Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 11/2015

03-06-2015

Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version

Auteurs: Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes, Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa, Fernanda Ferreira Fuhro, Ana Carolina Tacollini Manzoni, Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira, Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 11/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

To translate, cross-culturally adapt and test the measurement properties of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ) short and long versions in Brazilian-Portuguese.

Methods

The ÖMPSQ versions were translated, cross-culturally adapted and pretested in 30 patients with acute and subacute non-specific low back pain. Internal consistency, reproducibility (reliability and agreement), construct validity, and ceiling and floor effects were tested in 100 patients. Construct validity was assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Pain Numerical Rating Scale.

Results

Internal consistency was adequate (ÖMPSQ: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83; ÖMPSQ-short: Cronbach’s alpha = 0.72). Reliability was substantial (ÖMPSQ: ICC2,1 0.76; ÖMPSQ-short: 0.78). Standard error of measurement was very good for the ÖMPSQ (5 %) and good for the ÖMPSQ-short (6.7 %); limits of agreement were 13.07 for the ÖMPSQ and 1.37 for the ÖMPSQ-short; and the minimum detectable change was 25.12 for the ÖMPSQ and 15.51 for the ÖMPSQ-short. The ÖMPSQ total score showed a good correlation with the RMDQ (r = 0.73) and the TSK (r = 0.64) and a moderate correlation with pain intensity (current pain: r = 0.36; last 2 weeks: r = 0.37; last episode: r = 0.46). Moreover, ÖMPSQ-short showed a good correlation with RMDQ (r = 0.69) and a moderate correlation with TSK (r = 0.57) and pain (current pain: r = 0.34; last 2 weeks: r = 0.36; last episode: r = 0.54). No ceiling or floor effects were detected in both versions.

Conclusion

The Brazilian-Portuguese ÖMPSQ and ÖMPSQ-short showed acceptable measurement properties and provide evidence that the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of ÖMPSQ and ÖMPSQ-short are similar to the original versions.
vorige artikel EQ-5D-3L as a health measure of Brazilian adult population
volgende artikel Turkish version of the Johns Hopkins Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire (RLS-QoL): validity and reliability study
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Vos, T., Flaxman, A. D., Naghavi, M., Lozano, R., Michaud, C., Ezzati, M., et al. (2012). Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2163–2196.CrossRefPubMed
2.
Murray, C. J., Vos, T., Lozano, R., Naghavi, M., Flaxman, A. D., Michaud, C., et al. (2012). Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990–2010: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet, 380(9859), 2197–2223.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Costa Lda, C., Koes, B. W., Pransky, G., Borkan, J., Maher, C. G., & Smeets, R. J. (2013). Primary care research priorities in low back pain: An update. Spine, 38(2), 148–156.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Melloh, M., Elfering, A., Egli Presland, C., Roeder, C., Barz, T., Rolli Salathe, C., et al. (2009). Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: A review of screening instruments. International Orthopaedics, 33(2), 301–313.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
5.
Boersma, K., & Linton, S. J. (2005). Screening to identify patients at risk: Profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 21(1), 38–43. discussion 69–72.CrossRefPubMed
6.
van Tulder, M., Becker, A., Bekkering, T., Breen, A., del Real, M. T., Hutchinson, A., et al. (2006). Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. European Spine Journal, 15(Suppl 2), S169–S191.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
Linton, S. J., & Hallden, K. (1998). Can we screen for problematic back pain? A screening questionnaire for predicting outcome in acute and subacute back pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 14(3), 209–215.CrossRefPubMed
8.
Grotle, M., Vollestad, N. K., & Brox, J. I. (2006). Screening for yellow flags in first-time acute low back pain: Reliability and validity of a Norwegian version of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 22(5), 458–467.CrossRefPubMed
9.
Nonclercq, O., & Berquin, A. (2012). Predicting chronicity in acute back pain: Validation of a French translation of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 55(4), 263–278.CrossRefPubMed
10.
Heneweer, H., van Woudenberg, N. J., van Genderen, F., Vanhees, L., & Wittink, H. (2010). Measuring psychosocial variables in patients with (sub) acute low back pain complaints, at risk for chronicity: A validation study of the Acute Low Back Pain Screening Questionnaire-Dutch Language Version. Spine, 35(4), 447–452.CrossRefPubMed
11.
Chan, S. F., Ho, S. M., Poon, K. W., Ip, A., & Cheung, O. Y. (2005). Pilot assessment of pain of orthopaedic patients in Hong Kong. Psychological Reports, 96(2), 527–532.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Linton, S. J., Nicholas, M., & MacDonald, S. (2011). Development of a short form of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire. Spine, 36(22), 1891–1895.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Costa, L. O., Maher, C. G., & Latimer, J. (2007). Self-report outcome measures for low back pain: Searching for international cross-cultural adaptations. Spine, 32(9), 1028–1037.CrossRefPubMed
14.
Maher, C., Latimer, J., & Costa, L. O. P. (2007). The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, 11, 245–252.
15.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191.CrossRefPubMed
16.
Stanton, T. R., Latimer, J., Maher, C. G., & Hancock, M. J. (2010). How do we define the condition ‘recurrent low back pain’? A systematic review. European Spine Journal: Official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 19(4), 533–539.CrossRef
17.
Linton, S. J., & Boersma, K. (2003). Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: The predictive validity of the Orebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire. Clinical Journal of Pain, 19(2), 80–86.CrossRefPubMed
18.
Costa, L., Maher, C., Latimer, J., Ferreira, P., Pozzi, G., & Ribeiro, R. (2007). Psychometric characteristics of the Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the Functional Rating Index and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Spine, 32(17), 1902–1907.CrossRefPubMed
19.
Costa, L. O., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., Ferreira, P. H., Ferreira, M. L., Pozzi, G. C., et al. (2008). Clinimetric testing of three self-report outcome measures for low back pain patients in Brazil: Which one is the best? Spine, 33(22), 2459–2463.CrossRefPubMed
20.
de Souza, F. S., Marinho Cda, S., Siqueira, F. B., Maher, C. G., & Costa, L. O. (2008). Psychometric testing confirms that the Brazilian-Portuguese adaptations, the original versions of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia have similar measurement properties. Spine, 33(9), 1028–1033.CrossRefPubMed
21.
Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.CrossRefPubMed
22.
de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., & Bouter, L. M. (2006). When to use agreement versus reliability measures. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 59(10), 1033–1039.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Fleiss, J. (1986). The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: Wiley.
24.
Chou, R., & Shekelle, P. (2010). Will this patient develop persistent disabling low back pain? Journal of the American Medical Association, 303(13), 1295–1302.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Örebro Questionnaire: short and long forms of the Brazilian-Portuguese version
Auteurs
Felipe Ribeiro Cabral Fagundes
Leonardo Oliveira Pena Costa
Fernanda Ferreira Fuhro
Ana Carolina Tacollini Manzoni
Naiane Teixeira Bastos de Oliveira
Cristina Maria Nunes Cabral
Publicatiedatum
03-06-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 11/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-0998-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2015

Quality of Life Research 11/2015 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Child and adolescent perceptions of oral health over the life course

Brief Communication

Turkish version of the Johns Hopkins Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life Questionnaire (RLS-QoL): validity and reliability study

OriginalPaper

Evaluation of the stages of completion and scoring of the Patient Generated Index (PGI) in patients with rheumatic diseases

OriginalPaper

Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management

Brief Communication

The development of summary components for the Disablement in the Physically Active scale in collegiate athletes

Brief Communication

Gender differences in psychological well-being: tests of factorial invariance