Top

Gepubliceerd in:

30-11-2023 | Empirical Research

Different Ways to Defend Victims of Bullying: Defending Profiles and Their Associations with Adolescents’ Victimization Experiences and Depressive Symptoms

Auteurs: Guomin Jin, Xiaohua Bian, Tong Zhou, Junsheng Liu

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 3/2024

Abstract

Adolescents use various strategies to help their victimized peers during bullying episodes. However, prior research has primarily adopted a variable-centered approach that examines the effect of each defending strategies separately and does not address whether there were different types of defenders who exhibit specific combinations of defending strategies and how these profiles related to youth’s adjustment outcomes. Using latent profile analysis, this study identified defending profiles among a sample of Chinese adolescents (N = 1618, M_age = 13.81, SD_age = 0.94, 42% girls) and examined whether these profiles differ on victimization experiences and depressive symptoms. The results yielded four defending profiles: nonaggressive defenders (15%), aggressive defenders (7%), average defenders (54%), and infrequent defenders (24%). Aggressive defenders and infrequent defenders exhibited the highest levels of self-reported victimization and depressive symptoms, whereas nonaggressive defenders demonstrated the lowest. There were no statistical profile differences in peer-reported victimization. Findings suggest that investigating the heterogeneity of youth using defending strategies is important for understanding whether defending actually puts youth at increased risk for negative adjustment.

vorige artikel Joint Developmental Trajectories of Novelty and Usefulness in Chinese Children’s Creativity

volgende artikel Narcissism Moderates the Association Between Autonomy-Supportive Parenting and Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model. Mplus Web Notes, 21(2), 1–22.

Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B Methodological, 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x.MathSciNetCrossRef

Capaldi, D. M. (1991). Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: I. Familial factors and general adjustment at Grade 6. Development and Psychopathology, 3(3), 277–300. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005319.CrossRef

Capaldi, D. M. (1992). Co-occurrence of conduct problems and depressive symptoms in early adolescent boys: II. A 2-year follow-up at Grade 8. Development and Psychopathology, 4(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579400005605.CrossRef

Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (1995). Peer processes in bullying and victimization: An observational study. Exceptionality Education Canada, 5, 81–95.

Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8), 644–658. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644.CrossRefPubMed

Eisenberg, N., Spinrad, T. L., & Eggum, N. D. (2010). Emotion-related self-regulation and its relation to children’s maladjustment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 6, 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131208.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fendrich, M., Weissman, M. M., & Warner, V. (1990). Screening for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: Validating the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Children. American Journal of Epidemiology, 131(3), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115529.CrossRefPubMed

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2021). What works in anti-bullying programs? Analysis of effective intervention components. Journal of School Psychology, 85, 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.12.002.CrossRefPubMed

Garandeau, C. F., Vermande, M. M., Reijntjes, A. H., & Aarts, E. (2022). Classroom bullying norms and peer status: Effects on victim-oriented and bully-oriented defending. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 46(5), 401–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419894722.CrossRef

Hawkins, D. L., Pepler, D. J., & Craig, W. M. (2001). Naturalistic observations of peer interventions in bullying. Social Development, 10(4), 512–527. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00178.CrossRef

Huang, Y., Bullock, A., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Xu, G., & Sang, B. (2022). Co-rumination with friends exacerbates association between peer victimization and adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 80, 101410 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2022.101410.CrossRef

Huitsing, G., Snijders, T. A. B., Van Duijn, M. A. J., & Veenstra, R. (2014). Victims, bullies, and their defenders: A longitudinal study of the coevolution of positive and negative networks. Development and Psychopathology, 26(3), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579414000297.CrossRefPubMed

Jouriles, E. N., Rosenfield, D., McDonald, R., & Mueller, V. (2014). Child involvement in interparental conflict and child adjustment problems: A longitudinal study of violent families. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 42, 693–704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-013-9821-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lambe, L. J., Cioppa, V. D., Hong, I. K., & Craig, W. M. (2019). Standing up to bullying: A social ecological review of peer defending in offline and online contexts. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2018.05.007.CrossRef

Lambe, L. J., & Craig, W. M. (2020). Peer defending as a multidimensional behavior: Development and validation of the Defending Behaviors Scale. Journal of School Psychology, 78, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2019.12.001.CrossRefPubMed

Lambe, L. J., Hudson, C. C., Craig, W. M., & Pepler, D. J. (2017). Does defending come with a cost? Examining the psychosocial correlates of defending behaviour among bystanders of bullying in a Canadian sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 65, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.01.012.CrossRef

Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. https://doi.org/10.2307/2290157.MathSciNetCrossRef

Liu, J., Bowker, J. C., Coplan, R. J., Yang, P., Li, D., & Chen, X. (2019). Evaluating links among shyness, peer relations, and internalizing problems in Chinese young adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 29(3), 696–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12406.CrossRefPubMed

Liu, J., Zhou, T., Yuan, M., Ren, H., Bian, X., & Coplan, R. J. (2021). Daily routines, parent–child conflict, and psychological maladjustment among Chinese children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(8), 1077–1085. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000914.CrossRefPubMed

