Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Op weg naar cultuursensitieve zorg voor oudere ...

volgende artikel Implementatie, effecten en kosten van casemanag...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-04-2014 | Uitgave 2/2014

SamenOud, een model voor geïntegreerde ouderenzorg: studieprotocol van een gerandomiseerde studie naar de effectiviteit betreffende patiëntuitkomsten, kwaliteit van zorg, zorggebruik en kosten

Tijdschrift:: Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie > Uitgave 2/2014

Auteurs:: R. J. Uittenbroek, S. L. W. Spoorenberg, R. Brans, B. Middel, B. P. H. Kremer, S. A. Reijneveld, K. Wynia

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

The original article has been published in BMC Geriatrics 2013, 13:62.

R. J. Uittenbroek and S. L. W. Spoorenberg hebben een gelijke bijdrage geleverd

Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care

Background

Ongoing growth in health care expenditures and changing patterns in the demand for health care challenge societies worldwide. The Chronic Care Model (CCM), combined with classification for care needs based on Kaiser Permanente (KP) Triangle, may offer a suitable framework for change. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effectiveness of Embrace, a population-based model for integrated elderly care, regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care.

Methods

The CCM and the KP Triangle were translated to the Dutch setting and adapted to the full elderly population living in the community. A randomized controlled trial with balanced allocation was designed to test the effectiveness of Embrace. Eligible elderly persons are 75 years and older and enrolled with one of the participating general practitioner practices. Based on scores on the INTERMED-Elderly Self-Assessment and Groningen Frailty Indicator, participants will be stratified into one of three strata: (A) robust; (B) frail; and (C) complex care needs. Next, participants will be randomized per stratum to Embrace or care as usual. Embrace encompasses an Elderly Care Team per general practitioner practice, an Electronic Elderly Record System, decision support instruments, and a self-management support and prevention program – combined with care and support intensity levels increasing from stratum A to stratum C. Primary outcome variables are patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. Data will be collected at baseline, twelve months after starting date, and during the intervention period.

Discussion

This study could provide evidence for the effectiveness of Embrace.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie

Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie bestrijkt het brede wetenschapsgebied van de gerontologie en geriatrie in al zijn facetten, met bijdragen uit de biologische, medische, psychologische en sociale wetenschappen. Bovendien wordt aandacht besteed aan de noodzakelijke wisselwerking tussen gerontologie en geriatrie.

Meer informatie

IOM (Institute of Medicine). Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2012.

Colombo F, Llena-Nozal A, Mercier J, Tjadens F. Help wanted? Providing and paying for long-term care. Paris: OECD; 2011.

OECD. Health reform: meeting the challenge of ageing and multiple morbidities. 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264122314-en (bezocht op 12 december 2012)

Vogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, Gibson TB, Marder WD, Weiss KB, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2007;22(Suppl 3):391–395. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Marengoni A, Angleman S, Melis R, Mangialasche F, Karp A, Garmen A, et al. Aging with multimorbidity: a systematic review of the literature. Ageing Res Rev 2011;10(4):430–439. PubMedCrossRef

Gezondheidsraad. Ouderdom komt met gebreken, geneeskunde en zorg bij oudere met multimorbiditeit. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad, 2008.

World Health Organization. Innovative care for chronic conditions: building blocks for action: global report. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.

Nolte E, Knai C, Hofmarcher M, Conklin A, Erler A, Elissen A, et al. Overcoming fragmentation in health care: chronic care in Austria, Germany and The Netherlands. Health Econ Policy Law 2012;7(1):125–146. PubMedCrossRef

Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380(9836):37–43. PubMedCrossRef

10.

Bayliss EA, Edwards AE, Steiner JF, Main DS. Processes of care desired by elderly patients with multimorbidities. Fam Pract 2008;25(4):287–293. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G. Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(20):2269–2276. PubMedCrossRef

12.

Nolte E, McKee M. Making it happen. In: Nolte E, editor. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. 1st ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008. p. 222–244.

13.

