Skip to main content
main-content

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

30-05-2018 | Brief Report | Uitgave 10/2018

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10/2018

Brief Report: Risk-Aversion and Rationality in Autism Spectrum Disorders

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > Uitgave 10/2018
Auteurs:
Corentin J. Gosling, Sylvain Moutier
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10803-018-3616-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Risk-aversion and rationality have both been highlighted as core features of decision making in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). This study tested whether risk-aversion is related to rational decision-making in ASD individuals. ASD and matched control adults completed a decision-making task that discriminated between the use of risk-averse and rational strategies. Results showed that overall, ASD participants were more risk-averse than control participants. Specifically, both groups made similar choices when risk-aversion was the less rational strategy but ASD participants chose more rational options than control participants when risk-aversion was the most rational strategy. This study confirmed that risk-aversion is a core feature of ASD and revealed that ASD individuals can switch their decision-making strategy adaptively to avoid negative consequences.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Extra materiaal
Online Appendix—Example of a gain trial in the unequal expected value (EV) condition. First, participants received an initial sum of money to play the trial. Second, they were informed that they would not be able to keep the entire initial amount of money and would have to choose between a sure option (framed in terms of gain) and a risky option. In the gain frame of the unequal EV condition, the EV of the sure option (here, EVSure = 18€) was always inferior to the EV of the risky option (here, EVRisky = 20€) (TIF 2480 KB)
10803_2018_3616_MOESM1_ESM.tif
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2018

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 10/2018Naar de uitgave