi, Hongwei Nie, Ling Geng, Xuewen Wang, Gang Chen, Shunping Li
Do mothers or females without children have better health-related quality of life across their reproductive years?
Chuyao Jin, Leigh R. Tooth, Xiaolin Xu, Gita D. Mishra
Pre-treatment quality of life in patients with salivary gland cancer in comparison with those of head and neck cancer patients
Danbee Kang, Eunhye Kim, Nayeon Choi, HeeJung Kim, Juhee Cho, Han-Sin Jeong
Predictors of change in asthma-related quality of life: a longitudinal real-life study in adult asthmatics
Gilles Louis, Benoit Pétré, Florence Schleich, Halehsadat Nekoee Zahrei, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Monique Henket, Virginie Paulus, Françoise Guissard, Michèle Guillaume, Renaud Louis