Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of vocabulary knowledge on novel word identification

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study investigated the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and novel word reading. Fourth-grade students were assessed on standardized measures of word identification, decoding, and receptive vocabulary, as well as on an experimental word identification measure using words that students in the fourth grade are unlikely to have seen before in print. In the experimental measure, pairs of words were matched on printed frequency and orthographic pattern (with a variety of spelling patterns represented), but differed in terms of the frequency of expected oral exposure for children (i.e., higher vs. lower). Results showed that students’ receptive vocabulary knowledge was significantly related to performance on both the standardized and experimental measures of word identification, even after accounting for the substantial amount of variance explained by decoding ability. Students performed better reading the words with higher expected oral frequencies on the experimental task than on those items with lower expected oral frequencies. The results point to the benefits, albeit modest, of oral word familiarity for reading words when they are first encountered in print and suggest that this top-down effect is not limited to exception words, as has been suggested, but has a wider scope.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Because the term “word identification” is used in differing ways in the literature, we want to clarify that in this study it pertains to words read aloud correctly, both on the standardized Word Identification task that was administered and on the experimental measure, with no implications regarding retrieval of word meaning.

References

  • Biemiller, A. (2001). Vocabulary development and instruction: A prerequisite for school learning. In S. Neumann & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A. (2005). Size and sequence in vocabulary development: Implications for choosing words for primary grade vocabulary instruction. In E. H. Hiebert & M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice (pp. 223–242). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biemiller, A., & Slonim, N. (2001). Estimating root word vocabulary growth in normative and advantaged populations: Evidence for a common sequence of vocabulary acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(3), 498–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J. A. (2001). Does poor exception word reading reflect vocabulary deficits? Australian Journal of Psychology, 53, 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowey, J., & Muller, D. (2005). Phonological recoding and rapid orthographic learning in third graders silent reading: A critical test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92(3), 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer-Crane, C., Snowling, M. J., Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Carroll, J. M., Miles, J., et al. (2008). Improving early language and literacy skills: Differential effects of an oral language versus a phonology with reading intervention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(3), 226–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S., Jacobs, V. A., & Baldwin, L. E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, M., & Leahy, J. (1996). Assessment of lexical and nonlexical reading abilities in children: Some normative data. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48(3), 136–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, F. J., Fieldsend, E., Bowyer-Crane, C., Hulme, C., Smith, G., Gibbs, S., et al. (2008). Reading with vocabulary intervention: evaluation of an instruction for children with poor response to reading intervention. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(3), 319–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, L. (2005). The essence of multivariate thinking: Basic themes and methods. Mahwah: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harm, M., & Seidenberg, M. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemphill, L., & Tivnan, T. (2008). The importance of early vocabulary for literacy achievement in high-poverty schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13(4), 426–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, R. F., Pullen, P. C., Lane, H. B., & Torgesen, J. K. (2009). The complex nature of reading fluency: A multidimensional view. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 25(1), 4–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Information Works. (2008). Using information. Retrieved March 9, 2009 from http://www.infoworks.ride.uri.edu/2008.

  • Kamil, M. L. (2004). Vocabulary and comprehension instruction: Summary and implications of the national reading panel findings. In P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 213–234). Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing. Retrieved March 20, 2009 from www.csa.com.

  • Keenan, J. M., & Betjemann, R. S. (2007). Comprehension of single words: The role of semantics in reading and reading disability. In E. Gregorenko & A. Naples (Eds.), Single word reading (pp. 191–210). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, J. R., Desrochers, A., Roth, L., & Lai, S. S. V. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne. Special Issue: Literacy Development in Canada, 49(2), 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krensky, S. (2001). The history of the English language. In L. Gutlohn, L. Diamond, & B. J. Thorsnes (Eds.), Reading research anthology: The why? of reading instruction (2nd ed.). Washington: Arena Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lété, B., Peereman, R., & Fayol, M. (2008). Consistency and word-frequency effects on spelling among first- to fifth-grade French children: A regression-based study. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(4), 952–977.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKague, M., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M. B. (2001). The effect of oral vocabulary on reading visually novel words: A comparison of the dual-route-cascaded and triangle frameworks. Cognition, 80(3), 231–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moats, L. (2010). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, W. E., & Anderson, R. C. (1984). How many words are there in printed school English? Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1), 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Beyond phonological skills: Broader language skills contribute to the development of reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 27(4), 342–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769).

  • Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 39, 554–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. P., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: how oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story? Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven (Ed.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Philadelphia: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103(1), 56–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough, H. S. (2001). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In S. Neumann & D. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook for research in early literacy (pp. 97–110). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senechal, M., & LeFevre, J. (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study. Child Development, 73(2), 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: a direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 95–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2004). Orthographic learning at a glance. On the time course and developmental onset of self-teaching. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87, 267–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Share, D. L. (2011). On the role of phonology in reading acquisition. In S. A. Brady, D. Braze, & C. A. Fowler (Eds.), Explaining individual differences in reading: Theory and evidence (pp. 45–68). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sipala, C. (2009). Studying the development of word recognition using a pseudoword task. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B. Sciences and Engineering, 5858. Retrieved June 05, 2011 from http://search.proquest.com/docview/622297631?accountid=28991.

  • Stanovich, K. (1984). The interactive-compensatory model of reading: a confluence of developmental, experimental, and educational psychology. RASE: Remedial and Special Education, 5(3), 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumutka, B., Brady, S., & Scarborough, H. (2005). The role of vocabulary knowledge in decoding new words. Presented at the 12th Annual Society for the Scientific Study of Reading Conference in Toronto, Canada.

  • Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). The relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., van Leeuwe, J., & Vermeer, A. (2011). Vocabulary growth and reading development across the elementary school years. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 8–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, T. G., Graves, M. F., & Slater, W. H. (1990). Growth of reading vocabulary in diverse elementary schools: Decoding and word meaning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 281–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wise, J. C., Sevcik, R. A., Morris, R. D., Lovett, M. W., & Wolf, M. (2007). The relationship among receptive and expressive vocabulary, listening comprehension, pre-reading skills, word identification skills, and reading comprehension by children with reading abilities. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(4), 1093–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W. (1998). Woodcock reading mastery tests-revised normative update: Examiners manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeno, S. M., Ivens, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster: Touchstone Applied Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was conducted as part of the first author’s master’s thesis research project. We gratefully acknowledge the help of Drs. Charles Collyer, JoAnn Hammadou, Susan Loftus, Hollis Scarborough, Amy Weiss, and anonymous reviewers for their helpful input regarding the study and the manuscript. In addition, we thank the principal, teachers, and students for their cooperative participation, and Jenlyn Furey and Rachel Jones for their valuable assistance with data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison M. Mitchell.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 6 Estimates of printed frequency for word pairs on the experimental word identification task

Appendix 2

Table 7 Student performance on word pairs in the experimental word identification task (N = 55)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mitchell, A.M., Brady, S.A. The effect of vocabulary knowledge on novel word identification. Ann. of Dyslexia 63, 201–216 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0080-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-013-0080-1

Keywords

Navigation