Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

12-12-2022

Cross-sectional study examining psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14-SL)

Auteurs: Špela Miroševič, Polona Selič–Zupančič, Judith Prins, Zalika Klemenc–Ketiš

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2023

Abstract

Purpose

Resilience has become an important concept in health research, addressing mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to translate, adapt, and evaluate psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14), using a sample of general population and cancer survivors.

Methods

The original version of the RS-14 was first back-translated and pilot tested. The factor structure was assessed with an exploratory analysis and confirmed with a confirmatory analysis. To assess reliability, internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) and test–retest (ICC, t student test) were determined. Measurement validity was assessed with demographic (age and gender) and psychological characteristics (symptoms of anxiety and depression and health-related quality of life).

Results

An exploratory factor analysis revealed one-factor solution in both samples and the fit indexes showed an acceptable model fit. Internal consistency showed excellent values (0.91–0.96), and test–retest reliability was found to be acceptable (ICC = 0.89). Significant correlations were found between RS-14 and anxiety and depression HADS subscales in Sample 1 (r = − 0.62, − 0.72 for anxiety and depression) and Sample 2 (r = − 0.43, r = − 0.51 for anxiety and depression) and the majority of EQ-5D subscales (usual activities, pain, anxiety/depression).

Conclusion

The study showed that the Slovenian version of the RS-14 test scores is valid and stable.

Trial registration number:

0120–25/2019/6

vorige artikel Quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

volgende artikel Reliability and validity of the simplified Chinese version of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Immune Checkpoint Modulator

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and psychopathology., 2(4), 425–444.CrossRef

Pietrzak, R. H., Tracy, M., Galea, S., Kilpatrick, D. G., Ruggiero, K. J., Hamblen, J. L., Southwick, S. M., & Norris, F. H. (2012). Resilience in the face of disaster: Prevalence and longitudinal course of mental disorders following hurricane Ike. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e38964. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038964.PubMedPMID:22761716;PMCID:PMC3383685CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ssenyonga, J., Owens, V., & Olema, D. K. (2013). Posttraumatic growth, resilience, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among refugees. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences., 82, 144–148.CrossRef

Ahn, R. L. (1991). Development and validation of the Washington resilience scale. University of Washington.

Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9, 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The connor-davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113CrossRefPubMed

Wagnild, G. M., & Young, H. M. (1993). Development and psychometric evaluation of the resilience scale. J Nursing Measurement, 1(2), 165–178.

Wagnild, G. M. (2009). The resilience scale user’s guide for the US English version of the resilience scale and the 14-item resilience scale (RS-14). Worden, MT: The Resilience Center.

Smith-Osborne, A., & Whitehill, B. K. (2013). Assessing resilience: A review of measures across the life course. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10(2), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2011.597305CrossRefPubMed

10.

Portzky, M., Wagnild, G., De Bacquer, D., & Audenaert, K. (2010). Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch Resilience Scale RS-nl on 3265 healthy participants: A confirmation of the association between age and resilience found with the Swedish version. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 24(1), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00841.xCrossRefPubMed

11.

Madewell, A. N., Ponce-Garcia, E., & Martin, S. E. (2016). Data replicating the factor structure and reliability of commonly used measures of resilience: The Connor-Davidson resilience scale, resilience scale, and scale of protective factors. Data in Brief, 8, 1387–1390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.08.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Wagnild, G. M. (2009). The Resilience Scale User’s Guide for the US English Version of the Resilience Scale and the 14-Item Reselience Scale (RS-14). The Resilience Center.

13.

Nishi, D., Uehara, R., Kondo, M., & Matsuoka, Y. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Resilience Scale and its short version. BMC Research Notes, 3, 310. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-3-310CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Abiola, T., & Udofia, O. (2011). Psychometric assessment of the Wagnild and Young’s Resilience Scale in Kano. Nigeria. BMC Res Notes, 4, 509. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-4-509CrossRefPubMed

15.

Callegari, C., Bertu, L., Lucano, M., Ielmini, M., Braggio, E., & Vender, S. (2016). Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 9, 277–284. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S115657CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Pinheiro, M. R., & Matos, A. P. (2013). Exploring the construct validity of the two versions of the Resilience Scale in an Portuguese adolescent sample. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, 2(10), 178–189.

17.

Oliveira, A., Matos, A. P., do Rosário Pinheiro, M., & Oliveira, S. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the resilience scale short form in a portuguese adolescent sample. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165, 260–266.CrossRef

18.

Pritzker, S., & Minter, A. (2014). Measuring adolescent resilience: An examination of the cross-ethnic validity of the RS-14. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 328–333.CrossRef

19.

Losoi, H., Turunen, S., Wäljas, M., Helminen, M., Öhman, J., Julkunen, J., & Rosti-Otajärvi, E. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Resilience Scale and its short version. Psychology, Community & Health, 2(1), 1–10.CrossRef

20.

