Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2018

25-04-2017 | Original Article

The role of perspective in discriminating between social and non-social intentions from reach-to-grasp kinematics

Auteurs: Francesca Ciardo, Isabella Campanini, Andrea Merlo, Sandro Rubichi, Cristina Iani

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Making correct inferences regarding social and individual intentions may be crucial for successful interactions, especially when we are required to discriminate between cooperative and competitive behaviors. The results of previous studies indicate that reach-to-grasp kinematic parameters may be used to infer the social or individual outcome of a movement. However, the majority of the studies investigated this ability by presenting reach-to-grasp movements from a third-person perspective only. The aim of the present study was to assess whether the ability to recognize the intent associated to a reach-to-grasp movement varies as a function of perspective by manipulating the perspective of observation (second- and third-perspective) within participants. To this end, we presented participants with video clips of models performing a reach-to-grasp movement with different intents. The video clips were recorded both from a lateral view (third-person perspective) and from a frontal view (second-person perspective). After viewing the clips, in two subsequent tasks participants were asked to distinguish between social and non-social intentions by observing the initial phase of the same action recorded from the two different views. Results showed that, when a fast-speed movement was presented from a lateral view, participants were able to predict its social intention. In contrast, when the same movement was observed from a frontal view, performance was impaired. These results indicate that the ability to detect social intentions from motor cues can be biased by the visual perspective of the observer, specifically for fast-speed movements.
Voetnoten
1
To avoid misunderstanding and in line with Sartori, Becchio and Castiello (2011), with the term “social intention” we referred to an action intention that involves other agents (i.e., to grasp an object and move it to give it to somebody). In contrast, with the term “motor intention” we referred to the general goal of an action (i.e., to grasp and move an object from one position to another).
 
2
The criterion c reflects a general tendency to use one of the two response keys, thus a value of 0 indicates neutral bias.
 
3
A value of 0 indicates an inability to distinguish signal from no signal, whereas larger values indicate a correspondingly greater ability to distinguish signal from noise.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Koul, A., D’Ausilio, A., Taverna, L., & Becchio, C. (2016). Grasping others’ movements: Rapid discrimination of object size from observed hand movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 918–929. doi:10.1037/xhp0000169.PubMed Ansuini, C., Cavallo, A., Koul, A., D’Ausilio, A., Taverna, L., & Becchio, C. (2016). Grasping others’ movements: Rapid discrimination of object size from observed hand movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(7), 918–929. doi:10.​1037/​xhp0000169.PubMed
go back to reference Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., Boria, S., Pieraccini, C., Monti, A., Cossu, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(45), 17825–17830. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706273104.CrossRef Cattaneo, L., Fabbri-Destro, M., Boria, S., Pieraccini, C., Monti, A., Cossu, G., & Rizzolatti, G. (2007). Impairment of actions chains in autism and its possible role in intention understanding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(45), 17825–17830. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​0706273104.CrossRef
go back to reference De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.CrossRef De Jaegher, H., & Di Paolo, E. (2007). Participatory sense-making: An enactive approach to social cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 6(4), 485–507.CrossRef
go back to reference Deutsch, M. (2011). Cooperation and competition. In P. Coleman (Ed.), Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. The Intellectual Legacy of Morton Deutsch (pp. 23–40). New York: Springer.CrossRef Deutsch, M. (2011). Cooperation and competition. In P. Coleman (Ed.), Conflict, Interdependence, and Justice. The Intellectual Legacy of Morton Deutsch (pp. 23–40). New York: Springer.CrossRef
go back to reference Di Paolo, E. A., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 68–78). Abingdon: Routledge. Di Paolo, E. A., & Thompson, E. (2014). The enactive approach. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition (pp. 68–78). Abingdon: Routledge.
go back to reference Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events, a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefPubMed Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Understanding motor events, a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, 176–180.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gallese, V. (2014). Bodily selves in relation: embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 369(1644), 20130177. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0177.CrossRef Gallese, V. (2014). Bodily selves in relation: embodied simulation as second-person perspective on intersubjectivity. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 369(1644), 20130177. doi:10.​1098/​rstb.​2013.​0177.CrossRef
go back to reference Hautus, M. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46–51.CrossRef Hautus, M. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27, 46–51.CrossRef
go back to reference Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(1), 21–25.CrossRefPubMed Jacob, P., & Jeannerod, M. (2005). The motor theory of social cognition: a critique. Trends in cognitive sciences, 9(1), 21–25.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
go back to reference Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 547–556. doi:10.1007/S00221-011-2649-4.CrossRefPubMed Manera, V., Becchio, C., Cavallo, A., Sartori, L., & Castiello, U. (2011). Cooperation or competition? Discriminating between social intentions by observing prehensile movements. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 547–556. doi:10.​1007/​S00221-011-2649-4.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Murphy, M. A., Sunnerhagen, K. S., Johnels, B., & Willén, C. (2006). Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 1–11. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-3-18.CrossRef Murphy, M. A., Sunnerhagen, K. S., Johnels, B., & Willén, C. (2006). Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3(1), 1–11. doi:10.​1186/​1743-0003-3-18.CrossRef
go back to reference Quesque, F., & Coello, Y. (2015). Perceiving what you intend to do from what you do: evidence for embodiment in social interactions. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology. doi:10.3402/snp.v5.28602. Quesque, F., & Coello, Y. (2015). Perceiving what you intend to do from what you do: evidence for embodiment in social interactions. Socioaffective Neuroscience & Psychology. doi:10.​3402/​snp.​v5.​28602.
go back to reference Quesque, F., Delevoye-Turrell, Y., & Coello, Y. (2015). Facilitation effect of observed motor deviants in a cooperative motor task: Evidence for direct perception of social intention in action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 218, 1–13. doi:10.1080/17470218.2015.1083596. Quesque, F., Delevoye-Turrell, Y., & Coello, Y. (2015). Facilitation effect of observed motor deviants in a cooperative motor task: Evidence for direct perception of social intention in action. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 218, 1–13. doi:10.​1080/​17470218.​2015.​1083596.
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parietofrontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Review Neuroscience, 11, 264–274.CrossRef Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2010). The functional role of the parietofrontal mirror circuit: Interpretations and misinterpretations. Nature Review Neuroscience, 11, 264–274.CrossRef
go back to reference Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Mashima, R., Shimoma, E., & Kanazawa, S. (2003). You can judge a book by its cover: Evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 290–301. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(03)00035-7.CrossRef Yamagishi, T., Tanida, S., Mashima, R., Shimoma, E., & Kanazawa, S. (2003). You can judge a book by its cover: Evidence that cheaters may look different from cooperators. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 290–301. doi:10.​1016/​S1090-5138(03)00035-7.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The role of perspective in discriminating between social and non-social intentions from reach-to-grasp kinematics
Auteurs
Francesca Ciardo
Isabella Campanini
Andrea Merlo
Sandro Rubichi
Cristina Iani
Publicatiedatum
25-04-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2018
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0868-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2018

Psychological Research 5/2018 Naar de uitgave