Beswick AD, Rees K, Dieppe P, Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, et al. Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2008;371(9614):725–735. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

14.

Grabowski DC. The cost-effectiveness of noninstitutional long-term care services: review and synthesis of the most recent evidence. Med Care Res Rev 2006;63(1):3–28. PubMedCrossRef

15.

Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood) 2001;20(6):64–78. CrossRef

16.

Nuno R, Coleman K, Bengoa R, Sauto R. Integrated care for chronic conditions: the contribution of the ICCC Framework. Health Policy 2012;105(1):55–64. PubMedCrossRef

17.

Nolte E, McKee M. Integration and chronic care: a review. In: Nolte E, editor. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. 1st ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2008. p. 64–91.

18.

Zwar N, Harris M, Griffith R, Roland M, Dennis S, Powell Davies G, et al. A systematic review of chronic disease management. UNSW: Research Centre for Primary Health Care and Equity, School of Public Health and Community Medicine; 2006.

19.

Singh D, Ham C. Improving care for people with long-term conditions: a review of UK and international frameworks. Birmingham: NHS Institute for Innovation and Improvement; 2006.

20.

Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the Chronic Care Model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28(1):75–85. CrossRef

21.

Adams SG, Smith PK, Allan PF, Anzueto A, Pugh JA, Cornell JE. Systematic review of the Chronic Care Model in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease prevention and management. Arch Intern Med 2007;167(6):551–561. PubMedCrossRef

22.

Mangione-Smith R, Schonlau M, Chan KS, Keesey J, Rosen M, Louis TA, et al. Measuring the effectiveness of a collaborative for quality improvement in pediatric asthma care: does implementing the Chronic Care Model improve processes and outcomes of care? Ambul Pediatr 2005;5(2):75–82. PubMedCrossRef

23.

Piatt GA, Orchard TJ, Emerson S, Simmons D, Songer TJ, Brooks MM, et al. Translating the Chronic Care Model into the community: results from a randomized controlled trial of a multifaceted diabetes care intervention. Diabetes Care 2006;29(4):811–817. PubMedCrossRef

24.

Benedetti R, Flock B, Pedersen S, Ahern M. Improved clinical outcomes for fee-for-service physician practices participating in a diabetes care collaborative. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30(4):187–194. PubMed

25.

Feifer C, Ornstein SM, Nietert PJ, Jenkins RG. System supports for chronic illness care and their relationship to clinical outcomes. Top Health Inf Manage 2001;22(2):65–72. PubMed

26.

Asch SM, Baker DW, Keesey JW, Broder M, Schonlau M, Rosen M, et al. Does the collaborative model improve care for chronic heart failure? Med Care 2005;43(7):667–675. PubMedCrossRef

27.

Tsai AC, Morton SC, Mangione CM, Keeler EB. A meta-analysis of interventions to improve care for chronic illnesses. Am J Manag Care 2005;11(8):478–488. PubMedCentralPubMed

28.

Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002;288(14):1775–1779. PubMedCrossRef

29.

Minkman M, Ahaus K, Huijsman R. Performance improvement based on integrated quality management models: what evidence do we have? A systematic literature review. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19(2):90–104. PubMedCrossRef

30.

Boult C, Reider L, Frey K, Leff B, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, et al. Early effects of ‘Guided Care’ on the quality of health care for multimorbid older persons: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63(3):321–327.

31.

Boyd CM, Boult C, Shadmi E, Leff B, Brager R, Dunbar L, et al. Guided care for multimorbid older adults. Gerontologist 2007;47(5):697–704. PubMedCrossRef

32.

Wolff JL, Giovannetti ER, Boyd CM, Reider L, Palmer S, Scharfstein D, et al. Effects of Guided Care on family caregivers. Gerontologist 2010;50(4):459–470. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

33.

Boyd CM, Reider L, Frey K, Scharfstein D, Leff B, Wolff J, et al. The effects of Guided Care on the perceived quality of health care for multi-morbid older persons: 18-month outcomes from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(3):235–242. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

34.

