Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 3/2019

22-11-2018

Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-57 and -29 item short forms among kidney transplant recipients

Auteurs: Evan Tang, Oladapo Ekundayo, John Devin Peipert, Nathaniel Edwards, Aarushi Bansal, Candice Richardson, Susan J. Bartlett, Doris Howell, Madeline Li, David Cella, Marta Novak, Istvan Mucsi

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Objective

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) aims to address the lack of generalizable and universal measure of patient-reported outcomes to assess health-related quality of life. It has not been validated for patients with chronic kidney disease. We aim to validate the PROMIS-57 and PROMIS-29 questionnaires among kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

A cross-sectional sample of stable kidney transplant recipients was recruited. Each participant completed PROMIS-57, a 57-question instrument covering seven domains—physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, sleep disturbance, and social functioning—alongside validated legacy questionnaires [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), General Anxiety Disorder (GAD7), Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale revised (ESASr), and Kidney Disease Quality of Life (KDQoL-36)]. PROMIS-29, a 29-question instrument, is nested within PROMIS-57 and measures the same domains. Structural validity of PROMIS was assessed with confirmatory factor analysis, reported using the Comparative Fit Index (CFI). Construct validity was assessed with known-groups comparisons. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach’s α and convergent validity was assessed with Spearman’s Rho. Test–retest reliability was assessed through the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

Mean (± SD) age of the 177 participants was 50 (± 17), 57% were male and 55% Caucasian. Internal consistency of each domain was high (Cronbach’s α > 0.88). Confirmatory factor analysis showed good structural validity for most domains (CFI > 0.95, RMSEA < 0.05). Test–retest reliability indicated good agreement (ICC > 0.6). Known-groups comparisons by clinical and socio-demographic differences were found as hypothesized.

