Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1854-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
To compare importance ratings of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) items from the viewpoints of childhood cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians for further developing short-forms to use in survivorship care.
101 cancer survivors, 101 their parents, and 36 clinicians were recruited from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital. Participants were asked to select eight items that they deemed useful for clinical decision making from each of the four Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pediatric item banks. These item banks were pain interference (20 items), fatigue (23 items), psychological stress (19 items), and positive affect (37 items).
Compared to survivors, clinicians rated more items across four domains that were statistically different than did parents (23 vs. 13 items). Clinicians rated five items in pain interference domain (ORs 2.33–6.01; p’s < 0.05) and three items in fatigue domain (ORs 2.22–3.80; p’s < .05) as more important but rated three items in psychological stress domain (ORs 0.14–0.42; p’s < .05) and six items in positive affect domain (ORs 0.17–0.35; p’s < .05) as less important than did survivors. In contrast, parents rated seven items in positive affect domain (ORs 0.25–0.47; p’s < .05) as less important than did survivors.
Survivors, parents, and clinicians viewed importance of PRO items for survivorship care differently. These perspectives should be used to assist the development of PROs tools.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 32 KB)11136_2018_1854_MOESM1_ESM.docx
American Cancer Society (2014). Special section: Childhood & adolescent cancers. In American cancer society, cancer facts & figures 2014 (pp. 25–42). Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
Klassen, A. F., Anthony, S. J., Khan, A., Sung, L., & Klaassen, R. (2011). Identifying determinants of quality of life of children with cancer and childhood cancer survivors: A systematic review. Supportive Care Cancer, 19(9), 1275–1287. CrossRef
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(5 Suppl 1), S3–S11.
Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., Rothrock, N., Reeve, B., Yount, S., et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179–1194. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
DeWalt, D. A., Gross, H. E., Gipson, D. S., Selewski, D. T., DeWitt, E. M., Dampier, C. D., et al. (2015). PROMIS((R)) pediatric self-report scales distinguish subgroups of children within and across six common pediatric chronic health conditions. Quality of Life Research, 24(9), 2195–2208. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Menard, J. C., Hinds, P. S., Jacobs, S. S., Cranston, K., Wang, J., DeWalt, D. A., & Gross, H. E. (2014). Feasibility and acceptability of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system measures in children and adolescents in active cancer treatment and survivorship. Cancer Nursing, 37(1), 66–74. CrossRefPubMed
Matza, L. S., Patrick, D. L., Riley, A. W., Alexander, J. J., Rajmil, L., Pleil, A. M., & Bullinger, M. (2013). Pediatric patient-reported outcome instruments for research to support medical product labeling: Report of the ISPOR PRO good research practices for the assessment of children and adolescents task force. Value in Health, 16(4), 461–479. CrossRefPubMed
Spencer, D. (2009). Card sorting: Designing usable categories. Brooklyn, NY: Rosenfeld Media.
DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., et al. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: Built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- Importance ratings on patient-reported outcome items for survivorship care: comparison between pediatric cancer survivors, parents, and clinicians
Conor M. Jones
Justin N. Baker
Rachel M. Keesey
Ruth J. Eliason
Jennifer Q. Lanctot
Jennifer L. Clegg
Belinda N. Mandrell
Kirsten K. Ness
Kevin R. Krull
Christopher B. Forrest
Melissa M. Hudson
Leslie L. Robison
- Springer International Publishing