Top

Gepubliceerd in:

22-08-2019 | Empirical Research

Friendship Network Dynamics of Aggressive and Rule-Breaking Antisocial Behaviors in Adolescence

Auteurs: Olga Kornienko, Marissa Davila, Carlos E. Santos

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 10/2019

Abstract

Growing evidence reveals heterogeneity in antisocial behavior and urges the need to distinguish between aggressive and nonaggressive rule-breaking behaviors. This study characterized how aggression and rule-breaking behaviors shaped peer selection and influence. Using a longitudinal social network modeling approach, these questions were addressed in a sample of 1034 ethno-racially diverse early adolescents (49.52% females, Mage = 12.1), who were assessed in fall and spring of the same year. The results showed no evidence of peer selection on aggressive and rule-breaking behaviors, and significant peer influence on aggressive behavior only. Rule-breaking also forecasted a decreased susceptibility to peer influence on aggressive behavior. The findings expanded our knowledge about complex pathways through which heterogeneity in antisocial behavior is reciprocally related to friendship networks.

vorige artikel Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents’ Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations

volgende artikel Ulf Schütze: Language Learning and the Brain: Lexical Processing in Second Language Acquisition

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Allen, J. P., Porter, M. R., & McFarland, F. C. (2006). Leaders and followers in adolescent close friendships: susceptibility to peer influence as a predictor of risky behavior, friendship instability, and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 18, 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579406060093.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Allen, J. P., Schad, M. M., Oudekerk, B., & Chango, J. (2014). What ever happened to the “cool” kids? Long‐term sequelae of early adolescent pseudomature behavior. Child development, 85, 1866–1880. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12250.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Anderson, C., Hildreth, J., & Howland, L. (2015). Is the desire for status a fundamental human motive? A review of the empirical literature. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 574–601. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038781.CrossRefPubMed

Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.CrossRefPubMed

Blakemore, S. J., & Mills, K. L. (2014). Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing? Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115202.CrossRefPubMed

Brechwald, W. A., & Prinstein, M. J. (2011). Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell), 21, 166–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010.00721.x.CrossRef

Brown, B. B., & Larson, J. (2009). Peer Relationships in Adolescence. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds), Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, (pp. 74–103). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Burt, S. (2012). How do we optimally conceptualize the heterogeneity within antisocial behavior? An argument for aggressive versus non-aggressive behavioral dimensions. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(4), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.006.CrossRefPubMed

Burt, S., Hyde, L., Frick, P., Jaffee, S., Shaw, D., & Tremblay, R. (2018). Commentary: childhood conduct problems are a public health crisis and require resources: a commentary on Rivenbark et al. [Rivenbark, J. G., 2018]. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(6), 711–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12930.CrossRefPubMed

Burt, S., Rescorla, L., Achenbach, T., Ivanova, M., Almqvist, F., Begovac, I., & Verhulst, F. (2015). The association between aggressive and non-aggressive antisocial problems as measured with the Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment: a study of 27,861 parent–adolescent dyads from 25 societies. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.036.CrossRef

Cillessen, A. H. N., Mayeux, L., Ha, T., de Bruyn, E. H., & LaFontana, K. M. (2014). Aggressive effects of prioritizing popularity in early adolescence. Aggressive Behavior, 40(3), 204–213. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21518.CrossRefPubMed

Crone, E., & Dahl, R. (2012). Understanding adolescence as a period of social–affective engagement and goal flexibility. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3313.

Dijkstra, J. K., Kretschmer, T., Pattiselanno, K., Franken, A., Harakeh, Z., Vollebergh, W., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Explaining adolescents’ delinquency and substance use: a test of the maturity gap: The SNARE study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 747–767. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815582249.CrossRef

Dishion, T. J. (2016). An evolutionary framework for understanding coercion and aggression. In T. J. Dishion & J. Snyder (Eds), The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics, (pp. 53–68). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Dishion, T. J., Patterson, G. R., & Griesler, P. C. (1994). Peer adaptations in the development of antisocial behavior. In L. R. Huesmann (Ed.), Aggressive behavior. The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology. Boston, MA: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9116-7_4.

