Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 6/2023

22-10-2022 | Review

Quality of the adaptation procedures and psychometric properties of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5): a systematic review

Auteurs: Saw Nay Min, Duangporn Duangthip, Sherry Shiqian Gao, Palinee Detsomboonrat

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2023

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations and psychometric properties of the Scale of Oral Health Outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5).

Methods

A systematic search was performed in three databases, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Dentistry and Oral Science Source (EBSCO). Studies relating to the cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of SOHO-5 were included. The quality of cross-cultural adaptation was assessed in five aspects including translation, synthesis, back-translation, expert committee review, and pretesting. The Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) checklist was used to assess the psychometric properties in seven domains including responsiveness, internal consistency, reliability, measurement error, and structural, construct, and cross-cultural validity.

Results

The search identified 162 papers for screening; from these, 107 articles and 9 systematic reviews were excluded. 21 full papers were retrieved and 6 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included. Out of six, two reported all five aspects of cross-cultural adaptation procedures. Regarding the psychometric properties, none of the studies evaluated all aspects of psychometric properties. Almost all of the studies reported internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.71 to 0.90), test–retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient 0.46–0.98), and construct validity. None reported the cross-cultural validity and responsiveness of the measures.

Conclusion

While these studies provided satisfactory results regarding the validity and reliability of SOHO-5, the majority of the included studies did not report all domains of the cross-cultural adaptations and psychometric properties. Overall, the quality of the cross-cultural adaptations and psychometric properties of the included studies is doubtful. Future research should follow the guidelines to assess all aspects of psychometric properties and adaptation procedures in cross-cultural settings.
vorige artikel Are OMERACT recommendations followed in clinical trials on fibromyalgia? A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes and their measures
volgende artikel Correction: Quality of the adaptation procedures and psychometric properties of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5‑year‑old children (SOHO‑5): a systematic review
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Chen, K. J., Gao, S. S., Duangthip, D., Lo, E. C., & Chu, C. H. (2019). Prevalence of early childhood caries among 5-year-old children: A systematic review. Journal of Investigative and Clinical Dentistry, 10(1), e12376.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Bernabe, E., Marcenes, W., Hernandez, C., Bailey, J., Abreu, L., Alipour, V., Amini, S., Arabloo, J., & Arefi, Z. (2020). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease 2017 study. Journal of Dental Research, 99(4), 362–373.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Chen, J., Duangthip, D., Gao, S., Huang, F., Anthonappa, R., Oliveira, B., Turton, B., Durward, C., El Tantawi, M., & Attia, D. (2021). Oral health policies to tackle the burden of early childhood caries: A review of 14 countries/regions. Front. Oral. Health, 2, 670154.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Keles, S., Abacigil, F., & Adana, F. (2018). Oral health status and oral health related quality of life in adolescent workers. Clujul Medical, 91(4), 462.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Genderson, M., Sischo, L., Markowitz, K., Fine, D., & Broder, H. (2013). An overview of children’s oral health-related quality of life assessment: From scale development to measuring outcomes. Caries Research, 47(Suppl. 1), 13–21.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Jokovic, A., Locker, D., Stephens, M., Kenny, D., Tompson, B., & Guyatt, G. (2002). Validity and reliability of a questionnaire for measuring child oral-health-related quality of life. Journal of Dental Research, 81(7), 459–463.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Can parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results of a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 10(4), 347–357.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Connolly, M. A., & Johnson, J. A. (1999). Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients. PharmacoEconomics, 16(6), 605–625.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Barbosa, T. D. S., & Gavião, M. B. D. (2008). Oral health-related quality of life in children: Part I: How well do children know themselves? A systematic review. International Journal of Dental Hygiene, 6(2), 93–99.CrossRefPubMed
10.
11.
Helmerhorst, H. H. J., Brage, S., Warren, J., Besson, H., & Ekelund, U. (2012). A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9(1), 1–55.CrossRef
12.
Costa, L. D. C. M., Maher, C. G., McAuley, J. H., & Costa, L. O. P. (2009). Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of McGill pain questionnaire reveals a paucity of clinimetric testing. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(9), 934–943.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Oliveira, I. S., da Cunha Menezes Costa, L., Fagundes, F. R. C., & Cabral, C. M. N. (2015). Evaluation of cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of breast cancer-specific quality-of-life questionnaires: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1179–1195.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Zaror, C., Pardo, Y., Espinoza-Espinoza, G., Pont, À., Muñoz-Millán, P., Martínez-Zapata, M. J., Vilagut, G., Forero, C. G., Garin, O., & Alonso, J. (2019). Assessing oral health-related quality of life in children and adolescents: A systematic review and standardized comparison of available instruments. Clinical Oral Investigations, 23(1), 65–79.CrossRefPubMed
