Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Previous studies using Olson’s Circumplex Model and FACES IV, the self-report assessing family functioning, did not clarify the role of rigidity, a dimension of this model. Rigidity emerged as ambiguous: it was considered either as a functional or as a dysfunctional dimension. Building upon the results of previous studies, we provided a contribution intended to disambiguate the role of rigidity considering adolescents’ perceptions and using a non-a priori classification analysis. 320 Italian adolescents (13–21 years) participated in this study and responded to a questionnaire containing scales of the study variables. A latent class analysis was performed to identify the association of rigidity with the other dimensions of Olson’s model and with indicators of adaptive family functioning in adolescence: parental monitoring and family satisfaction. We found six clusters corresponding to family typologies and having different levels of functioning. Rigidity emerged as adaptive in the typologies named rigidly balanced and flexibly oscillating; it was associated with positive dimensions of family functioning, i.e. flexibility, cohesion, parental monitoring, and high levels of family satisfaction. Differently, when rigidity was associated with disengagement, low cohesion and flexibility, and lack of parental supervision, emerged as maladaptive. This was the case of two typologies: the rigidly disengaged and the chaotically disengaged. Adolescents of these families reported the lowest levels of satisfaction. In the two last typologies, the flexibly chaotic and the cohesively disorganized, rigidity indicated a mid-range functionality as these families were characterized by emotional connectedness but lack of containment. Clinical implications are discussed.
Baiocco, R., Cacioppo, M., Laghi, F., & Tafà, M. (2013). Factorial and construct validity of FACES IV among Italian adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies,22, 962–970. CrossRef
Eshghi, A., Haughton, D., Legrand, P., Skaletsky, M., & Woolford, S. (2011). Identifying groups: A comparison of methodologies. Journal of Data Science,9, 271–291.
Everitt, B. S., Landau, S., Morven, L., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analyses (5th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley. CrossRef
Everri, M., Mancini, T., & Fruggeri, L. (in press). Disentangling parental monitoring: Disentangling parental monitoring: The role of family communication in achieving parental knowledge. Psicologia Sociale.
Franklin, C., Streeter, C. L., & Springer, D. W. (2001). Validity of the FACES IV family assessment measure. Research on Social Work Practice,11, 576–596. CrossRef
Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
Henry, C. S., Robinson, L. C., Neal, R. A., & Erron, L. H. (2008). Adolescents’ perception of overall family system functioning and parental behaviors. Journal of Child and Family Studies,15, 319–329.
Laird, R. D., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2007). Developmental trajectories and antecedents of distal parental supervision. Journal of Early Adolescence,29, 258–284. CrossRef
Loriedo, C., Di Nuovo, S., & Visani, E. (2013). FACES IV: Reliability and validity in an adult Italian sample. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations. http://www.facesiv.com.
Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2001). Latent class factorand cluster models, bi-plots and related graphical displays. Sociological Methodology 2001 (pp. 223–264). Cambridge: Blackwell.
Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: a comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research,20, 36–43.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miranda, M. C., Bacchini, D., & Affuso, G. (2012). Validazione di uno strumento per la validazione del parental monitoring in un campione di adolescenti italiani. Giornale di Psicologia dello Sviluppo,101, 32–47.
Mirnics, Z., Vargha, A., Tóth, M., & Bagdy, E. (2010). Cross-cultural applicability of FACES IV. Journal of Family Psychotherapy,21, 17–33. CrossRef
Mupinga, E. E., Garrison, M. E. B., & Pierce, S. H. (2002). An exploratory study of the relationships between family functioning and parenting styles: The perceptions of mothers of young grade school children. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal,31, 112–129. CrossRef
Murphy, J., Shevlin, M., & Adamson, G. (2007). A latent class analysis of positive psychosis symptoms based on the British Psychiatric Morbidity Survey. Personality and Individual Differences,42, 491–1502. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling,14, 535–569. CrossRef
Olson, D. H., & Gorall, D. M. (2006). Faces IV and the Circumplex model. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations.
Olson, D. H., Russell, C. S., & Sprenkle, D. H. (1989). Circumplex model: Systematic assessment and treatment of families. New York, NY: Haworth Press.
Rivero, N., Martínez-Pampliega, A., & Olson, D. (2010). Spanish adaptation of the FACES IV Questionnaire: Psychometric characteristics. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families,18, 288–296. CrossRef
Wang, B., Stanton, B., Li, X., Cottrell, L., Deveaux, L., & Kaljee, L. (2013). The influence of parental monitoring and parent–adolescent communication on Bahamian adolescent risk involvement: A three-year longitudinal examination. Social Science and Medicine,96, 161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.08.013. CrossRef
Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking Families. London: Calouste Gulbenkin Foundation.
- The Role of Rigidity in Adaptive and Maladaptive Families Assessed by FACES IV: The Points of View of Adolescents
- Springer US