Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften Toetsvragen Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in:

19-11-2018 | Brief Communication

Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders

Auteurs: Karl Bang Christensen, Kristian Thorborg, Per Hölmich, Mikkel Bek Clausen

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 3/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The psychometric properties of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) have been extensively evaluated using classical test theory, but very few studies have applied Rasch analysis. The purpose of this study was to validate the Danish version using Rasch analysis.

Methods

Responses to the SPADI from 229 patients (48% female, mean age 54.5) were included in the Rasch analysis. Overall fit, individual item fit, local response dependence, dimensionality, targeting, reliability, and differential item functioning (DIF) were examined.

Results

After iterative analyses, good fit to the Rasch model was observed, with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales: Pain and Functional Disability. The pain subscale initially demonstrated misfit due to local dependence and DIF, but a log linear Rasch model showed good fit to the Rasch model with acceptable targeting and uni-dimensionality. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version.

Conclusions

The measurement properties of the Danish SPADI are similar to those of the English version. SPADI should be reported as two separate subscales. For the pain subscale, DIF with respect to age was disclosed, but the impact was small. The eight-item disability subscale did not fit the Rasch model. A six-item version of the disability subscale exhibited adequate fit in the Danish version. The same items were also found to fit the Rasch model in the English version.
vorige artikel Psychometric properties of the Quality of Life Inventory-Disability (QI-Disability) measure
volgende artikel A new scale for measuring quality of life in acquired brain injury
Literatuur
1.
Andersen, E. B. (1973). A goodness of fit test for the rasch model. Psychometrika, 38(1), 123–140.CrossRef
2.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
3.
Buchbinder, R., Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Beaton, D., Kopkow, C., et al. (2017). A preliminary core domain set for clinical trials of shoulder disorders: A report from the OMERACT 2016 shoulder core outcome set special interest group. The Journal of Rheumatology, 44(12), 1880–1883.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Christensen, K. B., Kreiner, S., & Mesbah, M. (Eds.). (2013). Rasch models in health. Hoboken: Wiley.
5.
Christensen, K. B., Makransky, G., & Horton, M. (2017). Critical values for Yen’s Q 3: Identification of local dependence in the Rasch model using residual correlations. Applied Psychological Measurement, 41(3), 178–194.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Christensen, K. B., & Olsbjerg, M. (2013). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation in polytomous Rasch models using SAS. Pub Inst Stat Univ, 57, 69–84.
7.
Christiansen, D. H., Andersen, J. H., & Haahr, J. P. (2013). Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(4), 355–360.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Clausen, M., Witten, A., Holm, K., Christensen, K., Attrup, M., Hölmich, P., et al. (2017). Glenohumeral and scapulothoracic strength impairments exists in patients with subacromial impingement, but these are not reflected in the shoulder pain and disability index. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 18(1), 302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
Clausen, M. B., Merrild, M. B., Witten, A., Christensen, K. B., Zebis, M. K., Hölmich, P., et al. (2018). Conservative treatment for patients with subacromial impingement: Changes in clinical core outcomes and their relation to specific rehabilitation parameters. PeerJ, 6, e4400.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
Dawson, J., Harris, K. K., Doll, H., Fitzpatrick, R., & Carr, A. (2016). A comparison of the Oxford shoulder score and shoulder pain and disability index: Factor structure in the context of a large randomized controlled trial. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 7, 195–203.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach: Application to the mini-mental state examination. Medical Care, 44(11), S134–S142.CrossRef
12.
Fischer, G. H., & Molenaar, I. W. (Eds.). (1995). Rasch models. New York: Springer.
13.
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential Item Functioning. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
14.
Horton, M., Marais, I., & Christensen, K. B. (2013). Dimensionality. Rasch models in health (pp. 137–158). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef
15.
Jerosch-Herold, C., Chester, R., Shepstone, L., Vincent, J. I., & MacDermid, J. C. (2017). An evaluation of the structural validity of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) using the Rasch model. Quality of Life Research, 27(2), 389–400.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Kelderman, H. (1984). Loglinear Rasch model tests. Psychometrika, 49(2), 223–245.CrossRef
17.
Kreiner, S. (2003). Introduction to DIGRAM. Research Report 10, Department of Statistics, University of Copenhagen.
18.
Kreiner, S. (2011). A note on item-restscore association in Rasch models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 35(7), 557–561.CrossRef
19.
Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2011). Item screening in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Psychometrika, 76(2), 228–256.CrossRef
20.
Kreiner, S., & Nielsen, T. (2013). Item analysis in DIGRAM 3.04: Part I: Guided tours. Department of Biostastistics, University of Copenhagen.
21.
Marais, I. (2013). Local dependence. In Rasch models in health (pp. 111–130). Hoboken: Wiley.CrossRef
22.
Page, M. J., Huang, H., Verhagen, A. P., Gagnier, J. J., & Buchbinder, R. (2018). Outcome reporting in randomized trials for shoulder disorders: Literature review to inform the development of a core outcome set. Arthritis Care & Research, 70(2), 252–259.CrossRef
23.
Pallant, J. F., & Tennant, A. (2007). An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: An example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 1–18.CrossRefPubMed
24.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish National Institute for Educational Research.
25.
Roach, K. E., Budiman-Mak, E., Songsiridej, N., & Lertratanakul, Y. (1991). Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care and Research: The Official Journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association, 4(4), 143–149.CrossRef
26.
Roy, J.-S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2009). Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(5), 623–632.CrossRefPubMed
27.
SAS Institute (2013). SAS 9.4 Language reference: Concepts. Cary: SAS Institute Inc.
28.
Van der linden, W. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1997). Handbook of modern item response theory. New York: Springer.CrossRef
29.
Witten, A., Clausen, M. B., Thorborg, K., Attrup, M. L., & Hölmich, P. (2018). Patients who are candidates for subacromial decompression have more pronounced range of motion deficits, but do not differ in self-reported shoulder function, strength or pain compared to non-candidates. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA, 26(8), 2505–2511.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Rasch validation of the Danish version of the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI) in patients with rotator cuff-related disorders
Auteurs
Karl Bang Christensen
Kristian Thorborg
Per Hölmich
Mikkel Bek Clausen
Publicatiedatum
19-11-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-2052-8

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2019

Pre-injury health status of injured patients: a prospective comparison with the Dutch population

  • Open Access

Assessing the measurement invariance of the RCADS-25 questionnaire across gender and child–parent dyads in the presence of multilevel data

A new scale for measuring quality of life in acquired brain injury

In proportion: approaches for displaying patient-reported outcome research study results as percentages responding to treatment

Interpretation and use of patient-reported outcome measures through a philosophical lens

  • Commentary

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials evaluating the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs)

  • Review