Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 5/2017

16-08-2016 | Original Article

Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different

Auteurs: Joseph Manzone, Geoff G. Cole, Paul A. Skarratt, Timothy N. Welsh

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 5/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Although the inhibition of return (IOR) effect is primarily studied when people act individually, IOR is also observed in social environments where a person observes a partner’s response before executing their own response (social or sIOR). Specifically, an observer takes longer to initiate a response to a target at a location that another individual has just responded to than to another location. The present study was conducted to determine if sIOR emerges when two individuals execute different actions—one participant executed keypress responses and the other completed aiming movements to the same set of stimuli. The two conditions in the present experiment were designed to separate the effects of observing a co-actor’s target information from observing their subsequent response. In the Full Vision condition, observers saw both the target stimuli and the response of the partner. In the Partial Vision condition, observers witnessed the response of the partner, but did not see the target stimulus or any other potentially attention capturing event at the target location. It was found that, although sIOR emerged in the Full Vision condition, sIOR did not emerge in the Partial Vision condition. These and other previous findings on the impact of action goal on sIOR are discussed with reference to the potential contributions of attention and action co-representation mechanisms to the sIOR effect.
Voetnoten
1
In the present paper, a paired-alternating method was used in which participants execute two responses and then watch their partner execute two responses (i.e., AABBAABB…). As a consequence, individual trials (in which the person follows their own response) and joint trials (in which the person follows the action of their partner) are intermixed into the same blocks. In other studies, a straight-alternating approach has been used where participants alternate on each trial (i.e., ABABAB…). The latter straight-alternating approach may be preferred in some circumstances because it indexes the more interesting sIOR in isolation from the iIOR generated by one’s own actions. The present work aimed to assess both sIOR and iIOR and, as such, the decision was made to employ the paired-alternating approach.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427–432.CrossRefPubMed Abrams, R. A., & Christ, S. E. (2003). Motion onset captures attention. Psychological Science, 14(5), 427–432.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ariga, A., & Watanabe, K. (2009). What is special about the index finger?: The index finger advantage in manipulating reflexive attentional shift. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(4), 258–265.CrossRef Ariga, A., & Watanabe, K. (2009). What is special about the index finger?: The index finger advantage in manipulating reflexive attentional shift. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(4), 258–265.CrossRef
go back to reference Atamca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 371–385.CrossRef Atamca, S., Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2011). The joint flanker effect: Sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 371–385.CrossRef
go back to reference Atkinson, M. A., Simpson, A., Skarratt, P. A., & Cole, G. G. (2014). Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation? Acta Psychologica, 150, 85–93.CrossRefPubMed Atkinson, M. A., Simpson, A., Skarratt, P. A., & Cole, G. G. (2014). Is social inhibition of return due to action co-representation? Acta Psychologica, 150, 85–93.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, G. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 153–164.CrossRefPubMed Bekkering, H., Wohlschläger, A., & Gattis, G. (2000). Imitation of gestures in children is goal-directed. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 153–164.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Giving a helping hand: Effects of joint attention on mental rotation of body parts. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 531–545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Böckler, A., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2011). Giving a helping hand: Effects of joint attention on mental rotation of body parts. Experimental Brain Research, 211(3–4), 531–545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1), 3–22.CrossRefPubMed Brass, M., Bekkering, H., & Prinz, W. (2001). Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychologica, 106(1), 3–22.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen through18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315–330.CrossRef Carpenter, M., Akhtar, N., & Tomasello, M. (1998). Fourteen through18-month-old infants differentially imitate intentional and accidental actions. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 315–330.CrossRef
go back to reference Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1485), 1585–1599.CrossRef Cisek, P. (2007). Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362(1485), 1585–1599.CrossRef
go back to reference Cole, G. G., Skarratt, P. A., & Billing, R.-C. (2012). Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return? Psychological Research, 76(6), 736–746.CrossRefPubMed Cole, G. G., Skarratt, P. A., & Billing, R.-C. (2012). Do action goals mediate social inhibition of return? Psychological Research, 76(6), 736–746.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769–771.CrossRefPubMed Flanagan, J. R., & Johansson, R. S. (2003). Action plans used in action observation. Nature, 424(6950), 769–771.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308(5722), 662–667.CrossRefPubMed Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science, 308(5722), 662–667.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495.CrossRef Friesen, C. K., & Kingstone, A. (1998). The eyes have it! Reflexive orienting is triggered by nonpredictive gaze. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(3), 490–495.CrossRef
