Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

19-11-2018 | Brief Communication

Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders

Auteurs: Karl Bang Christensen, Kristian Thorborg, Per Hölmich, Mikkel Bek Clausen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The psychometric properties of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) have been extensively evaluated using classical test theory, but very few studies have applied Rasch analysis. The purpose of this study was to validate the Danish version using Rasch analysis.

Methods

Responses to the SPADI from 229 patients (48% female, mean age 54.5) were included in the Rasch analysis. Overall fit, individual item fit, local response dependence, dimensionality, targeting, reliability, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined.

Results

After iterative analyses, good fit to the Rasch model was observed, with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales: Pain and Functional Disability. The pain subscale initially demonstrated misfit due to local dependence and DIF, but a log linear Rasch model showed good fit to the Rasch model with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version.

Conclusions

The measurement properties of the Danish SPADI are similar to those of the English version. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales. For the pain subscale, DIF with respect to age was disclosed, but the impact was small. The eight-item disability subscale did not fit the Rasch model. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), 123–140.CrossRef Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), 123–140.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
3.
go back to reference Buchbinder, R., Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Beaton, D., Kopkow, C., et al. (2017). A preliminary core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders: A report from the OMERACT 2016 shoulder core outcome set special interest group. The Journal of Rheumatology, 44(12), 1880–1883.CrossRefPubMed Buchbinder, R., Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Beaton, D., Kopkow, C., et al. (2017). A preliminary core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders: A report from the OMERACT 2016 shoulder core outcome set special interest group. The Journal of Rheumatology, 44(12), 1880–1883.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rasch models in health. Hoboken: Wiley. Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rasch models in health. Hoboken: Wiley.
5.
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.CrossRefPubMed Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Christensen, K. B., & Olsbjerg, M. (2013). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation in polytomous Rasch models using SAS. Pub Inst Stat Univ, 57, 69–84. Christensen, K. B., & Olsbjerg, M. (2013). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation in polytomous Rasch models using SAS. Pub Inst Stat Univ, 57, 69–84.
7.
go back to reference Christiansen, D. H., Andersen, J. H., & Haahr, J. P. (2013). Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(4), 355–360.CrossRefPubMed Christiansen, D. H., Andersen, J. H., & Haahr, J. P. (2013). Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(4), 355–360.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Clausen, M., Witten, A., Holm, K., Christensen, K., Attrup, M., Hölmich, P., et al. (2017). Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic strength impairments exists in patients with subacromial impingement, but these are not reflected in the shoulder pain and disability index. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clausen, M., Witten, A., Holm, K., Christensen, K., Attrup, M., Hölmich, P., et al. (2017). Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic strength impairments exists in patients with subacromial impingement, but these are not reflected in the shoulder pain and disability index. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Clausen, M. B., Merrild, M. B., Witten, A., Christensen, K. B., Zebis, M. K., Hölmich, P., et al. (2018). Conservative treatment for patients with subacromial impingement: Changes in clinical core outcomes and their relation to specific rehabilitation parameters. PeerJ, 6, e4400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Clausen, M. B., Merrild, M. B., Witten, A., Christensen, K. B., Zebis, M. K., Hölmich, P., et al. (2018). Conservative treatment for patients with subacromial impingement: Changes in clinical core outcomes and their relation to specific rehabilitation parameters. PeerJ, 6, e4400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Dawson, J., Harris, K. K., Doll, H., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (2016). A comparison of the Oxford shoulder score and shoulder pain and disability index: Factor structure in the context of a large randomized controlled trial. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 7, 195–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dawson, J., Harris, K. K., Doll, H., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (2016). A comparison of the Oxford shoulder score and shoulder pain and disability index: Factor structure in the context of a large randomized controlled trial. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 7, 195–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the mini-mental state examination. Medical Care, 44(11), S134–S142.CrossRef Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the mini-mental state examination. Medical Care, 44(11), S134–S142.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.). (1995). Rasch models. New York: Springer. Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.). (1995). Rasch models. New York: Springer.
