Skip to main content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2018

06-06-2017 | Original Article

Cues of control modulate the ascription of object ownership

Auteurs: Claudia Scorolli, Anna M. Borghi, Luca Tummolini

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Knowing whether an object is owned and by whom is essential to avoid costly conflicts. We hypothesize that everyday interactions around objects are influenced by a minimal sense of object ownership grounded on respect of possession. In particular, we hypothesize that tracking object ownership can be influenced by any cue that predicts the establishment of individual physical control over objects. To test this hypothesis we used an indirect method to determine whether visual cues of physical control like spatial proximity to an object, temporal priority in seeing it, and touching it influence this minimal sense of object ownership. In Experiment 1 participants were shown a neutral object located on a table, in the reaching space of one of two characters. In Experiment 2 one character was the first to find the object then another character appeared and saw the object. In Experiments 3 and 4, spatial proximity, temporal priority, and touch are pitted against each other to assess their relative weight. After having seen the scenes, participants were required to judge the sensibility of sentences in which ownership of the object was ascribed to one of the two characters. Responses were faster when the objects were located in the reaching space of the character to whom ownership was ascribed in the sentence and when ownership was ascribed to the character who was the first to find the object. When contrasting the relevant cues, results indicate that touch is stronger than temporal priority in modulating the ascription of object ownership. However, all these effects were also influenced by contextual social cues like the gender of both characters and participants, the presence of a third-party observer, and the co-presence of characters. Consistently with our hypothesis, results indicate that many different cues of physical control influence the ascription of ownership in daily social contexts.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Aglioti, S., Smania, N., Manfredi, M., & Berlucchi, G. (1996). Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuro Report, 8, 293–296. Aglioti, S., Smania, N., Manfredi, M., & Berlucchi, G. (1996). Disownership of left hand and objects related to it in a patient with right brain damage. Neuro Report, 8, 293–296.
go back to reference Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1627–1639. CrossRefPubMed Anelli, F., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2012). Grasping the pain: motor resonance with dangerous affordances. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1627–1639. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. PubMed Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. PubMed
go back to reference Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187. CrossRefPubMed Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Abstraction in perceptual symbol systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences, 358, 1177–1187. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology, 128, 365–380. CrossRef Beggan, J. K., & Brown, E. M. (1994). Association as a psychological justification for ownership. Journal of Psychology, 128, 365–380. CrossRef
go back to reference Blake, P. R., Ganea, P. A., & Harris, P. L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: with age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 259–272. CrossRefPubMed Blake, P. R., Ganea, P. A., & Harris, P. L. (2012). Possession is not always the law: with age, preschoolers increasingly use verbal information to identify who owns what. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 113, 259–272. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. CrossRefPubMed Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., & Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Borghi, A., & Scorolli, C. (2009). Language comprehension and dominant hand motion simulation. Human Movement Science, 28(1), 1–27. CrossRef Borghi, A., & Scorolli, C. (2009). Language comprehension and dominant hand motion simulation. Human Movement Science, 28(1), 1–27. CrossRef
go back to reference Botvinik, M. (2004). Probing the neural basis of body ownership. Science, 305, 782–783. CrossRef Botvinik, M. (2004). Probing the neural basis of body ownership. Science, 305, 782–783. CrossRef
go back to reference Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Property in nonhuman primates. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 9–22. Brosnan, S. F. (2011). Property in nonhuman primates. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 9–22.
