Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 7/2021

12-11-2020 | Original Article

The impact of encoding scenarios on different forms of temporal order memory

Auteur: Signy Sheldon

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 7/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This study investigated the impact of encoding scenarios on sequential memory, specifcally testing the benefit of imagining a spatial context when learning a list of items. In Experiment 1, participants studied sequences of visually presented items after imagining a spatial context or a preparatory cue. At test, participants made recency judgments (Which came first?) on pairs of items from the studied sequences. These test pairs varied in the studied temporal distance (studied with 0, 1 or 2 intervening items between the pair) and whether presented in a manner that was ‘spatially congruent’ with their studied order. A congruent test pair was one in which the first item from the sequence was presented on the left and the second item presented on the right. The results were that imagining a spatial context at encoding led to more accurate recency judgments than when no encoding context was provided. In addition, test pairs that included items studied farther apart (2 intervening items) were more accurately judged than test pairs with items studied closer together (0 or 1 intervening items). Experiment 2 utilized the same design to compare the effect of imagining a spatial context versus elaborating on a concept when encoding item sequences. Interestingly, the effect of these encoding contexts on recency judgments depended on both the temporal distance and congruency of the test pairs. Imagining a spatial context at encoding led to more accurate recency judgments than when thinking about a concept at encoding for incongruent test pairs and congruent test pairs studied without intervening items. These findings provide new insight into how encoding strategies, specifically those that recruit imagining spatial contexts, alter the way temporal associations are retrieved from memory.
Literatuur
go back to reference Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123. CrossRef Anderson, J. R., & Bower, G. H. (1972). Recognition and retrieval processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 79, 97–123. CrossRef
go back to reference Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1988). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Bjork, R. A., & Richardson-Klavehn, A. (1988). On the puzzling relationship between environmental context and human memory. In C. Izawa (Ed.), Current issues in cognitive processes: The Tulane Flowerree symposium on cognition (pp. 313–344). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Bouffard, N., Stokes, J., Kramer, H. J., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2018). Temporal encoding strategies result in boosts to final free recall performance comparable to spatial ones. Memory & Cognition, 46(1), 17–31. (Https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0742-z).CrossRef Bouffard, N., Stokes, J., Kramer, H. J., & Ekstrom, A. D. (2018). Temporal encoding strategies result in boosts to final free recall performance comparable to spatial ones. Memory & Cognition, 46(1), 17–31. (Https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0742-z).CrossRef
go back to reference Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.CrossRef Brown, G. D. A., Neath, I., & Chater, N. (2007). A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review, 114, 539–576.CrossRef
go back to reference Caplan, J. B. (2015). Order-memory and association-memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 221–232.CrossRef Caplan, J. B. (2015). Order-memory and association-memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(3), 221–232.CrossRef
go back to reference Clewett, D., & Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186–193.CrossRef Clewett, D., & Davachi, L. (2017). The ebb and flow of experience determines the temporal structure of memory. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 17, 186–193.CrossRef
go back to reference DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2016). Temporal binding within and across events. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 134, 107–114.CrossRef DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2016). Temporal binding within and across events. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 134, 107–114.CrossRef
go back to reference Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243–252.CrossRef Ezzyat, Y., & Davachi, L. (2011). What constitutes an episode in episodic memory? Psychological Science, 22(2), 243–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College. (Original work published i 885; paperback ed., New York: Dover, 1964) Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Memory (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Teachers College. (Original work published i 885; paperback ed., New York: Dover, 1964)
go back to reference Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95–112.CrossRef Glenberg, A. M. (1979). Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 7, 95–112.CrossRef
go back to reference Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 299–306.CrossRef Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Deconstructing episodic memory with construction. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 299–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Heusser, A. C., Ezzyat, Y., Shiff, I., & Davachi, L. (2018). Perceptual boundaries cause mnemonic trade-offs between local boundary processing and across-trial associative binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(7), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000503CrossRef Heusser, A. C., Ezzyat, Y., Shiff, I., & Davachi, L. (2018). Perceptual boundaries cause mnemonic trade-offs between local boundary processing and across-trial associative binding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(7), 1075–1090. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​xlm0000503CrossRef
go back to reference Jenkins, L. J., & Ranganath, C. (2010). Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(46), 15558–15565.CrossRef Jenkins, L. J., & Ranganath, C. (2010). Prefrontal and medial temporal lobe activity at encoding predicts temporal context memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(46), 15558–15565.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
go back to reference Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99(3), 418–439.CrossRef Johnson-Laird, P. N., Byrne, R. M., & Schaeken, W. (1992). Propositional reasoning by model. Psychological Review, 99(3), 418–439.CrossRef
go back to reference Polyn, S. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 24–30.CrossRef Polyn, S. M., & Kahana, M. J. (2008). Memory search and the neural representation of context. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(1), 24–30.CrossRef
go back to reference Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116, 129–156.CrossRef Polyn, S. M., Norman, K. A., & Kahana, M. J. (2009). A context maintenance and retrieval model of organizational processes in free recall. Psychological Review, 116, 129–156.CrossRef
go back to reference Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 269–272.CrossRef Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(4), 269–272.CrossRef
go back to reference Roediger, H. L. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6(5), 558–567. (Https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558). Roediger, H. L. (1980). The effectiveness of four mnemonics in ordering recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6(5), 558–567. (Https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.6.5.558).
go back to reference Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220. (Https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157).CrossRef Smith, S. M., & Vela, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203–220. (Https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196157).CrossRef
go back to reference Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236.CrossRef Swallow, K. M., Zacks, J. M., & Abrams, R. A. (2009). Event boundaries in perception affect memory encoding and updating. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(2), 236.CrossRef
go back to reference Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 426–430.CrossRef Weger, U. W., & Pratt, J. (2008). Time flies like an arrow: space-time compatibility effects suggest the use of a mental timeline. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15(2), 426–430.CrossRef
go back to reference Yates, F. A. (2014). The art of memory. London: The Bodley Head. Yates, F. A. (2014). The art of memory. London: The Bodley Head.
go back to reference Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 979–1008.CrossRef Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cognitive Science, 28(6), 979–1008.CrossRef
go back to reference Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297.CrossRef Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6(5), 292–297.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
The impact of encoding scenarios on different forms of temporal order memory
Auteur
Signy Sheldon
Publicatiedatum
12-11-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 7/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01440-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2021

Psychological Research 7/2021 Naar de uitgave