Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

21-06-2023

Multidimensional Item Response Theory of the BIS/BAS Scales: Evidence for a Bifactor Model Structure

Auteurs: Yen-Ling Chen, Samantha N. