Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Auditory feedback of actions provides additional information about the timing of one’s own actions and those of others. However, little is known about how musicians and nonmusicians integrate auditory feedback from multiple sources to regulate their own timing or to (intentionally or unintentionally) coordinate with a partner. We examined how musical expertise modulates the role of auditory feedback in a two-person synchronization–continuation tapping task. Pairs of individuals were instructed to tap at a rate indicated by an initial metronome cue in all four auditory feedback conditions: no feedback, self-feedback (cannot hear their partner), other feedback (cannot hear themselves), or full feedback (both self and other). Participants within a pair were either both musically trained (musicians), both untrained (nonmusicians), or one musically trained and one untrained (mixed). Results demonstrated that all three pair types spontaneously synchronized with their partner when receiving other or full feedback. Moreover, all pair types were better at maintaining the metronome rate with self-feedback than with no feedback. Musician pairs better maintained the metronome rate when receiving other feedback than when receiving no feedback; in contrast, nonmusician pairs were worse when receiving other or full feedback compared to no feedback. Both members of mixed pairs maintained the metronome rate better in the other and full feedback conditions than in the no feedback condition, similar to musician pairs. Overall, nonmusicians benefited from musicians’ expertise without negatively influencing musicians’ ability to maintain the tapping rate. One implication is that nonmusicians may improve their beat-keeping abilities by performing tasks with musically skilled individuals.
Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (1997). Delayed auditory feedback in synchronization. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29(1), 35–46. PubMed
Bakeman, R. (2005). Recommended effect size statistics for repeated measures designs. Behavior Research Methods, 37(3), 379–384. PubMed
Bolt, N. K., Poncelet, E. M., Schultz, B. G., & Loehr, J. D. (2016). Mutual coordination strengthens the sense of joint agency in cooperative joint action. Consciousness and cognition, 46, 173–187. PubMed
Demos, A. P., Chaffin, R., Begosh, K. T., Daniels, J. R., & Marsh, K. L. (2012). Rocking to the beat: Effects of music and partner’s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 49.
Drake, C., & Palmer, C. (2000). Skill acquisition in music performance: relations between planning and temporal control. Cognition, 74(1), 1–32. PubMed
Franěk, M., Mates, J., Radil, T., Beck, K., & Pöppel, E. (1991). Finger tapping in musicians and nonmusicians. International Journal of psychophysiology, 11(3), 277–279. PubMed
Goebl, W., & Palmer, C. (2009). Synchronization of timing and motion among performing musicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26(5), 427–438.
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F., Westfall, P., Heiberger, R. M., Schuetzenmeister, A., Scheibe, S., & Hothorn, M. T. (2017). Package ‘multcomp’. http://cran.statsfuca/web/packages/multcomp/multcomp.
Hove, M. J., & Keller, P. E. (2010). Spatiotemporal relations and movement trajectories in visuomotor synchronization. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 15–26.
Hove, M. J., & Risen, J. L. (2009). It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition, 27(6), 949.
Hove, M. J., Spivey, M. J., & Krumhansl, C. L. (2010). Compatibility of motion facilitates visuomotor synchronization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1525. PubMed
Janata, P., Tomic, S. T., & Haberman, J. M. (2012). Sensorimotor coupling in music and the psychology of the groove. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141(1), 54.
Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459. PubMed
Keller, P. E., & Appel, M. (2010). Individual differences, auditory imagery, and the coordination of body movements and sounds in musical ensembles. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(1), 27–46.
Konvalinka, I., Vuust, P., Roepstorff, A., & Frith, C. D. (2010). Follow you, follow me: continuous mutual prediction and adaptation in joint tapping. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2220–2230. PubMed
Krause, V., Pollok, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2010). Perception in action: the impact of sensory information on sensorimotor synchronization in musicians and non-musicians. Acta Psychologica, 133(1), 28–37. PubMed
Large, E. W. (2000). On synchronizing movements to music. Human movement Science, 19(4), 527–566.
Large, E. W., Fink, P., & Kelso, J. A. (2002). Tracking simple and complex sequences. Psychological Research, 66(1), 3–17. PubMed
Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. Psychological REVIEW, 106(1), 119.
Launay, J., Dean, R. T., & Bailes, F. (2014). Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability. Cognitive Processing, 15(4), 491–501. PubMed
Loehr, J. D., & Palmer, C. (2011). Temporal coordination between performing musicians. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(11), 2153–2167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.603427. PubMed
London, J. (2012). Hearing in time: Psychological aspects of musical meter: Oxford University Press.
Luck, G., & Nte, S. (2007). An investigation of conductors’ temporal gestures and conductor–musician synchronization, and a first experiment. Psychology of Music.
Mates, J., Radil, T., & Pöppel, E. (1992). Cooperative tapping: Time control under different feedback conditions. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(6), 691–704.
Matlab, M. (1999). Natick, MA: Mathworks.
Mills, P. F., Harry, B., Stevens, C. J., Knoblich, G., & Keller, P. E. (2018). Intentionality of a co-actor influences sensorimotor synchronisation with a virtual partner. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1747021818796183.
Mills, P. F., van der Steen, M. M., Schultz, B. G., & Keller, P. E. (2015). Individual differences in temporal anticipation and adaptation during sensorimotor synchronization. Timing & Time Perception, 3(1–2), 13–31.
Nowicki, L., Prinz, W., Grosjean, M., Repp, B. H., & Keller, P. E. (2013). Mutual adaptive timing in interpersonal action coordination. Psychomusicology: Music, Mind, and Brain, 23(1), 6.
Nozaradan, S., Peretz, I., & Mouraux, A. (2012). Selective neuronal entrainment to the beat and meter embedded in a musical rhythm. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(49), 17572–17581. PubMed
Palmer, C. (2013). Music performance: Movement and coordination. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The psychology of music (3rd Ed) (pp. 405–422). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Pecenka, N., & Keller, P. E. (2011). The role of temporal prediction abilities in interpersonal sensorimotor synchronization. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 505–515. PubMed
Pfordresher, P. Q. (2003). Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 949. PubMed
Puckette, M., & Zicarelli, D. (1990). Max/Msp. Cycling, 74, 1990–2006.
R Core Team. (2013). R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
R Foundation for Statistical Computing (version 3.5.1), Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 25 August 2018.
Repp, B. H. (2005). Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(6), 969–992.
Repp, B. H. (2006). Does an auditory distractor sequence affect self-paced tapping? Acta Psychol(Amst), 121(1), 81–107.
Schultz, B. G. (2018). The Schultz MIDI Benchmarking Toolbox for MIDI interfaces, percussion pads, and sound cards. Behavior Research Methods, 1–31.
Schultz, B. G., & Demos, A. P. (In prepration.). The Discrete to Dynamic Oscillation Conversion Toolbox: A dynamic measure of coordination. Behavior Research Methods.
Schultz, B. G., & van Vugt, F. T. (2015). Tap Arduino: An Arduino microcontroller for low-latency auditory feedback in sensorimotor synchronization experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 1–17.
Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367. PubMed
Shaffer, L. H. (1982). Rhythm and timing in skill. Psychological Review, 89(2), 109–122. PubMed
Stupacher, J., Maes, P.-J., Witte, M., & Wood, G. (2017). Music strengthens prosocial effects of interpersonal synchronization – If you move in time with the beat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.04.007.
Zamm, A., Wellman, C., & Palmer, C. (2016). Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(5), 611. PubMed
- The roles of musical expertise and sensory feedback in beat keeping and joint action
Benjamin G. Schultz
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
An International Journal of Perception, Attention, Memory, and Action
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772