Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2016

02-07-2015 | Original Article

Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space

Auteurs: Nathalie Le Bigot, Marc Grosjean

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

While some studies have found that attentional orienting is altered in perihand space, most have not. One reason for such discrepancies may be related to the types of cues (uninformative and informative) that have been used, as they are known to induce different types of shifts of attention (exogenous and endogenous, respectively). To systematically address this question, two experiments were performed in which an uninformative peripheral cue (Experiment 1) or an informative central cue (Experiment 2) preceded a peripheral target with a short (100–150 ms) stimulus-onset asynchrony. Participants performed the task with their left hand, right hand, both hands, or no hands near the display. Cueing effects were obtained in both experiments, but they were only modulated by hand position in Experiment 1, with larger effects observed in the right- and both-hand conditions. These findings suggest that exogenous attention shifts are affected by hand proximity, while endogenous shifts are not.
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107(3), 1035–1047.CrossRefPubMed Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107(3), 1035–1047.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bridgeman, B., & Tseng, P. (2011). Embodied cognition and the perception-action link. Physics of Life Reviews, 8, 73–85.CrossRefPubMed Bridgeman, B., & Tseng, P. (2011). Embodied cognition and the perception-action link. Physics of Life Reviews, 8, 73–85.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., & Witt, J. K. (2013). The world within reach: effects of hand posture and tool use on visual cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 38–44.CrossRef Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., & Witt, J. K. (2013). The world within reach: effects of hand posture and tool use on visual cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 38–44.CrossRef
go back to reference Chica, A. B., Bartolomeo, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogeneous and exogeneous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed Chica, A. B., Bartolomeo, P., & Lupiáñez, J. (2013). Two cognitive and neural systems for endogeneous and exogeneous spatial attention. Behavioural Brain Research, 237, 107–123.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chica, A. B., Martín-Arévalo, E., Botta, F., & Lupiáñez, J. (2014). The spatial orienting paradigm: how to design and interpret spatial attention experiments. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 40, 35–51.CrossRefPubMed Chica, A. B., Martín-Arévalo, E., Botta, F., & Lupiáñez, J. (2014). The spatial orienting paradigm: how to design and interpret spatial attention experiments. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 40, 35–51.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Chica, A. B., Sanabria, D., Lupiáñez, J., & Spence, C. (2007). Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 353–364.CrossRefPubMed Chica, A. B., Sanabria, D., Lupiáñez, J., & Spence, C. (2007). Comparing intramodal and crossmodal cuing in the endogenous orienting of spatial attention. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 353–364.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: a simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.
go back to reference Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Gaverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: the effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 555–562.CrossRef Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Gaverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: the effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38(5), 555–562.CrossRef
go back to reference Derrington, A. M., & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque. Journal of Physiology, 357, 219–240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Derrington, A. M., & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque. Journal of Physiology, 357, 219–240.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Dufour, A., & Touzalin, P. (2008). Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Experimental Brain Research, 190, 91–98.CrossRefPubMed Dufour, A., & Touzalin, P. (2008). Improved visual sensitivity in the perihand space. Experimental Brain Research, 190, 91–98.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 415–422.CrossRefPubMed Geffen, G., Bradshaw, J. L., & Wallace, G. (1971). Interhemispheric effects on reaction time to verbal and nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 415–422.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., Ardron, J., & Pratt, J. (2014). Reduced visual feature binding in the near-hand space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1308–1317.CrossRef Gozli, D. G., Ardron, J., & Pratt, J. (2014). Reduced visual feature binding in the near-hand space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1308–1317.CrossRef
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124, 244–250.CrossRefPubMed Gozli, D. G., West, G. L., & Pratt, J. (2012). Hand position alters vision by biasing processing through different visual pathways. Cognition, 124, 244–250.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Klein, R. M. (2009). On the control of attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 240–252.CrossRefPubMed Klein, R. M. (2009). On the control of attention. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 240–252.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253–270.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240(4853), 740–749.CrossRefPubMed Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240(4853), 740–749.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Llyod, D. M., Azanon, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2010). Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space. Brain and Cognition, 73, 102–109.CrossRef Llyod, D. M., Azanon, E., & Poliakoff, E. (2010). Right hand presence modulates shifts of exogenous visuospatial attention in near perihand space. Brain and Cognition, 73, 102–109.CrossRef
go back to reference McAuliffe, J., Johnson, M. J., Weaver, B., Deller-Quinn, M., & Hansen, S. (2013). Body position differentially influences responses to exogenous and endogenous cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1342–1346.CrossRef McAuliffe, J., Johnson, M. J., Weaver, B., Deller-Quinn, M., & Hansen, S. (2013). Body position differentially influences responses to exogenous and endogenous cues. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1342–1346.CrossRef
go back to reference Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathway? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.CrossRefPubMed Merigan, W. H., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (1993). How parallel are the primate visual pathway? Annual Review of Neuroscience, 16, 369–402.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moscovitch, M., & Catlin, J. (1970). Interhemispheric transmission of information: measurement in normal man. Psychonomic Science, 18, 211–213.CrossRef Moscovitch, M., & Catlin, J. (1970). Interhemispheric transmission of information: measurement in normal man. Psychonomic Science, 18, 211–213.CrossRef
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburg inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRefPubMed Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburg inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.CrossRefPubMed Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 236–245.CrossRef Reed, C. L., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72(1), 236–245.CrossRef
go back to reference Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166–177.PubMed Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 166–177.PubMed
go back to reference Tseng, P., Bridgeman, B., & Juan, C. (2012). Take the matter into your own hands: a brief review of the effect of nearby-hands on visual processing. Vision Research, 72, 74–77.CrossRefPubMed Tseng, P., Bridgeman, B., & Juan, C. (2012). Take the matter into your own hands: a brief review of the effect of nearby-hands on visual processing. Vision Research, 72, 74–77.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Exogenous and endogenous shifts of attention in perihand space
Auteurs
Nathalie Le Bigot
Marc Grosjean
Publicatiedatum
02-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0680-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2016

Psychological Research 4/2016 Naar de uitgave