15.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & Group, P. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
Frandsen, T. F., Nielsen, M. F. B., Lindhardt, C. L., & Eriksen, M. B. (2020). Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 127, 69–75.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Praveen, S., Parmar, J., Chandio, N., & Arora, A. (2021). A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of oral health literacy tools. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10422.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
Prinsen, C. A., Mokkink, L. B., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2018). COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Quality of Life Research, 27(5), 1147–1157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
23.
Mokkink, L. B., Prinsen, C., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H., Terwee, C. B., & Mokkink, L. (2018). COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). User Manual, 78(1).
24.
Abma, I. L., Rovers, M., & van der Wees, P. J. (2016). Appraising convergent validity of patient-reported outcome measures in systematic reviews: Constructing hypotheses and interpreting outcomes. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 226.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
Mishu, M. P., Watt, R. G., Heilmann, A., & Tsakos, G. (2021). Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Bengali version of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 19(1), 46.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
Abanto, J., Tsakos, G., Paiva, S. M., Goursand, D., Raggio, D. P., & Bönecker, M. (2013). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
Gao, S. S., Chen, K. J., Duangthip, D., Chu, C. H., & Lo, E. C. M. (2020). Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children. International Dental Journal, 70(3), 201–207.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
Rachmawati, Y. L., Pratiwi, A. N., & Maharani, D. A. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of the Indonesia version of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 7(Suppl 2), S75-s81.
29.
Asgari, I., & Kazemi, E. (2017). Cross-cultural adaptation of persian version of scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran), 14(1), 48–54.
30.
Abreu-Placeres, N., Garrido, L. E., & Féliz-Matos, L. E. (2017). Cross-cultural validation of the scale of oral health-related outcomes for 5-year-old-children with a low-income sample from the Dominican republic. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 7(3), 84–89.
31.
Lee, E.-H., Kang, E. H., & Kang, H.-J. (2020). Evaluation of studies on the measurement properties of self-reported instruments. Asian Nursing Research, 14(5), 267–276.CrossRefPubMed
32.
Huang, W. Y., & Wong, S. H. (2014). Cross-cultural validation. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 1369–1371). Springer, Netherlands.CrossRef
33.
Abanto, J., Tsakos, G., Ardenghi, T. M., Paiva, S. M., Raggio, D. P., Sheiham, A., & Bönecker, M. (2013). Responsiveness to change for the Brazilian scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 11, 137.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
Epstein, J., Santo, R. M., & Guillemin, F. (2015). A review of guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of questionnaires could not bring out a consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(4), 435–441.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Gómez-Valero, S., García-Pérez, F., Flórez-García, M. T., & Miangolarra-Page, J. C. (2017). Assessment of cross-cultural adaptations of patient-reported shoulder outcome measures in Spanish: A systematic review. Shoulder & Elbow, 9(4), 233–246.CrossRef
36.
Reichenheim, M., & Bastos, J. L. (2021). What, what for and how? Developing measurement instruments in epidemiology. Revista de Saúde Pública, 55, 40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Quality of the adaptation procedures and psychometric properties of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5): a systematic review
Auteurs
Saw Nay Min
Duangporn Duangthip
Sherry Shiqian Gao
Palinee Detsomboonrat
Publicatiedatum
22-10-2022
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03280-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2023

Quality of Life Research 6/2023 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Development and psychometric validation of a patient-reported outcome measure of recurrent urinary tract infection impact: the Recurrent UTI Impact Questionnaire

OriginalPaper

The relative contribution of co-morbidities to health-related quality of life of people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using the Assessment of Quality of Life-8-Dimension multi-attribute utility instrument

OriginalPaper

What is important to adults after lower limb reconstruction surgery: a conceptual framework

OriginalPaper

Content validation of the SF-36v2® Health Survey Acute for use in hypoparathyroidism

OriginalPaper

Cross-sectional study examining psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14-SL)

OriginalPaper

Psychological interventions improve quality of life despite persistent pain in endometriosis: results of a 3-armed randomized controlled trial