Boult C, Reider L, Leff B, Frick KD, Boyd CM, Wolff JL, et al. The effect of guided care teams on the use of health services: results from a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2011;171(5):460–466. PubMedCrossRef

35.

de Meijer CA, Majer IM, Koopmanschap MA, van Baal PH. Forecasting lifetime and aggregate long-term care spending: accounting for changing disability patterns. Med Care 2012;50(8):722–729. PubMedCrossRef

36.

Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract 1998;1(1):2–4. PubMed

37.

Merlis M. Caring for the frail elderly: an international review. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(3):141–149. CrossRef

38.

Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the Chronic Care Model, Part 2. JAMA 2002;288(15):1909–1914. PubMedCrossRef

39.

Spoorenberg SL, Uittenbroek RJ, Middel B, Kremer BP, Reijneveld SA, Wynia K. Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness regarding patient outcomes, service use, costs, and quality of care. BMC Geriatr 2013;13:62-2318-13-62.

40.

Peters L, Boter H, Slaets J, Buskens E. Development and measurement properties of the self assessment version of the INTERMED for the elderly to assess case complexity. J Psychosom Res 2013;74(6):518. PubMedCrossRef

41.

Peters LL, Boter H, Buskens E, Slaets JP. Measurement properties of the Groningen Frailty Indicator in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2012;13:546–551. PubMedCrossRef

42.

Wynia K, Annema C, Nissen H, de Keyser J, Middel B. Design of a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) on the effectiveness of a Dutch patient advocacy case management intervention among severely disabled Multiple Sclerosis patients. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:142. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

43.

World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.

44.

ICF browser. http://class.who-fic.nl/browser.aspx?scheme=ICF-nl.cla (bezocht op 1 februari 2013)

45.

NHG-Standaarden. https://www.nhg.org/nhg-standaarden (bezocht op 1 februari 2013)

46.

Latour CH, Huyse FJ, de Vos R, Stalman WA. A method to provide integrated care for complex medically ill patients: the INTERMED. Nurs Health Sci 2007;9(2):150–157. PubMedCrossRef

47.

Schafer W, Kroneman M, Boerma W, van den Berg M, Westert G, Deville W, et al. The Netherlands: health system review. Health Syst Transit 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1–228. PubMed

48.

van den Brink M, van den Hout WB, Stiggelbout AM, van de Velde CJ, Kievit J. Cost measurement in economic evaluations of health care: whom to ask? Med Care 2004;42(8):740–746. PubMedCrossRef

49.

INTERMED Foundation. The INTERMED Method - INTERMED Complexity Assessment Grid. 2009; IM CAG version 6. http://www.intermedfoundation.org/uploads/10/32/103299ff97ac58bcee216085ec23a708/Description-of-IM-CAG-v6-including-interview-and-score-December-2009.pdf (bezocht op 1 februari 2013)

50.

Steverink N, Slaets JPJ, Schuurmans H, van Lis M. Measuring frailty: development and testing of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI). The Gerontologist 2001;41(1):236.

51.

Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37(1):53–72. PubMedCrossRef

52.

Schuurmans H, Steverink N, Frieswijk N, Buunk BP, Slaets JP, Lindenberg S. How to measure self-management abilities in older people by self-report. The development of the SMAS-30. Qual Life Res 2005;14(10):2215–2228. PubMedCrossRef

53.

Robinson BC. Validation of a Caregiver Strain Index. J Gerontol 1983;38(3):344–348. PubMedCrossRef

54.

Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Schaefer J, Mahoney LD, Reid RJ, Greene SM. Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC). Med Care 2005;43(5):436–444. PubMedCrossRef

55.

Wensing M, van Lieshout J, Jung HP, Hermsen J, Rosemann T. The Patients Assessment Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) questionnaire in The Netherlands: a validation study in rural general practice. BMC Health Serv Res 2008;8:182. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

56.

Battersby M, Ask A, Reece M, Markwick M, Collins J. The Partners in Health scale: The development and psychometric properties of a generic assessment scale for chronic condition self-management. Australian Journal of Primary Health 2003;9(3):41–52.