Dishion, T., Patterson, G., Stoolmiller, M., & Skinner, M. (1991). Family, school, and behavioral antecedents to early adolescent involvement with antisocial peers. Developmental Psychology, 27(1), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.27.1.172.CrossRef

Dishion, T. J., Piehler, T. F., & Myers, M. W. (2008). Dynamics and ecology of adolescent peer influence. In Duke Series in Child Development and Public Policy. Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents (pp. 72–93). New York: The Guilford Press.

Dishion, T., & Tipsord, J. (2011). Peer contagion in child and adolescent social and emotional development. Annual Review of Psychology, 62(1), 189–214. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100412.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(96)80023-2.CrossRef

Eccles, J. S., & Barber, B. (1990). Risky Behavior Measure. Unpublished scale, University of Michigan.

Ettekal, I., & Ladd, G. (2015). Costs and benefits of children’s physical and relational aggression trajectories on peer rejection, acceptance, and friendships: variations by aggression subtypes, gender, and age. Developmental Psychology, 51(12), 1756–1770. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000057.CrossRefPubMed

Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2018). Selection and influence: a meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-018-9384-y.

Gifford-Smith, M. E., & Brownell, C. A. (2003). Childhood peer relationships: social acceptance, friendships, and peer networks. Journal of School Psychology, 41, 235–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(03)00048-7.CrossRef

Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K., Dishion, T., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Greenberg, M. T., & Lippold, M. A. (2013). Promoting healthy outcomes among youth with multiple risks: innovative approaches. Annual Review of Public Health, 34, 253–270. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031811-124619.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hasking, P. A., Scheier, L. M., & ben Abdallah, A. (2011). The three latent classes of adolescent delinquency and the risk factors for membership in each class. Aggressive Behavior, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20365.CrossRefPubMed

Hawley, P. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19(1), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1998.0470.CrossRef

Heerde, J., & Hemphill, S. (2018). Examination of associations between informal help-seeking behavior, social support, and adolescent psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Developmental Review, 47, 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2017.10.001.CrossRef

Huisman, M., & Steglich, C. (2008). Treatment of non-response in longitudinal network studies. Social Networks, 30, 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.CrossRef

Kiesner, J., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2004). “Very important persons” in adolescence: going beyond in-school, single friendships in the study of peer homophily. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.06.007.CrossRefPubMed

Klahr, A., & Burt, S. (2014). Elucidating the etiology of individual differences in parenting: a meta-analysis of behavioral genetic research. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2), 544–586. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034205.CrossRefPubMed

Kornienko, O., Dishion, T. J., & Ha, T. (2018). Peer network dynamics and the amplification of antisocial to violent behavior among young adolescents in public middle schools. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 26, 21–30.CrossRef

Kornienko, O., Ha, T., & Dishion, T. J. (2019). Dynamic pathways between rejection and antisocial behavior in peer networks: Update and test of confluence model. Development and Psychopathology, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579418001645.

LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: a multimethod assessment. Developmental psychology, 38(5), 635 https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.5.635.CrossRefPubMed

Larson, R. (2001). How U.S. children and adolescents spend time: what it does (and doesn’t) tell us about their development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(5), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00139.CrossRef

Laursen, B. (2018). Peer Influence. In W. M. Bukowski, B. Laursen & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups. 2nd edition (pp. 447–470). NY: Guilford Press.

Marsden, P. V. (2005). Recent developments in network measurement. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18(1), 49–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00550.x.CrossRef

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., Cook, J., & McPherson, M. (2001). Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRef

Miller-Johnson, S., Coie, J., Maumary-Gremaud, A., & Bierman, K. (2002). Peer rejection and aggression and early starter models of conduct disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015198612049.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Moffitt, T. (1993). Adolescence-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100(4), 674–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674.CrossRefPubMed

Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Silva, P., & Stanton, W. (1996). Childhood-onset versus adolescent-onset antisocial conduct problems in males: Natural history from ages 3 to 18 years. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 399–424. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400007161.CrossRef

Molano, A., Jones, S., Brown, J., & Aber, J. (2013). Selection and socialization of aggressive and prosocial behavior: the moderating role of social‐cognitive processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23(3), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12034.CrossRef

Patterson, G. R. (2016). Coercion theory: The study of change. In T. J. Dishion & J. J. Snyder (Eds), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of coercive relationship dynamics (pp. 7–22). New York: Oxford University Press.

Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310–342.

Prinstein, M. J., & Giletta, M. (2016). Peer relations and developmental psychopathology. Developmental Psychopathology, 1–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125556.devpsy112.

Rivenbark, J., Odgers, C., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., Houts, R., Poulton, R., & Moffitt, T. (2018). The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 59(6), 703–710. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12850.CrossRefPubMed

Ripley, R., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2019). Manual for SIENA version 4.0. Oxford: the University of Oxford, Department of Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~snijders/siena/.

Rodkin, P., Farmer, T., Pearl, R., & Van Acker, R. (2000). Heterogeneity of popular boys: antisocial and prosocial configurations. Developmental Psychology, 36(1), 14–24.CrossRefPubMed

Rudolph, K. D., Lansford, J. E., & Rodkin, P. C. (2016). Interpersonal theories of developmental psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti (Ed.), Developmental Psychopathology 3rd ed. (pp. 1–69). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. (2006). Likeable versus popular: distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(4), 305–314.CrossRef

Sentse, M., Dijkstra, J. K., Salmivalli, C., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2013). The dynamics of friendships and victimization in adolescence: a longitudinal social network perspective. Aggressive Behavior, 39(3), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21469.CrossRefPubMed

Sijtsema, J. J., & Lindenberg, S. M. (2018). Peer influence in the development of adolescent antisocial behavior: advances from dynamic social network studies. Developmental Review, 50, 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2018.08.002.CrossRef

Sijtsema, J. J., Lindenberg, S. M., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Do they get what they want or are they stuck with what they can get? Testing homophily against default selection for friendships of highly aggressive boys. The TRAILS study. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9402-5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sijtsema, J., Rambaran, A., & Ojanen, T. (2013). Overt and relational victimization and adolescent friendships: selection, de-selection, and social influence. Social Influence, 8(2-3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.739097.CrossRef

Snijders, T., Steglich, C., & Schweinberger, M. (2007). Modeling the Coevolution of Networks and Behavior. In Kvan Montfort, J. Oud & A. Satorra (Eds.), Longitudinal models in the behavioral and related sciences (pp. 41–71). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. E. G. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32, 44–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004.CrossRef

Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., McEachern, A., Barner, S., Provines, J., & Johnson, K. (2008). Peer deviancy training and peer coercion–rejection: dual processes associated with early onset conduct problem. Child Development, 79, 252–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01124.x.CrossRefPubMed

Steglich, C., Snijders, T., & Pearson, M. (2010). Dynamic networks and behavior: separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology, 40, 329–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9531.2010.01225.x.CrossRef

Steinberg, L. (2008). A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Review, 28, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002.CrossRefPubMed

Steinberg, L., & Monahan, K. C. (2007). Age differences in resistance to peer influence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1531.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Tremblay, R. (2010). Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: the “original sin” hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51(4), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.x.CrossRefPubMed

Van Zalk, N., & Van Zalk, M. (2015). The importance of perceived care and connectedness with friends and parents for adolescent social anxiety. Journal of Personality, 83(3), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12108.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Friendship Network Dynamics of Aggressive and Rule-Breaking Antisocial Behaviors in Adolescence
Auteurs: Olga Kornienko
Marissa Davila
Carlos E. Santos
Publicatiedatum: 22-08-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01109-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2019

Cultivating Adolescents’ Academic Identity: Ascertaining the Mediating Effects of Motivational Beliefs Between Classroom Practices and Mathematics Identity

Defend, Stand By, or Join In?: The Relative Influence of Moral Identity, Moral Judgment, and Social Self-Efficacy on Adolescents’ Bystander Behaviors in Bullying Situations

Dual Identity Development and Adjustment in Muslim Minority Adolescents

Factors Associated with Academic Achievement for Sexual and Gender Minority and Heterosexual Cisgender Students: Implications from a Nationally Representative Study

Loring Paul Jones: Life After Foster Care: Improving Outcomes for Former Foster Youth

The Interplay of Adolescents’ Aggression and Victimization with Friendship and Antipathy Networks within an Educational Prosocial Intervention