Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Age is often used to determine when children can begin completing patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments or transition to adult instruments. This study’s purpose was to determine relationships between literacy, age, and race and their influence on a child’s ability to understand and complete a PRO instrument.
The Wide Range Achievement Test was used to evaluate literacy in children and young adults with cancer, participating in a cognitive interview for the Pediatric PRO-CTCAE instrument. 140 participants (7–20 years) were recruited from 8 sites. Logistic regression and multivariable liner regression were used to examine relationships among key variables.
Higher literacy scores were significantly associated with fewer PRO-CTCAE items being identified as “hard to understand” (p = 0.017). Literacy scores increased with age, but older participants were more likely to fall behind expected reading levels compared with US norms. A 1-year increase in age was associated with a 19% increase in the likelihood for being below the expected WRAT word reading score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.06–1.33, p = 0.003). No associations were found between race and literacy.
Wide variations in literacy were noted across age groups. All participants were able to complete the Pediatric PRO-CTCAE, although most 7 year olds (63%) required reading assistance. Those with lower literacy skills were able to understand items suggesting that multiple factors may be involved in comprehension (developmental stage, concentration, vocabulary, or prior health experiences). Risk for falling below expected literacy levels increased with age implying a need for literacy consideration for cancer patients.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Hockenberry, M. J., Hinds, P. S., Barrera, P., Bryant, R., Adams-McNeill, J., Hooke, C., Rasco-Baggott, C., Patterson-Kelly, K., Gattuso, J. S., & Manteuffel, B. (2003). Three instruments to assess fatigue in children with cancer: The child, parent and staff perspectives. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 25(4), 319–328. CrossRefPubMed
Whaley, W. J., & Kibby, M. W. (1980). Word synthesis and beginning reading-achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 73(3), 132–138. CrossRef
Conrad, N. J., Harris, N., & Williams, J. (2013). Individual differences in children’s literacy development: The contribution of orthographic knowledge. Reading and Writing, 26(8), 1223–1239. CrossRef
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). How young can children reliably and validly self-report their health-related quality of life? An analysis of 8591 children across age subgroups with the PedsQL (TM) 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5:1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Hutchinson, A. D., Pfeiffer, S. M., & Wilson, C. (2017). Cancer-related cognitive impairment in children. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 11(1), 70–75. PubMed
Lum, A., Wakefield, C. E., Donnan, B., Burns, M. A., Fardell, J. E., & Marshall, G. M. (2017). Understanding the school experiences of children and adolescents with serious chronic illness: A systematic meta-review. Child: Care, Health and Development, 43(5), 645–662.
Reardon, S. F., Valentino, R. A., Kalogrides, D., Shores, K. A., & Greenberg, E. H. (2013). Patterns and trends in racial academic chievement gaps among states, 1999–2011.
Paschall, K. W., Gershoff, E. T., & Kuhfeld, M. (2018). A two decade examination of historical race/ethnicity disparities in academic achievement by poverty status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47(6), 1164–1177. CrossRef
Reeve, B. B., McFatrich, M., Pinheiro, L. C., Weaver, M. S., Sung, L., Withycombe, J. S., et al. (2017). Eliciting the child’s voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: Cognitive interview findings from the pediatric patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events initiative. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 64(3), e26261. CrossRef
Reeve, B. B., Withycombe, J. S., Baker, J. N., Hooke, M. C., Lyons, J. C., Mowbray, C., et al. (2013). The first step to integrating the child’s voice in adverse event reporting in oncology trials: A content validation study among pediatric oncology clinicians. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 60(7), 1231–1236. CrossRef
Basch, E., Reeve, B. B., Mitchell, S. A., Clauser, S. B., Minasian, L. M., Dueck, A. C., et al. (2014). Development of the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju244. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Dueck, A. C., Mendoza, T. R., Mitchell, S. A., Reeve, B. B., Castro, K. M., Rogak, L. J., et al. (2015). Validity and reliability of the US National cancer institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncology, 1(8), 1051–1059. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Reeve, B. B., McFatrich, M., Pinheiro, L. C., Freyer, D. R., Basch, E. M., Baker, J. N., et al. (2017). Cognitive interview-based validation of the patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events in adolescents with cancer. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 53(4), 759–766. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test-4 (WRAT-4). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. (2009). Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
Matza, L. S., Patrick, D. L., Riley, A. W., Alexander, J. J., Rajmil, L., Pleil, A. M., et al. (2013). Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value Health, 16(4), 461–479. CrossRefPubMed
The Nation’s Report Card: 2015 mathematics & reading at Grade 12. National assessment of educational progress.
MacMillan, P. (2000). Simultaneous measurement of reading growth, gender, and relative-age effects: Many-faceted Rasch applied to CBM reading scores. Journal of Applied Measurement, 1(4), 393–408. PubMed
Krull, K. R., Hockenberry, M. J., Miketova, P., Carey, M., & Moore, I. M. (2013). Chemotherapy-related changes in central nervous system phospholipids and neurocognitive function in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia & Lymphoma, 54(3), 535–540. CrossRef
Fryer, R. G., & Levitt, S. D. (2004). Understanding the black-white test score gap in the first two years of school. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(2), 447–464. CrossRef
Clotfelter, C. T., Ladd, H. F., & Vigdor, J. L. (2009). The academic achievement gap in grades 3 to 8. Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(2), 398–419. CrossRef
- The association of age, literacy, and race on completing patient-reported outcome measures in pediatric oncology
Janice S. Withycombe
Pamela S. Hinds
Frank G. Keller
Justin N. Baker
Jenny W. Mack
Mia K. Waldron
Bryce B. Reeve
- Springer International Publishing