Abstract
Spacing repetitions generally facilitates memory for the repeated events. This article describes a theory of spacing effects that uses the same principles to account for both facilitatory and inhibitory effects of spacing in a number of memory paradigms. Increasing the spacing between repetitions is assumed to result in the storage of greater amounts of information of three types or levels: contextual, structural (associative), and descriptive. Contextual information is encoded automatically, while the encoding of the structural and descriptive information depends on control processes utilized. Remembering involves accessing the stored information using retrieval cues containing information on any level that matches the stored information. The ultimate effectiveness of the spacing is controlled by this matching between the retrieval cues and the stored information. Previous experiments demonstrating the operation of these principles on the structural and descriptive levels are reviewed. Three new experiments are reported that illustrate interactions between stored information and retrieval cues based on contextual information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References Note
Medin, D. L. Paper presented in R. A. Bjork (Chair),Symposium on spacing phenomena in memory. Symposium presented at the Mathematical Psychology meetings, Ann Arbor, 1974.
Wichawut, C.Encoding variability and the effect of spacing of repetition in continuous recognition memory (Tech. Rep. 35). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Human Performance Center, 1972.
References
Abernethy, E. M. The effect of changed environmental conditions upon the results of college examinations.Journal of Psychology, 1940,10, 293–301.
Anderson, J. R. Fran: A simulation model of free recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 5). New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H.Human associative memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1973.
Anderson, J. R., &Bower, G. H. A propositional theory of recognition memory.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 406–412.
Atkinson, R. C., &Shiffrin, R. M. Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. In K. W. Spence & J. T. Spence (Eds.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 2). New York: Academic Press, 1968.
Bjork, R. A. Short-term storage: The ordered output of a central processor. In F. Restle, R. M. Shiffrin, N. J. Castellan, H. R. Lindman, & D. B. Pisoni (Eds.),Cognitive theory (Vol. 2). Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1975.
Bjork, R. A., &Whitten, W. B. Recency-sensitive retrieval processes in long-term free recall.Cognitive Psychology, 1974,6, 173–189.
Bower, G. H. Stimulus-sampling theory of encoding variability. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.
Craik, F. I. M., &Lockhart, R. S. Levels of processing: A framework for memory research.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972,11, 671–684.
D’Agostino, P. R., &Deremer, P. Repetition effects as a function of rehearsal and encoding variability.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973,12, 108–113.
Deremer, P., &D’Agostino, P. R. Locus of distributed lag effect in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1974,13, 167–171.
Earhard, B., &Landry, D. Dual vs. single encoding in recognition memory as a function of lag, delay, and availability of semantic information.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 609–615.
Estes, W. K. Statistical theory of spontaneous recovery and regression.Psychological Review, 1955,62, 145–154.
Flexser, A. J., &Tulving, E. Retrieval independence in recognition and recall.Psychological Review, 1978,85, 153–171.
Glenberg, A. M. Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 1–16.
Glenberg, A. M. Influences of retrieval processes on the spacing effect in free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1977,3, 282–294.
Glenberg, A. M., & Bradley, M. K. Mental contiguity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, in press.
Greeno, J. G. How associations are memorized. In D. A. Norman (Ed.),Models of human memory. New York: Academic Press, 1970.
Hintzman, D. L. Recognition time: Effects of recency, frequency, and the spacing of repetitions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1969,79, 192–194.
Hintzman, D. L. Theoretical implications of the spacing effect. In R. L. Solso (Ed.),Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1974.
Hintzman, D. L. Repetition and memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 10). New York: Academic Press, 1976.
Johnston, W. A., &Uhl, C. N. The contribution of encoding effort and variability to the spacing effect on free recall.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1976,2, 153–160.
Kintsch, W. Recognition learning as a function of the length of the retention interval and changes in the retention interval.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1966,3, 412–433.
Kintsch, W.The representation of meaning in memory. New York: Wiley, 1974.
Kintsch, W. On comprehending stores. In M. A. Just & P. A. Carpenter (Eds.),Cognitive processes in comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum, 1978.
Landauer, T. K. Memory without organization: Properties of a model with random storage and undirected retrieval.Cognitive Psychology, 1975,7, 495–531.
Lockhart, R. S., Craik, S. I. M., &Jacoby, L. L. Depth of processing, recognition, and recall: Some aspects of a general memory system. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. London: Wiley, 1976.
Madigan, D. A. Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 828–835.
Mandler, G. Organization and recognition. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.),Organization of memory. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
Maskarinec, A. S., &Thompson, C. P. The within-list distributed practice effect: Tests of varied context and varied encoding hypothesis.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 741–747.
Melton, A. W. The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1970,9, 596–606.
Peterson, L. R., Hillner, K., &Saltzman, T. Supplementary report: Time between pairing and short-term retention.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1962,64, 550–581.
Peterson, L. R., Wampler, R., Kirkpatrick, M., &Saltzman, D. Effect of spacing of presentations on retention of a pairedassociate over short intervals.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1963,66, 206–209.
Reder, L. M., Anderson, J. R., &Bjork, R. A. A semantic interpretation of encoding specificity.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1974,102, 648–656.
Shaughnessy, J. J. Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 369–377.
Shaughnessy, J. J., Zimmerman, J., &Underwood, B. J. The spacing effect in the learning of word pairs and the components of word pairs.Memory & Cognition, 1974,2, 742–748.
Smith, S., &Guthrie, E. R.General psychology in terms of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century, 1924.
Smith, S. M., Glenberg, A., &Bjork, R. A. Environmental context and human memory.Memory & Cognition, 1978,6, 342–353.
Stein, B. S. Depth of processing reexamined: The effects of the precision of encoding and test appropriateness.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1978,17, 165–174.
Thios, S. J., &D’Agostino, P. R. Effects of repetition as a function of study-phase retrieval.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1976,15, 529–537.
TulvLng, E. Theoretical processes in free recall. In T. R. Dixon & D. L. Horton (Eds.),Verbal behavior and general behavior theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
Tulving, E. Ecphoric processes in recall and recognition. In J. Brown (Ed.),Recall and recognition. New York: Wiley, 1976.
Underwood, B. J. Some correlates of item repetition in free recall learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969,8, 83–94.
Underwood, B. J., Kapelak, S. M., &Malmi, R. A. The spacing effect: Additions to the theoretical and empirical puzzles.Memory & Cognition, 1976,4, 391–400.
Wallace, W. P. Clustering in free recall based upon input contiguity.Psychonomic Science, 1969,14, 290–292.
Watkins, O. C., &Watkins, M. J. Buildup of proactive inhibition: A cue overload effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 1975,1, 442–453.
Whitten, W. B., II, &Bjork, R. A. Learning from tests: Effects of spacing.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1977,16, 465–478.
Young, J. L. Reinforcement-test intervals in paired-associate learning.Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1971,8, 58–81.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This research was supported in part by NIMH Grant MH26643.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glenberg, A.M. Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition 7, 95–112 (1979). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197590
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197590