Tian, J., & Hong, J. S. (2013). Validation of the Chinese version of the resilience scale and its cutoff score for detecting low resilience in Chinese cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 21(5), 1497–1502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-012-1699-xCrossRefPubMed

21.

Damasio, B. F., Borsa, J. C., & da Silva, J. P. (2011). 14-item resilience scale (RS-14): Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 19(3), 131–145.CrossRefPubMed

22.

Kwon, H. J., & Kwon, S. J. (2014). Korean version of the 14-item resilience scale (RS-14) for university students: A validity and reliability study. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 23(4), 226–232.CrossRef

23.

Bhamani, M. A., Khan, M. M., Karim, M. S., & Mir, M. U. (2015). Depression and its association with functional status and physical activity in the elderly in Karachi Pakistan. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 14, 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2014.12.004CrossRefPubMed

24.

Aiena, B. J., Baczwaski, B. J., Schulenberg, S. E., & Buchanan, E. M. (2015). Measuring resilience with the RS-14: A tale of two samples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97(3), 291–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2014.951445CrossRefPubMed

25.

Bhamani, S. S., Pasha, O., Karmaliani, R., Asad, N., & Azam, I. (2015). Validation of the urdu version of wagnild and young’s long and short resilience scales among 20–40 year-old married women living in urban squatter settlements of Karachi Pakistan. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 23(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.23.3.425CrossRefPubMed

26.

Zadnik, V., Primic Zakelj, M., Lokar, K., Jarm, K., Ivanus, U., & Zagar, T. (2017). Cancer burden in slovenia with the time trends analysis. Radiology and Oncology, 51(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1515/raon-2017-0008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

27.

Bowen, D. J., Morasca, A. A., & Meischke, H. (2003). Measures and correlates of resilience. Women and Health, 38(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v38n02_05CrossRefPubMed

28.

Rowland, J. H., & Baker, F. (2005). Introduction: Resilience of cancer survivors across the lifespan. Cancer, 104(S11), 2543–2548.CrossRefPubMed

29.

Stewart, D. E., Wong, F., Duff, S., Melancon, C. H., & Cheung, A. M. (2011). “What doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”: An ovarian cancer survivor survey. Gynecologic oncology., 83(3), 537–542.CrossRef

30.

Manne, S. L., Myers-Virtue, S., Kashy, D., Ozga, M., Kissane, D., Heckman, C., Rubin, S. C., & Rosenblum, N. (2015). Resilience, positive coping, and quality of life among women newly diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Cancer Nursing, 38(5), 375–382. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000215CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

31.

Gotay, C. C., Ransom, S., & Pagano, I. S. (2007). Quality of life in survivors of multiple primary cancers compared with cancer survivor controls. Cancer, 110(9), 2101–2109. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23005CrossRefPubMed

32.

Kamen, C., Jabson, J. M., Mustian, K. M., & Boehmer, U. (2017). Minority stress, psychosocial resources, and psychological distress among sexual minority breast cancer survivors. Health Psychology, 36(6), 529–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000465CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (second edition). Lawrence Erlbaum.

34.

Paiva, C. E., Barroso, E. M., Carneseca, E. C., de Padua, S. C., Dos Santos, F. T., Mendoza Lopez, R. V., & Ribeiro Paiva, S. B. (2014). A critical analysis of test-retest reliability in instrument validation studies of cancer patients under palliative care: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-14-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Annunziata, M. A., Muzzatti, B., Bidoli, E., Flaiban, C., Bomben, F., Piccinin, M., Gipponi, K. M., Mariutti, G., Busato, S., & Mella, S. (2020). Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) accuracy in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(8), 3921–3926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05244-8CrossRefPubMed

36.

Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scand., 67(6), 361–370.CrossRef

37.

Miklavcic, I. V., Snoj, Z., Mlakar, J., & Pregelj, P. (2008). Validation of the Slovenian version of hospital anxiety and depression scale in female cancer patients. Psychiatria Danubina., 20(2), 148–152.PubMed

38.

EuroQol, G. (1990). EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16(3), 199–208.CrossRef

39.

Turk, E., Rupel, V. P., Tapajner, A., & Isola, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the audit on diabetes-dependent quality of life (ADDQoL) and EQ-5D in elderly Slovenian diabetes mellitus type 2 patients. Health. https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2014.68091CrossRef

40.

Bell, M. L., Fairclough, D. L., Fiero, M. H., & Butow, P. N. (2016). Handling missing items in the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS): A simulation study. BMC Research Notes, 9(1), 479. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2284-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Stewart, R. C., Umar, E., Tomenson, B., & Creed, F. (2014). Validation of the multi-dimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) and the relationship between social support, intimate partner violence and antenatal depression in Malawi. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-180CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315CrossRefPubMed

43.

Hashim, C. G., Taib, N. A., Yoon, H. J., Larkin, D., Yip, D., & Lopez, V. (2021). Psychometric assessment of the malay version of the 14-item resilience scale (RS-14) in women with breast cancer. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 29(1), E18–E38. https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-D-19-00068CrossRefPubMed

44.

Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge.

45.

