Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-09-2005 | Artikelen

Pesten

Over daders, slachtoffers, dader/slachtoffers en niet-betrokken leerlingen

Auteurs: Dr. René Veenstra, Siegwart Lindenberg, Mevr. Dr. Albertine J. Oldehinkel, Andrea F de Winter, Prof. Dr. Frank C. Verhulst, Johan Ormel

Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent | Uitgave 3/2005

Samenvatting

Onderzoek naar pesten is grotendeels gebaseerd op univariate analyses en gegevens van één informant. Onderzoekers weten daardoor te weinig van de simultane effecten van verschillende onafhankelijke en afhankelijke variabelen en het onderzoek wordt mogelijk vertekend door de zogeheten ‘shared method variance’. Het databestand voor dit onderzoek was groot (n = 1065) en rijk genoeg om gebruik te maken van multivariate analyses en verschillende informanten. Sekse, agressiviteit, isolement en afwijzing bleken het sterkst gerelateerd aan pesten. Afwijkend van eerdere bevindingen was dat niet alleen slachtoffers en dader/slachtoffers maar ook daders afgewezen werden door klasgenoten en dat opvoedingskenmerken niet gerelateerd waren aan pesten.

vorige artikel Omgaan met liefdesverdriet

volgende artikel Multisysteemtherapie, wel of niet toepassen?

Borooah, V. K. (2001). Logit and probit. Ordered and multinomial models. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.

Boulton, M. J., & Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.PubMed

Demaray, M. K., & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32, 471-489.

De Winter, A. F., Oldehinkel, A. J., Veenstra, R., Brunnekreef, J. A., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005). Evaluation of non-response bias in mental health determinants and outcomes in a large sample of pre-adolescents. European Journal of Epidemiology. 20, 173-181.CrossRefPubMed

Doll, B., Song, S., & Siemers, E. (2004). Classroom ecologies that support or discourage bullying. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 161-183). Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.

Espelage, D. L., Mebane, S. E., & Adams, R. S. (2004). Empathy, caring, and bullying: Toward an understanding of complex associations. In D. L. Espelage, & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention (pp. 37-61). Mahwah, nj: Erlbaum.

Estell, D. B., Farmer, T. W., & Cairns, B. D. (2004). Bullies and victims in rural African-American youth: Behavioral characteristics and social network placement. Unpublished work.

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., & Treiman, D. J. (1996). Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 International Standard Classification of Occupations. Social Science Research, 25, 201-239.CrossRef

Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. G. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 17-38.CrossRef

Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Pasupathi, M. (2002). Winning friends and influencing peers: Strategies of peer influence in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 466-474.CrossRef

Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Davis Crump, A., Saylor, K., Yu, K. et al. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29-49.CrossRef

Huisman, M. (2000). Imputation of missing item responses: Some simple techniques. Quality and Quantity, 34, 331-351.CrossRef

Juvonen, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2001). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer harassment in school. The plight of the vulnerable and victimized (pp. 105-124). New York: Guilford.

Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school - an indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661-674.CrossRefPubMed

Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2000). What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology, 36, 366-380.CrossRefPubMed

Klicpera, C., & Gasteiger Klicpera, B. (1996). Die Situation von ‘Tätern’ und ‘Opfern’ aggresiver Handlungen in der Schule. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 45, 2-9.PubMed

Kumpulainen, K., & Rasanen, E. (2000). Children involved in bullying at elementary school age: Their psychiatric symptoms and deviance in adolescence. An epidemiological sample. Child Abuse & Neglect, 24, 1567-1577.CrossRefPubMed

Liao, T. F. (1994). Interpreting probability models. Logit, probit, and other generalized linear models. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.

Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Thousand Oaks, ca: Sage.

Markus, M. T., Lindhout, I. E., Boer, F., Hoogendijk, T. H. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (2003). Factors of perceived parental rearing styles: the embu-c examined in a sample of Dutch primary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 503-519.CrossRef

Masten, A. S., Morison, P., & Pellegrini, D. S. (1985). A revised class play method of peer assessment. Developmental Psychology, 21, 523-533.CrossRef

Nansel, T. R., Craig, W., Overpeck, M. D., Saluja, G., Ruan, W. J., & the Health Behavior in School-aged Children Bullying Analyses Working Group (2004). Cross-national consistency in the relationship between bullying behaviors and psychosocial adjustment. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 158, 730-736.CrossRefPubMed

Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth - Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094-2100.CrossRefPubMed

Newcomb, A. F., Bukowski, W. M., & Pattee, L. (1993). Children’s peer relations: A meta-analytic review of popular, rejected, neglected, controversial, and average sociometric status. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 99-128.CrossRefPubMed

Olweus, D. (1993a). Bullying at school. What we know and what we can do. Oxford/Cambridge, ma: Blackwell.

Olweus, D. (1993b). Victimization by peers: Antecedents and long-term outcomes. In K. H. Rubin, & J. B. Asendorpf (Eds.), Social withdrawal, inhibition, and shyness in childhood (pp. 315-341). Hillsdale, nj: Erlbaum.

Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 216-224.CrossRef

Prinstein, M. J., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 310-342.CrossRef

Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384-400.

Royston, P. (2004). Multiple imputation of missing values. Stata Journal, 4, 227-241.

Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15.CrossRef

Schwartz, D. (2000). Subtypes of victims and aggressors in children’s peer groups. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 181-192.CrossRefPubMed

Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072-1085.CrossRefPubMed

Van Buuren, S., Boshuizen, H. C., & Knook, D. L. (1999). Multiple imputation of missing blood pressure covariates in survival analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 18, 681-694.CrossRefPubMed

Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S. M., Oldehinkel, A. J., De Winter, A. F., Verhulst, F. C., & Ormel, J. (2005, in druk). Bullying and victimization in elementary schools: A comparison of bullies, victims, bully/victims, and uninvolved preadolescents. Developmental Psychology, 41.

Wolke, D., Woods, S., Stanford, K., & Schulz, H. (2001). Bullying and victimization of primary school children in England and Germany: Prevalence and school factors. British Journal of Psychology, 92, 673-696.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Pesten
Over daders, slachtoffers, dader/slachtoffers en niet-betrokken leerlingen
Auteurs: Dr. René Veenstra
Siegwart Lindenberg
Mevr. Dr. Albertine J. Oldehinkel
Andrea F de Winter
Prof. Dr. Frank C. Verhulst
Johan Ormel
Publicatiedatum: 01-09-2005
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent / Uitgave 3/2005
Print ISSN: 0167-2436
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03060956

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2005

Niets zo praktisch als een goede theorie*

Automatismen van kinderlijke angst

Omgaan met liefdesverdriet

Het gelijk van Freud … over de oorsprong van abnormaal gedrag

Boekbespreking

Stroomopwaarts zwemmen