Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Importance ratings on patient-reported outcome ...

volgende artikel The importance of content and face validity in ...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

22-03-2018 | Uitgave 7/2018

PROMIS^®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores

Tijdschrift:: Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 7/2018

Auteurs:: Ron D. Hays, Karen L. Spritzer, Benjamin D. Schalet, David Cella

Extra’s

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Purpose

The PROMIS-29 v2.0 profile assesses pain intensity using a single 0–10 numeric rating item and seven health domains (physical function, fatigue, pain interference, depressive symptoms, anxiety, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and sleep disturbance) using four items per domain. This paper describes the development of physical and mental health summary scores for the PROMIS-29 v2.0.

Method

We conducted factor analyses of PROMIS-29 scales on data collected from two internet panels (n = 3000 and 2000).

Results

Confirmatory factor analyses provided support for a physical health factor defined by physical function, pain (interference and intensity), and ability to participate in social roles and activities, and a mental health factor defined primarily by emotional distress (anxiety and depressive symptoms). Reliabilities for these two summary scores were 0.98 (physical health) and 0.97 (mental health). Correlations of the PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores with chronic conditions and other health-related quality of life measures were consistent with a priori hypotheses.

Conclusions

This study develops and provides preliminary evidence supporting the reliability and validity of PROMIS-29 v2.0 physical and mental health summary scores that can be used in future studies to assess impacts of health care interventions and track changes in health over time. Further evaluation of these and alternative summary measures is recommended.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Meer informatie

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 51 KB)

11136_2018_1842_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Young, S., et al. (2010). Initial item banks and first wave testing of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) network: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hinami, K., Smith, J., Deamant, C., DuBeshler, K., & Trick, W. (2015). When do patient-reported outcome measures inform readmission risk? Journal of Hospital Medicine, 10, 294–300. CrossRefPubMed

DeSalvo, K. B., Bloser, N., Reynolds, K., He, J., & Muntner, P. J. (2006). Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(3), 267–275. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Han, P. K. J., Lee, M., Reeve, B. B., Mariotto, A. B., Wang, Z., Hays, R. D., et al. (2012). Development of a prognostic model for six-month mortality in older adults with declining health. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 43, 527–539. CrossRefPubMed

Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Pilkonis, P. A., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2010). Efficiency of static and computer adaptive short forms compared to full-length measures of depressive symptoms. Quality of Life Research, 19, 125–136. CrossRefPubMed

Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Fries, J. F., & Krishnan, E. (2013). Responsiveness and minimally important difference for the patient-reported outcomes measurement and information system (PROMIS) 20-item physical functioning short-form in a prospective observational study of rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 74(1), 104–107. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hinchcliff, M. E., Beaumont, J. L., Carns, M. A., Podlusky, S., Thavarajah, K., Varga, et al. (2015). Longitudinal evaluation of PROMIS-29 and FACIT-dyspnea short forms in systemic sclerosis. Journal of Rheumatology, 42(1), 64–72. CrossRefPubMed

Katz, P., Pedro, S., & Michaud, K. (2017). Performance of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system 29-item profile in rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, and systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care and Research, 69(8), 1312–1321. CrossRefPubMed

Fisher, F., Gibbons, C., Coste, J., Valderas, J. M., Rose, M., & Leplège, A. (2018). Measurement invariance and general population reference values of the PROMIS profile 29 in the UK, France, and Germany. Quality of Life Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1785-8 PubMedCrossRef

10.

Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Gandek, B., Bruce, B., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2014). The PROMIS physical function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(5), 516–526. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Lai, J.-S., Cella, D., Choi, S., et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10), S20-S27. CrossRefPubMedCentral

12.

Amtmann, D., Cook, K. F., Jensen, M. P., et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173–182. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

13.

Pilkonis, P. A., Choi, S. W., Reise, S. P., Stover, A. M., Riley, W. T., & Cella, D. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS®): Depression, anxiety, and anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263–283. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

14.

Hahn, E. A., DeWalt, D. A., Bode, R. K., et al. (2014). New English and Spanish social health measures will facilitate evaluating health determinants. Health Psychology, 33(5), 490–499. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Buysse, D. J., Yu, L., Moul, D. E., et al. (2010). Development and validation of patient-reported outcome measures for sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairments. Sleep, 33(6), 781–792. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Hays, R. D., Alonso, J., & Coons, S. J. (1998). Possibilities for summarizing health-related quality of life when using a profile instrument. In M. Staquet, R. Hays & P. Fayers (Eds.), Quality of life assessment in clinical trials: Methods and practice (pp. 143–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

17.

Farivar, S. S., Cunningham, W. E., & Hays, R. D. (2007). Correlated physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 and SF-12 health survey, V. 1. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5:54. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

18.