57.

Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Schmader K, Greenberg SM, Carr DB, Wildman DS. Comparing proxy and patients’ perceptions of patients’ functional status: results from an outpatient geriatric clinic. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40(6):585–588.

58.

van der Zee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, de Haes H. Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med 1996;3(2):104–122. CrossRef

59.

Stolee P, Rockwood K, Fox RA, Streiner DL. The use of goal attainment scaling in a geriatric care setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;40(6):574–578. PubMed

60.

Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res 2002;37(3):791–820. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

61.

Zielhuis GA, Straatman H, van ’t Hof-Grootenboer AE, van Lier HJ, Rach GH, van den Broek P. The choice of a balanced allocation method for a clinical trial in otitis media with effusion. Stat Med 1990;9(3):237–246. PubMedCrossRef

62.

Hollis S, Campbell F. What is meant by intention to treat analysis? Survey of published randomised controlled trials. BMJ 1999;319(7211):670–674. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

63.

Torrance GW. Measurement of health state utilities for economic appraisal. J Health Econ 1986;5(1):1–30. PubMedCrossRef

64.

Rockwood K, Howlett S, Stadnyk K, Carver D, Powell C, Stolee P. Responsiveness of goal attainment scaling in a randomized controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56(8):736–743. PubMedCrossRef

65.

Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25(24):3186–3191. CrossRef

66.

Toseland RW, O’Donnell JC, Engelhardt JB, Richie J, Jue D, Banks SM. Outpatient geriatric evaluation and management: is there an investment effect? Gerontologist 1997;37(3):324–332.

67.

Sutherland D, Hayter M. Structured review: evaluating the effectiveness of nurse case managers in improving health outcomes in three major chronic diseases. J Clin Nurs 2009;18(21):2978–2992. PubMedCrossRef

68.

Nummela O, Sulander T, Helakorpi S, Haapola I, Uutela A, Heinonen H, et al. Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64(12):1418–1425. PubMedCrossRef

69.

Nyberg L, Backman L, Erngrund K, Olofsson U, Nilsson LG. Age differences in episodic memory, semantic memory, and priming: relationships to demographic, intellectual, and biological factors. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1996;51(4):P234-40. PubMedCrossRef

70.

Berkman ND, Sheridan SL, Donahue KE, Halpern DJ, Crotty K. Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2011;155(2):97–107. PubMedCrossRef

71.

Deveugele M, Derese A, van den Brink-Muinen A, Bensing J, de Maeseneer J. Consultation length in general practice: cross sectional study in six European countries. BMJ 2002;325(7362):472. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

72.

Tai-Seale M, McGuire TG, Zhang W. Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res 2007;42(5):1871–1894. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Titel: SamenOud, een model voor geïntegreerde ouderenzorg: studieprotocol van een gerandomiseerde studie naar de effectiviteit betreffende patiëntuitkomsten, kwaliteit van zorg, zorggebruik en kosten
Auteurs:: R. J. Uittenbroek
S. L. W. Spoorenberg
R. Brans
B. Middel
B. P. H. Kremer
S. A. Reijneveld
K. Wynia
Publicatiedatum: 01-04-2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12439-014-0062-8
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Tijdschrift: Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie
Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0167-9228
Elektronisch ISSN: 1875-6832

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Embrace, a model for integrated elderly care

Background

Methods

Discussion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

Tijdschrift voor Gerontologie en Geriatrie

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Borging van de financiering van zorg voor kwetsbare ouderen in het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg: knelpunten en oplossingsrichtingen

Implementatie, effecten en kosten van casemanagement voor mensen met dementie en hun mantelzorgers: beschrijving van de COMPAS studie

De toekomst van de ouderenzorg: Het Nationaal Programma Ouderenzorg vervolgd

Overleg tussen mantelzorgers en formele hulpverleners van thuiswonende ouderen

Pam Kaspers. End-of-life care and preferences for (non) treatment decisions in older people during the last 3 months of life. Review door Anouk Overbeek en Agnes van der Heide

Congresagenda