Skip to main content
Log in

Microtransitions and the Dynamics of Family Functioning

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a qualitative observational study aimed at exploring microtransitions in the relational dynamics of family functioning when the children are adolescents. Three concurrent levels were considered central for family functioning in this period: the acknowledgment of emerging competences, the redefinition of the power structure, and the regulation of interpersonal distances. Twenty-eight non-clinical Italian families with at least one adolescent child were interviewed and video-recorded in their homes. A stance-taking process analysis was carried out on the family interactive sequences arising in the course of the interviews. This analysis was based on the stances taken by all family members in relation to their reciprocal evaluations, positions, and alignments, which allowed us to point out the interlocking of competences, power and distances. Out of all the possible theoretical combinations of these three dimensions, we identified four forms of interaction. In two forms, the emerging changes were not incorporated in the families’ interactive repertoires by either reconfirming family stability or resisting family changes. In these ways of interacting competences, power, and distances were not reorganized. In the other two forms, instead, family microtransitions were observable in the extent to which family members either explored family changes or legitimated family reorganizations. In these processes, they could redefine and readdress their ways of interacting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The technique was partly borrowed from the circular interviewing developed for systemic family therapy (Selvini Palazzoli et al. 1980).

References

  • Arcidiacono, F., & Pontecorvo, C. (2009). Cultural practices in Italian family conversations: verbal conflict between parents and preadolescents. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 97–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsson, K., & Cekaite, A. (2011). Activity contracts and directives in everyday family politics. Discourse & Society, 2, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baril, M. E., Crouter, A. C., & McHale, S. M. (2007). Processes linking adolescent well-being, marital love, and coparenting. Journal of Family Psychology, 21, 645–654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, W., & Grossens, L. (2008). Dynamics of perceived parenting and identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 165–184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breunlin, D. (1988). Oscillation theory and family development. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions. Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 133–158). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claes, M., Perchec, C., Miranda, D., Benoit, A., Bariaud, F., Lanz, M., et al. (2011). Adolescents’ Perceptions of parental practices: a cross-national comparison of Canada, France, and Italy. Journal of Adolescence, 34, 225–238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. A., & Laursen, B. (2004). Parent-adolescent relationships and influences. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 331–361). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowan, P. A. (1991). Individual and family life transitions: a proposal for a new definition. In P. A. Cowan & M. Hetherington (Eds.), Family transitions (pp. 3–30). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, J. W. (2007). The stance triangle. In R. Englebretson (Ed.), Stancetaking in discourse. Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction (pp. 140–182). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Everri, M. (2011). Le microtransizioni nelle famiglie con figli adolescenti. Un gioco di equilibri. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia dello Sviluppo, 99, 91–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, A. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of youth and young adulthood. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grotevant, H. D., & Cooper, C. R. (1985). Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence. Child Development, 56, 415–428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grych, J. H., Raynor, S. R., & Fosco, G. M. (2004). Family processes that shape the impact of interparental conflict on adolescents. Development and Psychopathology, 16, 649–665.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & van Langenhove, L. (1999). Introducing positioning theory. In R. Harré & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory (pp. 14–31). Oxford: Blackwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartup, W. W., & Laursen, B. (1991). Relationships as developmental contexts. In R. Cohen & A. W. Siegel (Eds.), Context and development (pp. 253–279). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. S., Sager, D. W., & Plunkett, S. W. (1996). Adolescents’ perceptions of family system characteristics, parent-adolescent dyadic behaviors, adolescent qualities, and adolescent empathy. Family Relations, 45, 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmbeck, N. G. (1996). A model of family relational transformations during the transition to adolescence: parent-adolescent conflict and adaptation. In J. A. Graber, J. Brooks-Gunn, & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Transitions through adolescence. Interpersonal domains and context (pp. 36–65). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerig, P. K., & Lindahl, K. M. (2001). Family observational coding system: Resources for systemic research. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreppner, K. (2002). Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families as systems. In J. P. McHale & W. S. Groenick (Eds.), Retrospect and prospect in the psychological study of families (pp. 164–186). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreppner, K. (2005). Family assessment and methodological issues. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 4, 249–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari, L., Everri, M., & Fruggeri, L. (2010). Family micro-transitions: observing the process of change in families with adolescent children. Family Process, 49, 236–250.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ochs, E., & Taylor, C. (1996). “The father knows best dynamic” in family dinner narratives. In K. Hall (Ed.), Gender articulated: Language and the socially constructed self (pp. 99–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (2000). Circumplex model of marital and family systems. Journal of Family Therapy, 22, 144–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, D. (1981). The family’s construction of reality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatelli, R. M., & Anderson, S. A. (1991). Family dynamics, peer relationships, and adolescents’ psychological adjustment. Family Relations, 40, 363–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sameroff, A. J., & Seifer, R. (1983). Familial risk and child competence. Child Development, 54, 1254–1268.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing, circularity, neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19, 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, E. R. (1988). Individual change and family development: individuation as a family process. In C. J. Falicov (Ed.), Family transitions. Continuity and change over the life cycle (pp. 159–180). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. (Ed.) (2005). Changing boundaries of parental authority during adolescence. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, n. 108.

  • Sprenkle, D. H., & Piercy, F. P. (2005). Research methods in family therapy. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stattin, H., Persson, S., Burk, W., & Kerr, M. (2011). Adolescents’ perceptions of the democratic functioning in their families. European Psychologist, 16, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, J., Goodwin, C., & Le Baron, C. (Eds.). (2011). Embodied interactions. Language and body in the material world. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marina Everri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Everri, M., Fruggeri, L. & Molinari, L. Microtransitions and the Dynamics of Family Functioning. Integr. psych. behav. 48, 61–78 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9248-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-013-9248-9

Keywords

Navigation