go back to reference Bruzzo, A., Borghi, A. M., & Ghirlanda, S. (2008). Hand-object interaction in perspective. Neuroscience Letters, 441, 61–65. CrossRefPubMed Bruzzo, A., Borghi, A. M., & Ghirlanda, S. (2008). Hand-object interaction in perspective. Neuroscience Letters, 441, 61–65. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243–1249. CrossRefPubMed Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D. E., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2005). Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243–1249. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16(22), 2277. CrossRef Calvo-Merino, B., Grèzes, J., Glaser, D. E., Passingham, R. E., & Haggard, P. (2006). Seeing or doing? Influence of visual and motor familiarity in action observation. Current Biology, 16(22), 2277. CrossRef
go back to reference Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430–437. CrossRefPubMed Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., & Bayliss, A. P. (2011). Grasping the concept of personal property. Cognition, 119(3), 430–437. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., Lipp, O. V., & Bayliss, A. P. (2014). Object ownership and action: the influence of social context and choice on the physical manipulation of personal property. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 3749–3761. doi: 10.​1007/​s00221-014-4163. CrossRefPubMed Constable, M. D., Kritikos, A., Lipp, O. V., & Bayliss, A. P. (2014). Object ownership and action: the influence of social context and choice on the physical manipulation of personal property. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 3749–3761. doi: 10.​1007/​s00221-014-4163. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Coventry, K. R., Griffiths, D., & Hamilton, C. (2014). Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 46–70. CrossRefPubMed Coventry, K. R., Griffiths, D., & Hamilton, C. (2014). Spatial demonstratives and perceptual space: describing and remembering object location. Cognitive Psychology, 69, 46–70. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference DeScioli, P., & Karpoff, R. (2015). People’s judgments about classic property law cases. Human Nature, 26, 184–209. CrossRefPubMed DeScioli, P., & Karpoff, R. (2015). People’s judgments about classic property law cases. Human Nature, 26, 184–209. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elgesem, D. (1997). The modal logic of agency. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(2), 1–46. Elgesem, D. (1997). The modal logic of agency. Nordic Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2(2), 1–46.
go back to reference Epstein, R. A. (1979). Possession as the root of title. Georgia Law Review, 13, 1221–1243. Epstein, R. A. (1979). Possession as the root of title. Georgia Law Review, 13, 1221–1243.
go back to reference Ericson, K. M., & Andreas, F. (2014). The Endowment Effect. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 555–579. CrossRef Ericson, K. M., & Andreas, F. (2014). The Endowment Effect. Annual Review of Economics, 6, 555–579. CrossRef
go back to reference Eswaran, M., & Neary, H. M. (2014). An Economic Theory of the Evolutionary Emergence of Property Rights. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 203–226. Eswaran, M., & Neary, H. M. (2014). An Economic Theory of the Evolutionary Emergence of Property Rights. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6, 203–226.
go back to reference Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: an assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290–295. CrossRef Friedman, O. (2008). First possession: an assumption guiding inferences about who owns what. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 290–295. CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, O. (2010). Necessary for possession: how people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1161–1169. CrossRefPubMed Friedman, O. (2010). Necessary for possession: how people reason about the acquisition of ownership. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36, 1161–1169. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Defeyter, M. A., & Malcolm, S. L. (2011). Ownership and object history. New direction for child and adolescent development, 132, 79–89. doi: 10.​1002/​cd.​298. CrossRef Friedman, O., Neary, K. R., Defeyter, M. A., & Malcolm, S. L. (2011). Ownership and object history. New direction for child and adolescent development, 132, 79–89. doi: 10.​1002/​cd.​298. CrossRef
go back to reference Friedman, O., & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1–8. Friedman, O., & Ross, H. (2011). Twenty-one reasons to care about the psychological basis of ownership. In H. Ross & O. Friedman (Eds.), Origins of ownership of property. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 132, 1–8.
go back to reference Friedman, O., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M. A., & Neary, K. R. (2013). First possession, history, and young children’s ownership judgments. Child Development, 84, 1519–1525. CrossRefPubMed Friedman, O., Van de Vondervoort, J. W., Defeyter, M. A., & Neary, K. R. (2013). First possession, history, and young children’s ownership judgments. Child Development, 84, 1519–1525. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special with embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519. CrossRefPubMed Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special with embodied simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 1–16. CrossRef Gintis, H. (2007). The evolution of private property. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 64(1), 1–16. CrossRef
go back to reference Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401. CrossRef Glenberg, A. M., & Robertson, D. A. (2000). Symbol grounding and meaning: a comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3), 379–401. CrossRef
go back to reference Haggard, P., & Eitam, B. (Eds.). (2015). The sense of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Haggard, P., & Eitam, B. (Eds.). (2015). The sense of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Heine, B. (1997). Possession—cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef Heine, B. (1997). Possession—cognitive sources, forces, and grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Herslund, M., & Baron, I. (2001). Introduction: Dimensions of possession. In M. Herslund, I. Baron, & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Herslund, M., & Baron, I. (2001). Introduction: Dimensions of possession. In M. Herslund, I. Baron, & F. Sørensen (Eds.), Dimensions of possession (pp. 1–26). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co.
