Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Based on the premises that strength-based assessment of children and adolescents is an important emerging area, and that additional tools for this purpose are needed, this study details development and validation efforts on a new strength-based assessment: the Social-Emotional Assets and Resilience Scale, parent form (SEARS-P). Following careful development of a comprehensive research prototype assessment, a large and diverse nationwide sample of more than 2,000 ratings of school-age children and adolescents were obtained from their parents and other caregivers. Factor analytic procedures revealed a robust and replicable underlying factor structure, including Self-Regulation/Responsibility, Social Competence, and Empathy factors. The factor scores and total score of the SEARS-P were shown to have strong internal consistency reliability, as well as strong interrater reliability between mother-father pairs who rated the same child. Convergent construct validity of the SEARS-P was established through findings of significant correlations with two established strength-based rating scales for use by parents. Construct validity of the SEARS-P was further bolstered through findings of significant gender differences in scores (with females rated as having higher levels of competency than males), as well as significant differences in scores based on educational disability status. Limitations and future research needs are discussed, as are implications of this study for research and practice with children and families.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Allen, S. J., & Graden, J. L. (2002). Best practices in collaborative problem solving for intervention design. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (4th ed., pp. 565–582). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edn., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
Beaver, B. R. (2008). A positive approach to children’s internalizing problems. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 129–136. CrossRef
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Signifcance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. CrossRef
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Epstein, M. H. (2000). The behavioral and emotional rating scale: A strength-based approach to assessment. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 25, 249–256. CrossRef
Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 61, 1–55. CrossRef
Jimerson, S. R., Sharkey, J. D., Nyborg, V., & Furlong, M. J. (2004). Strength-based assessment and school psychology: A summary and synthesis. California School Psychologist, 9, 9–19.
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. CrossRef
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & Hau, K. T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: Clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling techniques (pp. 315–353). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., & McDonald, R. R. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 391–410. CrossRef
Merrell, K. W. (2008). Behavioral, social, and emotional assessment of children and adolescents (3rd ed.). New York: Taylor & Francis.
Merrell, K. M., & Caldarella, P. (2002). Home and community social behavior scales. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.
Merrell, K. W., & Gimpel, G. A. (1998). Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Nickerson, A. B., & Fishman, C. (2009). Convergent and divergent validity of the devereux student strengths assessment. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 48–59. CrossRef
Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Bolt, S. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education (10th ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Smolkowski, K. (2007). Correlated errors in CFA and SEM models. Unpublished technical report. Eugene, OR: Oregon Research Institute.
- Development and Validation of a Parent Report Measure for Assessing Social-Emotional Competencies of Children and Adolescents
Kenneth W. Merrell
Josh C. Felver-Gant
Karalyn M. Tom
- Springer US