13.
go back to reference Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
14.
go back to reference Horton, M., Marais, I., & Christensen, K. B. (2013). Dimensionality. Rasch models in health (pp. 137–158). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef Horton, M., Marais, I., & Christensen, K. B. (2013). Dimensionality. Rasch models in health (pp. 137–158). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Jerosch-Herold, C., Chester, R., Shepstone, L., Vincent, J. I., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model. Quality of Life Research, 27(2), 389–400.CrossRefPubMed Jerosch-Herold, C., Chester, R., Shepstone, L., Vincent, J. I., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model. Quality of Life Research, 27(2), 389–400.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 49(2), 223–245.CrossRef Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 49(2), 223–245.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kreiner, S. (2003). Introduction to DIGRAM. Research Report 10, Department of Statistics, University of Copenhagen. Kreiner, S. (2003). Introduction to DIGRAM. Research Report 10, Department of Statistics, University of Copenhagen.
18.
go back to reference Kreiner, S. (2011). A note on item-restscore association in Rasch models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(7), 557–561.CrossRef Kreiner, S. (2011). A note on item-restscore association in Rasch models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(7), 557–561.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2011). Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika, 76(2), 228–256.CrossRef Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2011). Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika, 76(2), 228–256.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kreiner, S., & Nielsen, T. (2013). Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04: Part I: Guided tours. Department of Biostastistics, University of Copenhagen. Kreiner, S., & Nielsen, T. (2013). Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04: Part I: Guided tours. Department of Biostastistics, University of Copenhagen.
21.
go back to reference Marais, I. (2013). Local dependence. In Rasch models in health (pp. 111–130). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef Marais, I. (2013). Local dependence. In Rasch models in health (pp. 111–130). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Gagnier, J. J., & Buchbinder, R. (2018). Outcome reporting in randomized trials for shoulder disorders: Literature review to inform the development of a core outcome set. Arthritis Care & Research, 70(2), 252–259.CrossRef Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Gagnier, J. J., & Buchbinder, R. (2018). Outcome reporting in randomized trials for shoulder disorders: Literature review to inform the development of a core outcome set. Arthritis Care & Research, 70(2), 252–259.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 1–18.CrossRefPubMed Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 1–18.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research. Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research.
25.
go back to reference Roach, K. E., Budiman-Mak, E., Songsiridej, N., & Lertratanakul, Y. (1991). Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care and Research: The Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 4(4), 143–149.CrossRef Roach, K. E., Budiman-Mak, E., Songsiridej, N., & Lertratanakul, Y. (1991). Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care and Research: The Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 4(4), 143–149.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Roy, J.-S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2009). Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(5), 623–632.CrossRefPubMed Roy, J.-S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2009). Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(5), 623–632.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference SAS Institute (2013). SAS 9.4 Language reference: Concepts. Cary: SAS Institute Inc. SAS Institute (2013). SAS 9.4 Language reference: Concepts. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.
28.
go back to reference Van der linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.CrossRef Van der linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Witten, A., Clausen, M. B., Thorborg, K., Attrup, M. L., & Hölmich, P. (2018). Patients who are candidates for subacromial decompression have more pronounced range of motion deficits, but do not differ in self-reported shoulder function, strength or pain compared to non-candidates. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA, 26(8), 2505–2511.CrossRef Witten, A., Clausen, M. B., Thorborg, K., Attrup, M. L., & Hölmich, P. (2018). Patients who are candidates for subacromial decompression have more pronounced range of motion deficits, but do not differ in self-reported shoulder function, strength or pain compared to non-candidates. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA, 26(8), 2505–2511.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders
Auteurs
Karl Bang Christensen
Kristian Thorborg
Per Hölmich
Mikkel Bek Clausen
Publicatiedatum
19-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2052-8