go back to reference Frischen, A., Loach, D., & Tipper, S. P. (2009). Seeing the world through another person’s eyes: Simulating selective attention via action observation. Cognition, 111(2), 212–218.CrossRefPubMed Frischen, A., Loach, D., & Tipper, S. P. (2009). Seeing the world through another person’s eyes: Simulating selective attention via action observation. Cognition, 111(2), 212–218.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. Neuroimage, 36, T22–T32.CrossRefPubMed Graf, M., Reitzner, B., Corves, C., Casile, A., Giese, M., & Prinz, W. (2007). Predicting point-light actions in real-time. Neuroimage, 36, T22–T32.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kim, D., & Hommel, B. (2015). An event-based account of conformity. Psychological Science, 26, 484–489.CrossRefPubMed Kim, D., & Hommel, B. (2015). An event-based account of conformity. Psychological Science, 26, 484–489.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 138–147.CrossRef Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 138–147.CrossRef
go back to reference Klein, R. M., & Hilchey, M. D. (2011). Oculomotor inhibition of return. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 471–492). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Klein, R. M., & Hilchey, M. D. (2011). Oculomotor inhibition of return. In S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), Oxford handbook on eye movements (pp. 471–492). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return as a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346–352.CrossRef Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return as a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346–352.CrossRef
go back to reference Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2009). Movements, actions and tool-use actions: An ideomotor approach to imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 364(1528), 2349–2358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Massen, C., & Prinz, W. (2009). Movements, actions and tool-use actions: An ideomotor approach to imitation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 364(1528), 2349–2358.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Human Perception and Performance, 11(6), 777–787.CrossRef Maylor, E. A., & Hockey, R. (1985). Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. Journal of Experimental Human Perception and Performance, 11(6), 777–787.CrossRef
go back to reference Neyedli, H., & Welsh, T. N. (2012). The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: Insight from movement trajectory deviations. Acta Psychologica, 139, 159–165.CrossRefPubMed Neyedli, H., & Welsh, T. N. (2012). The processes of facilitation and inhibition in a cue-target paradigm: Insight from movement trajectory deviations. Acta Psychologica, 139, 159–165.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ondobaka, S., de Lange, F. P., Newman-Norlund, R. D., Wiemers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2012). Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction. Psychological Science, 23(1), 30–35.CrossRefPubMed Ondobaka, S., de Lange, F. P., Newman-Norlund, R. D., Wiemers, M., & Bekkering, H. (2012). Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction. Psychological Science, 23(1), 30–35.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ondobaka, S., Newman-Norlund, R. D., de Lange, F. P., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Action recognition depends on observer’s level of action control and social personality traits. PLoS One, 8(11), e81392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ondobaka, S., Newman-Norlund, R. D., de Lange, F. P., & Bekkering, H. (2013). Action recognition depends on observer’s level of action control and social personality traits. PLoS One, 8(11), e81392.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2011). Can you see me in the snow? Action simulation aids the detection of visually degraded human motion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1463–1472.CrossRef Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2011). Can you see me in the snow? Action simulation aids the detection of visually degraded human motion. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64(8), 1463–1472.CrossRef
go back to reference Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Before, during and after you disappear: Aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions. Psychological Research, 76(4), 421–433.CrossRefPubMed Parkinson, J., Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2012). Before, during and after you disappear: Aspects of timing and dynamic updating of the real-time action simulation of human motions. Psychological Research, 76(4), 421–433.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
go back to reference Pratt, J., & Neggers, B. (2008). Inhibition of return in single and dual tasks: Examining saccadic, keypress, and pointing responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(2), 257–265.CrossRefPubMed Pratt, J., & Neggers, B. (2008). Inhibition of return in single and dual tasks: Examining saccadic, keypress, and pointing responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 70(2), 257–265.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Prinz, W. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 141–156). Cambridge: MIT Press. Prinz, W. (2005). An ideomotor approach to imitation. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 1, pp. 141–156). Cambridge: MIT Press.
go back to reference Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Response selection during a joint action task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(4), 329–332.CrossRefPubMed Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Response selection during a joint action task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(4), 329–332.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews in Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef
go back to reference Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 231–265). Cambridge: MIT. Rizzolatti, G., Riggio, L., & Sheliga, B. M. (1994). Space and selective attention. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 231–265). Cambridge: MIT.