Hays, R. D., Marshall, G. N., Wang, E. Y. I., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1994). Four-year cross-lagged associations between physical and mental health in the medical outcomes study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 441–449. CrossRefPubMed

19.

Hays, R. D., & Stewart, A. L. (1990). The structure of self-reported health in chronic disease patients. Psychological Assessment, 2, 22–30. CrossRef

20.

Carle, A. C., Riley, W., Hays, R. D., et al. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis of the patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) adult domain framework using item response theory scores. Medical Care, 53, 894–900. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Op4g website. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from http://op4g.com/our-panel/.

22.

Butt, Z., Peipert, J., Webster, K., Chen, C., & Cella, D. (2013). General population norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-kidney symptoms index (FKSI). Cancer, 119(2), 429–437. CrossRefPubMed

23.

Feeny, D., Furlong, W., Boyle, M., et al. (1995). Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Pharmacoeconomics, 7, 490–502. CrossRefPubMed

24.

Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J., Revicki, D. A., Spritzer, K., & Cella, D. (2009). Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Quality of Life Research, 18, 873–880. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Revicki, D. A., Kawata, A. K., Harnam, N., Chen, W.-H., Hays, R. D., & Cella, D. (2009). Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample. Quality of Life Research, 18, 783–791. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

26.

Ware, J. E. (2000). SF-36 health survey update. Spine, 25, 3130–3139. CrossRefPubMed

27.

Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002). The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36. Journal of Health Economics, 21(2), 271–292. CrossRefPubMed

28.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334. CrossRef

29.

Rummel, R. J. (1970). Applied factor analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

30.

Hendrickson, A. E., & White, P. (1964). Promax: A quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 17, 65–70. CrossRef

31.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef

32.

Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide, 7th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén

33.

Mosier, C. I. (1943). On the reliability of a weighted composite. Psychometrika, 8(3), 161–168. CrossRef

34.

Hays, R. D., Revicki, D. A., Feeny, D., Fayers, P., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2016). Using linear equating to map PROMIS global health items and the PROMIS-29 V. 2 Profile measure to the health utilities index—mark 3. Pharmacoeconomics, 34, 1015–1022. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

35.

Taft, C., Karlsson, J., & Sullivan, M. (2001). Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Quality of Life Research, 10, 395–404. CrossRefPubMed

36.

Hays, R. D., Schalet, B. D., Spritzer, K. L., & Cella, D. (2017). Two-item PROMIS global physical and mental health scales. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 1, 2. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

37.

Barile, J. P., Reeve, B. B., Smith, A. W., Zack, M. M., Mitchell, S. A., Kobau, R., et al. (2013). Monitoring population health for healthy people 2020: Evaluation of the NIH PROMIS® global health, CDC healthy days, and satisfaction with life instruments. Quality of Life Research, 22(6), 1201–1211. CrossRefPubMed

38.

Simon, G. E., Revicki, D. A., Grothaus, L., et al. (1998). SF-36 summary scores: Are physical and mental health truly distinct? Medical Care, 36, 567–572. CrossRefPubMed

39.

HealthMeasures website. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from http://www.healthmeasures.net.

40.

Craig, B. M., Reeve, B. B., Brown, P. M., Cella, D., Hays, R. D., Lipscomb, J., Pickard, A. S., & Revicki, D. A. (2014). US valuation of health outcomes measured using the PROMIS-29. Value in Health, 17(8), 846–853. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Hanmer, J., Cella, D., Feeny, D., Fischhoff, B., Hays, R. D., Hess, R., et al. (2017). Selection of key health domains from PROMIS® for a generic preference-based scoring system. Quality of Life Research, 26, 3377–3385 CrossRef

42.

Hanmer, J., Feeny, D., Fischoff, B., Hays, R. D., Hess, R., Pilkonis, P., et al. (2015). The PROMIS of QALYs. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 13, 122. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: PROMIS®-29 v2.0 profile physical and mental health summary scores
Auteurs:: Ron D. Hays
Karen L. Spritzer
Benjamin D. Schalet
David Cella
Publicatiedatum: 22-03-2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1842-3
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Tijdschrift: Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Uitgave 7/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Electronic supplementary material

Abstract

Purpose

Method

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2018

The use of latent variable mixture models to identify invariant items in test construction

Ensuring content validity of patient-reported outcomes: a shadow-test approach to their adaptive measurement

Scale development with small samples: a new application of longitudinal item response theory

Preference-based measures to obtain health state utility values for use in economic evaluations with child-based populations: a review and UK-based focus group assessment of patient and parent choices

Application of validity theory and methodology to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): building an argument for validity

Validation of the PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment item banks in Dutch adolescents