Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The present study examined the joint development of substance use and externalizing problems in early and middle adolescence. First, it was tested whether the relevant groups found in previous studies i.e., those with an early onset, a late onset, and no onset or low levels of risk behavior could be identified, while using a developmental model of a single, underlying construct of risk behavior. Second, departing from Moffitt’s taxonomy of antisocial behavior, it was tested if early, but not late, onset risk behavior is predicted by a problematic risk profile in childhood. Data were used from TRAILS, a population based cohort study, starting at age 11 with two follow-ups at mean ages of 13.6 and 16.3 years. Latent transition analyses demonstrated that, both in early and middle adolescence, a single underlying construct of risk behavior, consisting of two classes (labeled as low and high risk behavior), adequately represented the data. Respondents could be clearly classified into four possible transition patterns from early to middle adolescence, with a transition from high to low being almost non-existent (2.5 %), low to low (39.4 %) and low to high (41.8 %) being the most prevalent, and high to high (16.2 %) substantial. As hypothesized, only the high-high group was characterized by a clear adverse predictor profile in late childhood, while the low-high group was not. This study demonstrates that the development of substance use is correlated with externalizing problems and underscores the theory that etiologies of early and later onset risk behavior are different.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the youth self-report and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont Department of Psychiatry.
Clark, S. L. & Muthén, B. (2010). Relating latent class analysis results to variables not included in the analysis. Working paper. From: www.statmodel.com.
Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2009). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken: Wiley.
Connel, A., Bullock, B. M., Dishion, T. J., Shaw, D., Wilson, M., & Gardner, F. (2008). Family intervention effects on co-occurring early childhood behavioral and emotional problems: a latent transition analysis approach. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1211–1225. CrossRef
Creemers, H. E., Korhonen, T., Kaprio, J., Vollebergh, W. A. M., Ormel, J., Verhulst, F. C., et al. (2009). The role of temperament in the relationship between early onset of tobacco and cannabis use. The TRAILS study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 104, 113–118. CrossRef
Donovan, J. E., Jessor, R., & Costa, F. M. (1998). Syndrome of problem behavior in adolescence: a replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 762–765. CrossRef
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201–239. CrossRef
Goldweber, A., Bradshaw, C. P., Goodman, K., Monohan, K., & Cooley-Strickland, M. (2011). Examining factors associated with (In)Stability in social information processing among urban school children: a latent transition analytic approach. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 715–729. PubMedCrossRef
Hibell, B., Guttormsson, U., Ahlström, S., Balakireva, O., Bjarnason, T., Kokkevi, A., et al. (2009). The 2007 ESPAD report: Substance use among students in 35 European countries. Stockholm: CAN.
Hiller-Sturmhöfel, S., & Swartzwelder, S. (2004). Alcohol’s effects on the adolescent brain: what can be learned from animal models. Alcohol Research & Health, 28, 213–221.
Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behaviour and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic.
Lanza, S. T., Patrick, M. E., & Maggs, J. L. (2009). Latent transition analysis: benefits of a latent variable approach to modeling transitions in substance use. Journal of Drug Issues, 40, 93–120. CrossRef
Markus, M. Th., Lindhout, I. E., Boer, F., Hoogendijk, T. H. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (2003). Factors of perceived parental rearing styles: the EMBU-C examined in a sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 503–519. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010a). Mplus user’s guide. Sixth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén. Available on www.statmodel.com.
Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2010b). Mplus 6.1. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
Nyland, K. L. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modelling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Doctoral thesis, Los Angeles, CA, University of California.
O’Malley, P., Bachman, J. G., & Johnston, L. D. (1983). Reliability and consistency in self-reports of drug use. The International Journal of the Addictions, 18, 805–824. PubMed
PASW Statistics 18—SPSS. (2009). Somers, NY: IBM Corporation.
Putnam, S. P., Ellis, L. K., & Rothbart, M. K. (2001). The structure of temperament from infancy through adolescence. In A. Eliasz & A. Angleiter (Eds.), Advances/proceedings in research on temperament (pp. 165–182). Berlin: Pabst Scientist Publisher.
Tucker, J. S., Ellickson, P. L., Orlando, M., Martino, S.C., & Klein, D. J. (2005). Substance use trajectories from early adolescence to emerging adulthood: A comparison of smoking, binge drinking, and marijuana use. Journal of Drug Issues, Spring, 35, 307–332.
Van Havere, T., Vanderplasschen, W., Lammertyn, J., Broekaert, E., & Bellis, M. (2011). Drug use and nightlife: more than just dance music. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 6, 1–18. CrossRef
Verhulst, F. C., Van der Ende, J., & Koot, H. M. (1997). Handleiding voor de Youth Self-Report (YSR) [Manual for the Youth Self-Report]. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam.
- Predicting Transitions in Low and High Levels of Risk Behavior from Early to Middle Adolescence: The TRAILS Study
H. E. Creemers
S. A. Reijneveld
A. F. De Winter
F. Van Oort
W. A. M. Vollebergh
- Springer US