go back to reference Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367.CrossRefPubMed Sebanz, N., & Knoblich, G. (2009). Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(2), 353–367.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.CrossRefPubMed Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2003). Representing others' actions: just like one's own? Cognition, 88, B11–B21.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 48–54.CrossRefPubMed Skarratt, P. A., Cole, G. G., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 134(1), 48–54.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134(1), 42–48.CrossRefPubMed Spence, C., Lloyd, D., McGlone, F., Nicholls, M. E. R., & Driver, J. (2000). Inhibition of return is supramodal: A demonstration between all possible pairings of vision, touch, and audition. Experimental Brain Research, 134(1), 42–48.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2141–2158.CrossRefPubMed Springer, A., & Prinz, W. (2010). Action semantics modulate action prediction. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(11), 2141–2158.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1639–1656.PubMed Taylor, T. L., & Klein, R. M. (2000). Visual and motor effects in inhibition of return. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26(5), 1639–1656.PubMed
go back to reference Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centred attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 891–905.PubMed Tipper, S. P., Lortie, C., & Baylis, G. C. (1992). Selective reaching: Evidence for action-centred attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 891–905.PubMed
go back to reference Tremblay, L., Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2005). Between-trial inhibition and facilitation in goal-directed aiming: Manual and spatial asymmetries. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 79–88.CrossRefPubMed Tremblay, L., Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2005). Between-trial inhibition and facilitation in goal-directed aiming: Manual and spatial asymmetries. Experimental Brain Research, 160, 79–88.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31(1), 155–165.CrossRefPubMed Umilta, M. A., Kohler, E., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2001). I know what you are doing: A neurophysiological study. Neuron, 31(1), 155–165.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8), 998–1003.CrossRefPubMed Vesper, C., Butterfill, S., Knoblich, G., & Sebanz, N. (2010). A minimal architecture for joint action. Neural Networks, 23(8), 998–1003.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Villiger, M., Chandrasekharan, S., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence. Experimental Brain Research, 209(1), 85–93.CrossRefPubMed Villiger, M., Chandrasekharan, S., & Welsh, T. N. (2011). Activity of human motor system during action observation is modulated by object presence. Experimental Brain Research, 209(1), 85–93.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385(2), 99–104.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D., Anson, J. G., Dhillon, V., Weeks, D. J., Lyons, J. L., & Chua, R. (2005). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Inhibition of return across different nervous systems. Neuroscience Letters, 385(2), 99–104.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., Anson, J. G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J. E., & Elliott, D. (2007). Within- and between-nervous system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 950–956.CrossRef Welsh, T. N., Lyons, J., Weeks, D. J., Anson, J. G., Chua, R., Mendoza, J. E., & Elliott, D. (2007). Within- and between-nervous system inhibition of return: Observation is as good as performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 950–956.CrossRef
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Manzone, J., & McDougall, L. M. (2014). Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 153, 153–159.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Manzone, J., & McDougall, L. M. (2014). Knowledge of response location alone is not sufficient to generate social inhibition of return. Acta Psychologica, 153, 153–159.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., McDougall, L. M., & Weeks, D. J. (2009a). The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Brain and Cognition, 71(2), 64–71.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., McDougall, L. M., & Weeks, D. J. (2009a). The performance and observation of action shape future behaviour. Brain and Cognition, 71(2), 64–71.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2006). Inhibition of return in cue-target and target–target tasks. Experimental Brian Research, 174(1), 167–175.CrossRef Welsh, T. N., & Pratt, J. (2006). Inhibition of return in cue-target and target–target tasks. Experimental Brian Research, 174(1), 167–175.CrossRef
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Ray, M., Weeks, D. J., Dewey, D., & Elliott, D. (2009b). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141–148.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Ray, M., Weeks, D. J., Dewey, D., & Elliott, D. (2009b). Does Joe influence Fred’s action? Not if Fred has autism spectrum disorder. Brain Research, 1248, 141–148.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., & Weeks, D. J. (2010). Visual selective attention and action. In D. Elliott & M. A. Khan (Eds.), Vision and Goal-Directed Movement: Neurobehavioral Perspectives (pp. 39–58). Champaign: Human Kinetics. Welsh, T. N., & Weeks, D. J. (2010). Visual selective attention and action. In D. Elliott & M. A. Khan (Eds.), Vision and Goal-Directed Movement: Neurobehavioral Perspectives (pp. 39–58). Champaign: Human Kinetics.
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Neyedli, H. F., & Tremblay, L. (2013a). Refining the time course of facilitation and inhibition in attention and action. Neuroscience Letters, 554, 6–10.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Neyedli, H. F., & Tremblay, L. (2013a). Refining the time course of facilitation and inhibition in attention and action. Neuroscience Letters, 554, 6–10.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Welsh, T. N., Wong, L., & Chandresekharan, S. (2013b). Factors that affect action possibility judgments: The assumed abilities of other people. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 235–244.CrossRefPubMed Welsh, T. N., Wong, L., & Chandresekharan, S. (2013b). Factors that affect action possibility judgments: The assumed abilities of other people. Acta Psychologica, 143(2), 235–244.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Response-specific effects in a joint action task: social inhibition of return effects do not emerge when observed and executed actions are different
Auteurs
Joseph Manzone
Geoff G. Cole
Paul A. Skarratt
Timothy N. Welsh
Publicatiedatum
16-08-2016
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 5/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0794-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2017

Psychological Research 5/2017 Naar de uitgave