Top

Gepubliceerd in:

2017 | OriginalPaper | Hoofdstuk

21. Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF)

Auteur : Inka Logister-Proost, Ergotherapeut

Gepubliceerd in: Grondslagen van de ergotherapie

Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Samenvatting

Het Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF) is een raamwerk: een samenvatting van definities van begrippen in de ergotherapie en het ergotherapieproces en hoe dit alles in verband staat met elkaar. Het raamwerk is ontwikkeld om te verduidelijken wat de bijdrage van ergotherapie is aan gezondheid, welzijn en participatie van individuele personen en groepen en populaties, door hen te betrekken in het dagelijks handelen. Het OTPF maakt het ergotherapieparadigma concreet (Cole en Tufano (2008). Applied theories in occupational therapy: A practical approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack; zie H. 17). Het OTPF is geen ergotherapeutische taxonomie, theorie of model. Het raamwerk biedt wel een overzicht van begrippen en concrete voorbeelden. Door de ordening in tabellen brengt het structuur in de veelheid van ergotherapeutische begrippen. Het OTPF wordt gebruikt in combinatie met kennis en evidence die relevant is op het gebied van het dagelijks handelen en ergotherapie.

vorige hoofdstuk Het Kawa-model

volgende hoofdstuk Het Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP)-Model en het PEOP Occupational Therapy Process

AOTA. (1979). Occupational therapy product output reporting system and uniform terminology for reporting occupational therapy services. Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.

AOTA. (1989). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy (2nd ed.). Bethesda, MD: American Occupational Therapy Association.

AOTA. (1994). Uniform terminology for occupational therapy. (3rd ed.) American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 48(11), 1047–1054.

AOTA. (2002a). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain and process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(6), 609–639.

AOTA. (2002b). Position paper: Broadening the construct of independence. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(6), 660.CrossRef

AOTA. (2008). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (2nd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(6), 625–683.

AOTA. (2015). Occupational therapy practice framework: Domain & process (3rd ed.). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 68(Supplement 1), S1–S48.

Boyt-Schell, B. A., Gillen, G., & Scaffa, M. (2014a). Glossary. In B. A. Boyt-Schell, G. Gillen, & M. Scaffa (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 12, 1229–1243.

Boyt-Schell, B. A., & Schell, J. W. (2008). Clinical and professional reasoning in occupational therapy. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Christiansen, C. H., & Townsend, E. A. (Red.). (2010). Introduction to occupation: The art and science of living (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

Cole, M. B., & Tufano, R. (2008). Applied theories in occupational therapy: A practical approach. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Dunlea, A. (1996). An opportunity for co-adaptation: The experience of mothers and their infants who are blind. In R. Zemke & F. Clark (Red.), Occupational science: The evolving discipline (pag. 227–342). Philadelphia: FA Davis.

Dunton, W. R. (1934). The need for and value of research in occupational therapy. Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation, 13, 325–328.

Esdaile, S. A., & Olson, J. A. (2004). Mothering occupations: Challenge, agency, and participation. Philadelphia: FA Davis.

Fiese, B. H. (2007). Routines and rituals: Opportunities for participation in family health. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health, 27, 41–49.CrossRef

Fisher, A. G., & Griswold, L. A. (2014). Performance skills: Implementing performance analyses to evaluate quality of occupational performance. In B. A. Boyt-Schell, G. Gillen & M. Scaffa (Eds.), Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy (12th ed., pag. 606–609). Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins.

Gutman, S. A., Mortera, M. H., Hinojosa, J., & Kramer, P. (2007). Revision of the occupational therapy practice framework. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(1), 119–126.CrossRefPubMed

Hakansson, C., Dahlin-Ivanoff, S., & Sonn, U. (2006). Achieving balance in everyday life. Journal of Occupational Science, 13, 74–82.CrossRef

Hartingsveldt, M. J. van, Logister-Proost, I., & Kinébanian, A. (2010). Beroepsprofiel ergotherapeut. Utrecht: Ergotherapie Nederland/Boom Lemma.

Hartingsveldt, M. J. van, Hengelaar, R., & Logister-Proost, I. (2015). Praktijkcontexten van ergotherapeuten bewegen mee met de veranderingen in zorg en welzijn. Ergotherapie Magazine, 3, 40–46.

Heijsman, A., Lemette, M., Veld, A. de & Kuiper, C. (Red). (2007). Adviseren als ergotherapeut: Competenties en verhalen uit de praktijk. Den Haag: Boom Lemma.

Huber, M. A. S., Knottnerus, J. A., Green, L., et al. (2011). How should we define health? British Medical Journal, 343(4163), 235–237.

Kaljouw, M., & Vliet, K. van. (2015). Naar nieuwe zorg en zorgberoepen: De contouren. Zorginstituut Nederland.

Larson, E., & Zemke, R. (2003). Shaping the temporal patterns of our lives: The social coordination of occupation. Journal of Occupational Science, 10, 80–89.CrossRef

Loon, H. van, & Satink, T. (2006). Probleeminventarisatie en -analyse van handelen en omgeving. In A. Kinébanian & M. le Granse (Red.), Grondslagen van de ergotherapie (2e dr., pag. 687–715). Maarssen: Elsevier gezondheidszorg.

Meyer, A. (1922/1977). The philosophy of occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 31, 639–642. Reprinted from Archives of Occupational. Therapy, 1(1), 1–10.

Moyers, P. A. (1999). The guide to occupational therapy practice. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 53, 247–322.CrossRefPubMed

Nilsson, I., & Townsend, E. (2010). Occupational justice – bridging theory and practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 17, 57–63.CrossRefPubMed

Olsen, J. A. (2004). Mothering co-occupations in caring for infants and young children. In S. A. Esdaile & J. A. Olson (Red.), Mothering occupations (pag. 28–51). Philadelphia: FA Davis.

Pierce, D. (2001). Untangling occupation and activity. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(2), 138–146.CrossRefPubMed

Reed, K. L. (2005). An annotated history of the concepts used in occupational therapy. In C. H. Christiansen, C. M. Baum & J. Bass-Haugen (Eds.), Occupational therapy: Performance, participation, and well-being, (3rd ed., pag. 527–626). Thorofare, NJ: Slack.

Segal, R. (2004). Family routines and rituals: A context for occupational therapy interventions. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 499–508.CrossRefPubMed

Unruh, A. M. (2004). Reflections on: ‘So… what do you do?’ Occupation and the construction of identity. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 71, 290–295.CrossRef

WHO. (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.

Zemke, R. (2004). Time, space, and the kaleidoscopes of occupation (Eleanor Clarke Slagle Lecture). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 58, 608–620.CrossRefPubMed

Zemke, R., & Clark, F. (1996). Occupational science: An evolving discipline. Philadelphia: FA Davis.

Titel: Occupational Therapy Practice Framework (OTPF)
Auteur: Inka Logister-Proost, Ergotherapeut
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Boek: Grondslagen van de ergotherapie
Print ISBN: 978-90-368-1703-5

Elektronisch ISBN: 978-90-368-1704-2

Copyright: 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-368-1704-2_21

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Samenvatting

Log in om toegang te krijgen