Top

Gepubliceerd in:

21-11-2022 | Correction

Correction: Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient‑reported outcomes

Auteurs: John Devin Peipert, Ron D. Hays, David Cella

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 5/2023

Excerpt

In the original publication of the article, a source of funding that was not appropriate to this work was inadvertently included in the funding section. The correct funding information is provided below. …

vorige artikel Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient-reported outcomes

volgende artikel Identifying meaningful change on PROMIS short forms in cancer patients: a comparison of item response theory and classic test theory frameworks

Titel: Correction: Likely change indexes improve estimates of individual change on patient‑reported outcomes
Auteurs: John Devin Peipert
Ron D. Hays
David Cella
Publicatiedatum: 21-11-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 5/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03296-8

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Excerpt

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2023

Predictors of change in asthma-related quality of life: a longitudinal real-life study in adult asthmatics

Lived experience of patients with sleep apnea: a systematic synthesis of qualitative evidence

Fasting during cancer treatment: a systematic review

Correction: How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold

Introduction to the special section: “Methodologies and considerations for meaningful change”

Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions