Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-04-2008 | Original Paper

Satisfaction with Components of the Therapeutic Model: Perspectives of Consumers and Professionals

Auteurs: Tammy A. Lazicki, Eric M. Vernberg, Michael C. Roberts, Eric R. Benson

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 2/2008

Abstract

We provide information about consumer and provider perceptions using a mixed-model pilot study within the Intensive Mental Health Project (IMHP), a school-based treatment service for children with SED and their families. Caregiver, youth, and provider questionnaires developed for this project elicited quantitative and qualitative information on treatment satisfaction, therapeutic alliance, and active involvement in treatment. Caregivers and children overall had positive perceptions of the services they received through IMHP. Providers reported very good working relationships with most children and families. Consumers also provided constructive comments about how to improve services. Our results add support to the importance of therapeutic alliance and collaboration, which are guiding principles of the IMHP.

vorige artikel Demonstrating Support for the Formative and Summative Assessment Paradigm in a School-Based Intensive Mental Health Program

volgende artikel Lessons Learned from the Intensive Mental Health Program: A School-based, Community Oriented Program for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances

American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychological Association. (2005). Report of the 2005 Presidential task force on evidence-based practice. Washington, DC: Author.

Anderson, J. A., Rivera, R. V., & Kutash, K. (1998). Measuring consumer satisfaction with children’s mental health services. In M. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 455–481). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Brannan, A. M., Sonnichsen, S. E., & Heflinger, C. A. (1998). Measuring satisfaction with children’s mental health services: Validity and reliability of the satisfaction scales. Evaluation and Program Planning, 19, 131–141.CrossRef

Brinkmeyer, M. Y., Eyberg, S. M., Nguyen, M. L., & Adams, R. W. (2004). Family engagement, consumer satisfaction and treatment outcome in the new era of child and adolescent in-patient psychiatric care. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 9, 1359–1045.CrossRef

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and by design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

DeChillo, N., Koren, P. E., & Schultze, K. H. (1994). From paternalism to partnership: Family and professional collaboration in children’s mental health. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 64, 564–576.PubMedCrossRef

Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.PubMedCrossRef

Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1991). Persuasion and healing. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.

Hoagwood, K., Jensen, P. S., Petti, T., & Burns, B. J. (1996). Outcomes of mental health care for children and adolescents: A comprehensive conceptual model. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 35, 1055–1063.PubMedCrossRef

Herman, S. E., Marcenko, M. O., & Hazel, K. L. (1996). Parents’ perspectives on quality in family support programs. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 23, 156–169.PubMedCrossRef

Jivanjee, P. R., & Friesen, B. J. (1997). Shared expertise: Family participation in interprofessional training. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 5, 205–211.CrossRef

Nabors, L. A., & Prodente, C. A. (2002). Evaluation of outcomes for adolescents receiving school-based mental health services. Children’s Services: Social Policy, Research, and Practice, 5, 105–112.

Nelson, T. D., & Steele, R. G. (2006). Beyond efficacy and effectiveness: A multifaceted approach to treatment evaluation. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 389–397.CrossRef

Rebok, G., Riley, A., Forrest, C., Starfield, B., Green, B., Robertson, J., & Tambor, E. (2001). Elementary school-aged children’s reports of their health: A cognitive interviewing study. Quality of Life Research, 10, 59–70.PubMedCrossRef

Reynolds, A. J., & Robertson, D. L. (2003). School-based early intervention and later child maltreatment in the Chicago longitudinal study. Child Development, 74, 3–24.PubMedCrossRef

Richards, M. M., Bowers, M. J., Lazicki, T., Krall, D., & Jacobs, A.K. (this issue). Caregiver involvement in the Intensive Mental Health Program: Influence on changes in child functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Roberts, M. C., Vernberg, E. M., & Jackson, Y. (2000). Psychotherapy with children and families. In C. R. Snyder & R. E. Ingram (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change (pp. 500–519). New York: Wiley.

Rouse, L. W., MacCabe, N., & Toprac, M. G. (1995). Measuring satisfaction with community-based services for children with severe emotional disturbances: A comparison of questionnaires for children and parents. In C. Liberton, K. Kutash, & R. Friedman (Eds.), The 8th annual research conference proceedings, a system of care for children’s mental health: Expanding the research base (pp. 3–4). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida.

Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., & Henggeler, S. W. (1998). Multisystemic therapy: Changing the natural and service ecologies of adolescents and families. In M. Epstein, K. Kutash, & A. Duchnowski (Eds.), Outcomes for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders and their families: Programs and evaluation best practices (pp. 485–511). Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.

Stormshak, E. A., & Dishion, T. J. (2002). An ecological approach to child and family clinical and counseling psychology. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 5, 197–215.PubMedCrossRef

Vernberg, E. M., Roberts, M. C., & Nyre, J. E. (this issue). The Intensive Mental Health Program: Development and structure of the model of intervention for children with serious emotional disturbances. Journal of Child and Family Studies.

Vernberg, E. M., Roberts, M. C., Randall, C. J., Biggs, B. K., Nyre, J. E., & Jacobs, A. K. (2006). Intensive mental health services for children with serious emotional disturbances through a school-based, community-oriented program. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 11, 417–430.PubMedCrossRef

Young, S. C., Nicholson, J., & Davis, M. (1995). An overview of issues in research on consumer satisfaction with child and adolescent mental health services. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 4, 219–238.CrossRef

Titel: Satisfaction with Components of the Therapeutic Model: Perspectives of Consumers and Professionals
Auteurs: Tammy A. Lazicki
Eric M. Vernberg
Michael C. Roberts
Eric R. Benson
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2008
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 2/2008
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-007-9152-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2008

Enhancing Therapeutic Gains: Examination of Fidelity to the Model for the Intensive Mental Health Program

Lessons Learned from the Intensive Mental Health Program: A School-based, Community Oriented Program for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances

Factors Related to Outcome in a School-based Intensive Mental Health Program: An Examination of Nonresponders

Caregiver Involvement in the Intensive Mental Health Program: Influence on Changes in Child Functioning

Measuring Treatment Outcome for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances: Discriminant Validity and Clinical Significance of the Child and Adolescent Functioning Assessment Scale

The Intensive Mental Health Program: Development and Structure of the Model of Intervention for Children with Serious Emotional Disturbances