go back to reference Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Jackendoff, R. (1992). Languages of the mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
go back to reference Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348. CrossRef Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J., & Thaler, R. (1990). Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1325–1348. CrossRef
go back to reference Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. (2014). Not by labor alone: considerations for value influence use of the labor rule in ownership transfers. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 353–366. CrossRefPubMed Kanngiesser, P., & Hood, B. (2014). Not by labor alone: considerations for value influence use of the labor rule in ownership transfers. Cognitive Science, 38(2), 353–366. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–B89. CrossRefPubMed Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2005). Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79–B89. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kummer, H. (1991). Evolutionary transformations of possessive behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 75–83. Kummer, H. (1991). Evolutionary transformations of possessive behavior. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 75–83.
go back to reference Liuzza, M. T., Setti, A., & Borghi, A. M. (2012). Kids observing other kids’ hands: visuomotor priming in children. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 383–392. CrossRefPubMed Liuzza, M. T., Setti, A., & Borghi, A. M. (2012). Kids observing other kids’ hands: visuomotor priming in children. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 383–392. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lugli, L., Obertis, A. C., & Borghi, A. M. (2016). Hitting is male, giving is female: automatic imitation and complementarity during action observation. Psychological Research. doi: 10.​1007/​s00426-016-0808-8 Lugli, L., Obertis, A. C., & Borghi, A. M. (2016). Hitting is male, giving is female: automatic imitation and complementarity during action observation. Psychological Research. doi: 10.​1007/​s00426-016-0808-8
go back to reference Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 75–86. CrossRefPubMed Ma, K., & Hommel, B. (2015). Body-ownership for actively operated non-corporeal objects. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 75–86. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Marzoli, D., Mitaritonna, A., Moretto, F., Carluccio, P., & Tommasi, L. (2011). The handedness of imagined bodies in action and the role of perspective taking. Brain and Cognition, 75, 51–59. CrossRefPubMed Marzoli, D., Mitaritonna, A., Moretto, F., Carluccio, P., & Tommasi, L. (2011). The handedness of imagined bodies in action and the role of perspective taking. Brain and Cognition, 75, 51–59. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McAdams, R. H. (2009). Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: coordination, game theory, and law. Southern California Law Review, 82, 209–258. McAdams, R. H. (2009). Beyond the Prisoners’ Dilemma: coordination, game theory, and law. Southern California Law Review, 82, 209–258.
go back to reference Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77, 730–755. Merrill, T. W. (1998). Property and the right to exclude. Nebraska Law Review, 77, 730–755.