Mirosevic, S., Klemenc-Ketis, Z., & Selic, P. (2019). The 14-item resilience scale as a potential screening tool for depression/anxiety and quality of life assessment: a systematic review of current research. Family Practice, 36(3), 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy081CrossRefPubMed

46.

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272.CrossRef

47.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.CrossRef

48.

McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2021). Dynamic fit index cutoffs for confirmatory factor analysis models. Psychological Methods. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000425CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

49.

Peugh, J., & Feldon, D. F. (2020). “How Well Does Your Structural Equation Model Fit Your Data?”: Is Marcoulides and Yuan’s Equivalence Test the Answer? CBE—Life Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-01-0016CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

50.

van de Schoot, R., Kluytmans, A., Tummers, L., Lugtig, P., Hox, J., & Muthen, B. (2013). Facing off with scylla and charybdis: A comparison of scalar, partial, and the novel possibility of approximate measurement invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 770. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00770CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

51.

Cheung, G. W. R. B. R. (2009). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5CrossRef

52.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

53.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., & de Vet, H. C. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed

54.

Dancey, C. P., & Reidy, J. (2007). Statistics without maths for psychology. Pearson Education.

55.

Akoglu, H. (2018). User’s guide to correlation coefficients. Turk J Emerg Med., 18(3), 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjem.2018.08.001CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

56.

Kenny, D. A., Kaniskan, B., & McCoach, D. B. (2015). The performance of RMSEA in models with small degrees of freedom. Sociol Methods Res, 44(3), 486–507.CrossRef

57.

Ntountoulaki, E., Paika, V., Kotsis, K., Papaioannou, D., Andreoulakis, E., Fountoulakis, K. N., Carvalho, A. F., & Hyphantis, T. (2017). The Greek version of the Resilience Scale (RS-14): Psychometric properties in three samples and associations with mental illness, suicidality, and quality of life. Journal of Psychology and Clinical Psychiatry, 7, 1.

58.

Surzykiewicz, J., Konaszewski, K., & Wagnild, G. (2018). Polish version of the resilience scale (RS-14): A validity and reliability study in three samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2762. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02762CrossRefPubMed

59.

Pascoe, L., Aziz Rahman, M., Edvardsson, K., Jokwiro, Y., McDonald, E., Lood, Q., Edvardsson, D., & Li, X. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the English version 14-item resilience scale (RS) in an Australian outpatient population of men with prostate cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing, 35, 73–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.06.001CrossRefPubMed

60.

Liu, Q., & Wang, L. (2021). t-Test and ANOVA for data with ceiling and/or floor effects. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 264–277. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01407-2CrossRefPubMed

61.

Cuoco, S., Carotenuto, I., Cappiello, A., Bisogno, R., Picillo, M., Pellecchia, M. T., Barone, P., & Erro, R. (2021). Reliability and validity of the novel Italian version of the 14-item resilience scale (RS-14) in adults. Neurological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05784-0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

62.

Gao, Y., Yuan, L., Pan, B., & Wang, L. (2019). Resilience and associated factors among Chinese patients diagnosed with oral cancer. BMC Cancer, 19(1), 1–9.CrossRef

63.

Costanzo, E. S., Ryff, C. D., & Singer, B. H. (2009). Psychosocial adjustment among cancer survivors: Findings from a national survey of health and well-being. Health Psychology, 28(2), 147.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

64.

Wu, H., & Leung, S. O. (2017). Can Likert scales be treated as interval scales?—a simulation study. Journal of Social Service Research, 4, 527–532.CrossRef

65.

Winsett, R. P., Stender, S. R., Gower, G., & Burghen, G. A. (2010). Adolescent self-efficacy and resilience in participants attending a diabetes camp. Pediatric Nursing, 36(6), 293–296.PubMed

66.

Thomas, L. J., & Asselin, M. (2018). Promoting resilience among nursing students in clinical education. Nurse Education in Practice, 28, 231–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.10.001CrossRefPubMed

67.

Rutter, M. (2013). Annual research review: Resilience–clinical implications. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(4), 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02615.xCrossRefPubMed

Titel: Cross-sectional study examining psychometric properties of the Slovenian version of the 14-item Resilience Scale (RS-14-SL)
Auteurs: Špela Miroševič
Polona Selič–Zupančič
Judith Prins
Zalika Klemenc–Ketiš
Publicatiedatum: 12-12-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2023
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03316-7

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Trial registration number:

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2023

Content validation of the SF-36v2® Health Survey Acute for use in hypoparathyroidism

Impact of episodic and chronic vestibular disorders on health-related quality of life and functioning—results from the DizzyReg patient registry

Quality of the adaptation procedures and psychometric properties of the scale of oral health outcomes for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5): a systematic review

Quality of life among family caregivers of people with schizophrenia in rural China

Comparative analysis of pediatric anxiety measures in clinical sample: evaluation of the PROMIS pediatric anxiety short forms

Health-related quality of life in seven European countries throughout the course of the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the European COvid Survey (ECOS)