Conclusions

Our results provide evidence that PROMIS-57 and PROMIS-29 are highly reliable and valid instruments among kidney transplant recipients. We propose it as a valuable tool to assess important domains of the illness experience.
Literatuur
6.
go back to reference Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2012. (2013). Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Official Journal of the International Society of Nephrology: Kidney International Supplements, 3, 1–150. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group KDIGO 2012. (2013). Clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and management of chronic kidney disease. Official Journal of the International Society of Nephrology: Kidney International Supplements, 3, 1–150.
7.
go back to reference Cetingok, M., Hathaway, D. K., & Winsett, R. R. (2005). Differences in quality of life before transplantation among transplant recipients with respect to selected socioeconomic variables. Progress in Transplantation, 15(4), 338–344. PubMedCrossRef Cetingok, M., Hathaway, D. K., & Winsett, R. R. (2005). Differences in quality of life before transplantation among transplant recipients with respect to selected socioeconomic variables. Progress in Transplantation, 15(4), 338–344. PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Carle, A. C., Cella, D., Cai, L., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Curtis, S. M., et al. (2011). Advancing PROMIS’s methodology: Results of the third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS((R))) psychometric summit. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 11(6), 677–684. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1586/​erp.​11.​74. CrossRef Carle, A. C., Cella, D., Cai, L., Choi, S. W., Crane, P. K., Curtis, S. M., et al. (2011). Advancing PROMIS’s methodology: Results of the third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS((R))) psychometric summit. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research, 11(6), 677–684. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1586/​erp.​11.​74. CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(3), 304–314. PubMedPubMedCentral Gershon, R. C., Rothrock, N., Hanrahan, R., Bass, M., & Cella, D. (2010). The use of PROMIS and assessment center to deliver patient-reported outcome measures in clinical research. Journal of Applied Measurement, 11(3), 304–314. PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33(6), 781–792. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., Germain, A., Stover, A., Dodds, N. E., et al. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33(6), 781–792. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1035–1044. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hahn, E. A., DeVellis, R. F., Bode, R. K., Garcia, S. F., Castel, L. D., Eisen, S. V., et al. (2010). Measuring social health in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Item bank development and testing. Quality of Life Research, 19(7), 1035–1044. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Ricardo, A. C., Hacker, E., Lora, C. M., Ackerson, L., DeSalvo, K. B., Go, A., et al. (2013). Validation of the kidney disease quality of life short form 36 (KDQOL-36™) US Spanish and English versions in a cohort of hispanics with chronic kidney disease. Ethnicity and Disease, 23(2), 202–209. PubMed Ricardo, A. C., Hacker, E., Lora, C. M., Ackerson, L., DeSalvo, K. B., Go, A., et al. (2013). Validation of the kidney disease quality of life short form 36 (KDQOL-36™) US Spanish and English versions in a cohort of hispanics with chronic kidney disease. Ethnicity and Disease, 23(2), 202–209. PubMed
45.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., Kallich, J. D., Mapes, D. L., Coons, S. J., & Carter, W. B. (1994). Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Quality of Life Research, 3(5), 329–338. PubMedCrossRef Hays, R. D., Kallich, J. D., Mapes, D. L., Coons, S. J., & Carter, W. B. (1994). Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Quality of Life Research, 3(5), 329–338. PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Economics, 2(3), 217–227. PubMedCrossRef Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Health Economics, 2(3), 217–227. PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9. PubMedCrossRef Bruera, E., Kuehn, N., Miller, M. J., Selmser, P., & Macmillan, K. (1991). The Edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): A simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. Journal of Palliative Care, 7(2), 6–9. PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Pokarowski, M., Liao, S. D.,A. A.,M. K.,O. E., B., et al. (2018). Validation of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). American Transplant Congress, June 2–6, 2018; Seattle, Washington. Pokarowski, M., Liao, S. D.,A. A.,M. K.,O. E., B., et al. (2018). Validation of Edmonton Symptom Assessment System in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). American Transplant Congress, June 2–6, 2018; Seattle, Washington.
53.
go back to reference Pokarowski, M., Albdalla, D. S., Khalid, A., Ekundayo, M., Liao, O., Edwards, Y., & Mucsi, N. I. (2017). Validation of Edmonton symptom assessment survey in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). American Journal of Transplantation. 17(suppl 3), 698 Pokarowski, M., Albdalla, D. S., Khalid, A., Ekundayo, M., Liao, O., Edwards, Y., & Mucsi, N. I. (2017). Validation of Edmonton symptom assessment survey in kidney transplant recipients (KTR). American Journal of Transplantation. 17(suppl 3), 698
55.
go back to reference Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. validation studies. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. [Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t. validation studies. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
61.
go back to reference Howell, D., Keshavarz, H., Esplen, M. J., Hack, T., Hamel, M., Howes, J., et al. (2010). Pan-Canadian practice guideline: Screening, assessment and management of psychosocial distress, major depression and anxiety in adults with cancer. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Action Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, 1–344. Howell, D., Keshavarz, H., Esplen, M. J., Hack, T., Hamel, M., Howes, J., et al. (2010). Pan-Canadian practice guideline: Screening, assessment and management of psychosocial distress, major depression and anxiety in adults with cancer. Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (Cancer Journey Action Group) and the Canadian Association of Psychosocial Oncology, 1–344.
62.
go back to reference B. R. A. Kidney Care Committee (Ed.). (2015). Depression and anxiety: The role of kidney care clinics. Vancouver: BC Renal Agency. B. R. A. Kidney Care Committee (Ed.). (2015). Depression and anxiety: The role of kidney care clinics. Vancouver: BC Renal Agency.
68.
go back to reference Wright, E. P., Kiely, M., Johnston, C., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2005). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Qual Life Res, 14(2), 373–386. PubMedCrossRef Wright, E. P., Kiely, M., Johnston, C., Smith, A. B., Cull, A., & Selby, P. J. (2005). Development and evaluation of an instrument to assess social difficulties in routine oncology practice. Qual Life Res, 14(2), 373–386. PubMedCrossRef
69.
go back to reference Kwok, M., Liao, B., Wong, D., Tang, E., Khalafi, F., Edwards, N., et al. (2017). Psychosocial distress and health related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients. Paper presented at the CST-CNTRP-SQT Joint Scientific Meeting Halifax, NS, Canada. Kwok, M., Liao, B., Wong, D., Tang, E., Khalafi, F., Edwards, N., et al. (2017). Psychosocial distress and health related quality of life in kidney transplant recipients. Paper presented at the CST-CNTRP-SQT Joint Scientific Meeting Halifax, NS, Canada.
70.
go back to reference Richardson, C., Belenko, D., Mucsi, E. C., Edwards, N., Wong, D., Novak, M., et al. (2017). Psychosocial distress in chronic kidney disease: Benefits of kidney transplantation. Paper presented at the American Transplant Congress, Chicago, IL, USA. Richardson, C., Belenko, D., Mucsi, E. C., Edwards, N., Wong, D., Novak, M., et al. (2017). Psychosocial distress in chronic kidney disease: Benefits of kidney transplantation. Paper presented at the American Transplant Congress, Chicago, IL, USA.
74.
go back to reference Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS-windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS-windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.
76.
go back to reference Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 663): Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2003). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 663): Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
78.
go back to reference Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
90.
go back to reference Parsaei Mehr, Z., Hami, M., & Moshtagh Eshgh, Z. (2011). Anxiety and depression: A comparison between living and cadaveric renal transplant recipients. International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine, 2(4), 178–183. PubMedPubMedCentral Parsaei Mehr, Z., Hami, M., & Moshtagh Eshgh, Z. (2011). Anxiety and depression: A comparison between living and cadaveric renal transplant recipients. International Journal of Organ Transplantation Medicine, 2(4), 178–183. PubMedPubMedCentral
92.
go back to reference Ferris, M. E., Miles, J. A., & Seamon, M. L. (2016). Adolescents and young adults with chronic or end-stage kidney disease. Blood Purification, 41(1–3), 205–210. PubMedCrossRef Ferris, M. E., Miles, J. A., & Seamon, M. L. (2016). Adolescents and young adults with chronic or end-stage kidney disease. Blood Purification, 41(1–3), 205–210. PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Validation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-57 and -29 item short forms among kidney transplant recipients
Auteurs
Evan Tang
Oladapo Ekundayo
John Devin Peipert
Nathaniel Edwards
Aarushi Bansal
Candice Richardson
Susan J. Bartlett
Doris Howell
Madeline Li
David Cella
Marta Novak
Istvan Mucsi
Publicatiedatum
22-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2058-2