go back to reference Merrill, T. W. (2015). Possession and ownership. In Tun-Chien Chang (Ed.), Law and Economics of possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Merrill, T. W. (2015). Possession and ownership. In Tun-Chien Chang (Ed.), Law and Economics of possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. CrossRef Miller, G., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. CrossRef
go back to reference Noles, N. S., Keil, F. C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Children’s and adults’ intuitions about who can own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 265–286. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Noles, N. S., Keil, F. C., Bloom, P., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Children’s and adults’ intuitions about who can own things. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 12, 265–286. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Palamar, M., Le, D. T., & Friedman, O. (2012). Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility. Cognition, 124, 201–208. CrossRefPubMed Palamar, M., Le, D. T., & Friedman, O. (2012). Acquiring ownership and the attribution of responsibility. Cognition, 124, 201–208. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(2013), 189–196. CrossRef Peck, J., Barger, V. A., & Webb, A. (2013). In search of a surrogate for touch: The effect of haptic imagery on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(2013), 189–196. CrossRef
go back to reference Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 434–447. CrossRef Peck, J., & Shu, S. B. (2009). The effect of mere touch on perceived ownership. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 434–447. CrossRef
go back to reference Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing, 8, 115–131. CrossRefPubMed Pezzulo, G., & Castelfranchi, C. (2007). The symbol detachment problem. Cognitive Processing, 8, 115–131. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pietraszewski, D., & Shaw, A. (2015). Not by strength alone: children’s conflict expectations follow the logic of the asymmetric war of attrition. Human Nature, 26(1), 44–72. CrossRefPubMed Pietraszewski, D., & Shaw, A. (2015). Not by strength alone: children’s conflict expectations follow the logic of the asymmetric war of attrition. Human Nature, 26(1), 44–72. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pollux, P. M., Hermens, F., & Willmott, A. P. (2016). Age-congruency and contact effects in body expression recognition from point-light displays (PLD). PeerJ, 4, e2796. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pollux, P. M., Hermens, F., & Willmott, A. P. (2016). Age-congruency and contact effects in body expression recognition from point-light displays (PLD). PeerJ, 4, e2796. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Ranzini, M., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2011). With hands I don’t centre! Action- and object-related effects of hand-cueing in the line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2918–2928. CrossRefPubMed Ranzini, M., Borghi, A. M., & Nicoletti, R. (2011). With hands I don’t centre! Action- and object-related effects of hand-cueing in the line bisection. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2918–2928. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rose, C. M. (1985). Possession as the Origin of Property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(1), 73–88. CrossRef Rose, C. M. (1985). Possession as the Origin of Property. The University of Chicago Law Review, 52(1), 73–88. CrossRef
go back to reference Ross, H. S. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32, 90–101. CrossRef Ross, H. S. (1996). Negotiating principles of entitlement in sibling property disputes. Developmental Psychology, 32, 90–101. CrossRef
go back to reference Scorolli, C. (2014). Embodiment and Language. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. (pp. 127–138), Routledge: Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-415-62361-2. Scorolli, C. (2014). Embodiment and Language. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Embodied Cognition. (pp. 127–138), Routledge: Taylor & Francis. ISBN: 978-0-415-62361-2.
go back to reference Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Research, 1130(26), 119–124. CrossRefPubMed Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. (2007). Sentence comprehension and action: effector specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Research, 1130(26), 119–124. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sugden, R. (2004). The economics of rights, co-operation and welfare (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Sugden, R. (2004). The economics of rights, co-operation and welfare (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
go back to reference Tummolini, L., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Disentangling the sense of ownership from the sense of fairness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 101–102. CrossRefPubMed Tummolini, L., Scorolli, C., & Borghi, A. M. (2013). Disentangling the sense of ownership from the sense of fairness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 101–102. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Turk, D. J., van Bussel, K., Waiter, G. D., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Mine and me: exploring the neural basis of object ownership. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3657–3668. CrossRefPubMed Turk, D. J., van Bussel, K., Waiter, G. D., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Mine and me: exploring the neural basis of object ownership. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(11), 3657–3668. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wertz & German. (2007). Belief-desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior: do actions speak louder than words? Cognition, 105, 184–194. CrossRefPubMed Wertz & German. (2007). Belief-desire reasoning in the explanation of behavior: do actions speak louder than words? Cognition, 105, 184–194. CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolf, J. R., Arkes, H. R., & Muhanna, W. A. (2008). The power of touch: an examination of the effect of duration of physical contact on the valuation of objects. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 476–482. Wolf, J. R., Arkes, H. R., & Muhanna, W. A. (2008). The power of touch: an examination of the effect of duration of physical contact on the valuation of objects. Judgment and Decision Making, 3(6), 476–482.
go back to reference Zwaan, R.A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B.H. Ross (Ed.) Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62), vol. 44, New York: Academic. Zwaan, R.A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B.H. Ross (Ed.) Psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 35–62), vol. 44, New York: Academic.
Metagegevens
Titel
Cues of control modulate the ascription of object ownership
Auteurs
Claudia Scorolli
Anna M. Borghi
Luca Tummolini
Publicatiedatum
06-06-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0871-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2018

Psychological Research 5/2018 Naar de uitgave