Ma, T.-L., Meter, D. J., Chen, W.-T., & Lee, Y. (2019). Defending behavior of peer victimization in school and cyber context during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of individual and peer-relational characteristics. Psychological Bulletin, 145(9), 891–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000205.CrossRefPubMed

Malamut, S. T., Trach, J., Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2021). Examining the potential mental health costs of defending victims of bullying: A longitudinal analysis. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(9), 1197–1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-021-00822-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Malamut, S. T., Trach, J., Garandeau, C. F., & Salmivalli, C. (2023). Does defending victimized peers put youth at risk of being victimized? Child Development, 94(2), 380–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13866.CrossRefPubMed

Meter, D. J., & Card, N. A. (2015). Effects of defending: The longitudinal relations among peer‐perceived defending of victimized peers, victimization, and liking. Social Development, 24(4), 734–747. https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12129.CrossRef

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2019). Mplus user’s guide (version 8.3). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.

Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396.MathSciNetCrossRef

Olweus, D. (1996). The revised Olweus bully/victim questionnaire. Research Center for Health Promotion (HEMIL Center). Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen.

Pozzoli, T., Gini, G., & Vieno, A. (2012). The role of individual correlates and class norms in defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: A multilevel analysis. Child Development, 83(6), 1917–1931. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01831.x.CrossRefPubMed

Pronk, J., Goossens, F. A., Olthof, T., de Mey, L., & Willemen, A. M. (2013). Children’s intervention strategies in situations of victimization by bullying: Social cognitions of outsiders versus defenders. Journal of School Psychology, 51(6), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2013.09.002.CrossRefPubMed

Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F. A., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2016). Defending victimized peers: Opposing the bully, supporting the victim, or both? Aggressive Behavior, 42(6), 585–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21653.CrossRefPubMed

Rivers, I., Poteat, V. P., Noret, N., & Ashurst, N. (2009). Observing bullying at school: The mental health implications of witness status. School Psychology Quarterly, 24(4), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018164.CrossRef

Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2011.597090.CrossRefPubMed

Schäfer, M., Werner, N. E., & Crick, N. R. (2002). A comparison of two approaches to the study of negative peer treatment: General victimization and bully/victim problems among German schoolchildren. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(2), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166451.CrossRef

Scholte, R. H., Burk, W. J., & Overbeek, G. (2013). Divergence in self-and peer-reported victimization and its association to concurrent and prospective adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 1789–1800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-012-9896-y.CrossRefPubMed

Schwartz, D., Chang, L., & Farver, J. M. (2001). Correlates of victimization in Chinese children’s peer groups. Developmental Psychology, 37(4), 520–532. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.37.4.520.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, R. L. (2015). Adolescents’ emotional engagement in friends’ problems and joys: Associations of empathetic distress and empathetic joy with friendship quality, depression, and anxiety. Journal of Adolescence, 45, 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.020.CrossRefPubMed

Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445.CrossRef

van der Ploeg, R., Kretschmer, T., Salmivalli, C., & Veenstra, R. (2017). Defending victims: What does it take to intervene in bullying and how is it rewarded by peers? Journal of School Psychology, 65, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.06.002.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, Z., Chen, X., Liu, J., Bullock, A., Li, D., Chen, X., & French, D. (2020). Moderating role of conflict resolution strategies in the links between peer victimization and psychological adjustment among youth. Journal of Adolescence, 79, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2020.01.002.CrossRefPubMed

Wang, Z., Laninga-Wijnen, L., Garandeau, C. F., & Liu, J. (2023). Development and validation of the Adolescent Defending Behaviors Questionnaire among Chinese early adolescents. Assessment, 10731911221149082. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221149082.

Yun, H. ‐Y. (2020). New approaches to defender and outsider roles in school bullying. Child Development, 91(4), e814–e832. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13312.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Different Ways to Defend Victims of Bullying: Defending Profiles and Their Associations with Adolescents’ Victimization Experiences and Depressive Symptoms
Auteurs: Guomin Jin
Xiaohua Bian
Tong Zhou
Junsheng Liu
Publicatiedatum: 30-11-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence / Uitgave 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0047-2891
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-6601
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-023-01904-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2024

Correction to: Peer Microaggressions and Social Skills among School-Age Children of Sexual Minority Parents through Assisted Reproduction: Moderation via the Child–Teacher Relationship

Mexican-Origin Children’s Trajectories of Ethnic-Racial Pride from Childhood through Emerging Adulthood: Associations with Mothers and Fathers’ Trajectories

Social Anxiety and Peer Victimization and Aggression: Examining Reciprocal Trait-State Effects among Early Adolescents

Unveiling Adolescent Suicidality: Holistic Analysis of Protective and Risk Factors Using Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms

Narcissism Moderates the Association Between Autonomy-Supportive Parenting and Adolescents’ Prosocial Behavior

The Association Between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs), Bullying Victimization, and Internalizing and Externalizing Problems Among Early Adolescents: Examining Cumulative and Interactive Associations