Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
We provide behavioral evidence that the human motor system is involved in the perceptual decision processes of skilled performers, directly linking prediction accuracy to the (in)ability of the motor system to activate in a response-specific way. Experienced and non-experienced dart players were asked to predict, from temporally occluded video sequences, the landing position of a dart thrown previously by themselves (self) or another (other). This prediction task was performed while additionally performing (a) an action-incongruent secondary motor task (right arm force production), (b) a congruent secondary motor task (mimicking) or (c) an attention-matched task (tone-monitoring). Non-experienced dart players were not affected by any of the secondary task manipulations, relative to control conditions, yet prediction accuracy decreased for the experienced players when additionally performing the force-production, motor task. This interference effect was present for ‘self’ as well as ‘other’ decisions, reducing the accuracy of experienced participants to a novice level. The mimicking (congruent) secondary task condition did not interfere with (or facilitate) prediction accuracy for either group. We conclude that visual–motor experience moderates the process of decision making, such that a seemingly visual–cognitive prediction task relies on activation of the motor system for experienced performers. This fits with a motor simulation account of action prediction in sports and other tasks, and alerts to the specificity of these simulative processes.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Abernethy, B., Farrow, D., Gorman, A. D., & Mann, D. (2012). Anticipatory behaviour and expert performance. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 288–305). London: Routledge.
Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89, 369–406. CrossRef
Cooper, L., & Podgorny, P. (1976). Mental transformations and visual comparison processes: effects of complexity and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 503–514. PubMed
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2, 493–501. CrossRef
Gobet, F., & Jackson, S. (2002). In search of templates. Cognitive Systems Research, 3, 35–44. CrossRef
Hohmann, T., Troje, N. F., Olmos, A., & Munzert, J. (2011). The influence of motor expertise and motor experience on action and actor recognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23, 403–415. CrossRef
Ikegami, T., & Ganesh, G. (2014). Watching novice action degrades expert motor performance: causation between action production and outcome prediction of observed actions by humans. Scientific Reports, 4, A6989. CrossRef
Jackson, R. C., Abernethy, B., & Wernhart, S. (2009). Sensitivity to fine-grained and coarse visual information: the effect of blurring on anticipation skill. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 40, 461–475.
Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103–109. CrossRef
Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 456–465. PubMed
Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 210–220. PubMed
Mann, D. T., Williams, A. M., Ward, P., & Janelle, C. M. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: a meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 29, 457–478. PubMed
Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129–154. CrossRef
Prinz, W., & Hommel, B. (2002). Common mechanisms in perception and action: Attention and performance XIX. New York: Oxford University Press.
Ruby, P., & Decety, J. (2003). What you believe versus what you think they believe: a neuroimaging study of conceptual perspective-taking. European Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2475–2480. CrossRef
Shepard, R. N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Springer, A., Parkinson, J., & Prinz, W. (2013b). Action simulation: time course and representational mechanisms. Frontiers in Cognition, 4, 1–20.
Starkes, J. L. (1987). Skill in field hockey: the nature of the cognitive advantage. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 146–160.
Williams, A. M., & Davids, K. (1995). Declarative knowledge in sport: a by-product of experience or a characteristic of expertise? Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17, 259–275.
Williams, A. M., & Davids, K. (1998). Perceptual expertise in sport: Research, theory and practice. In H. Steinberg, I. Cockerill, & A. Dewey (Eds.), What sport psychologists do (pp. 48–57). Leicester: British Psychological Society.
Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2003). Developing perceptual expertise in sport. In J. L. Starkes & K. A. Ericsson (Eds.), Expert performance in sports: Advances in research on sport expertise (pp. 220–249). Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics.
Williams, A. M., & Ward, P. (2007). Perceptual-cognitive expertise in sport: Exploring new horizons. In G. Tenenabum & R. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 203–223). New York: Wiley.
Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 358, 593–602. CrossRef
Wuhr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260–1270. PubMed
- An action-incongruent secondary task modulates prediction accuracy in experienced performers: evidence for motor simulation
Keith R. Lohse
Nicola J. Hodges
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg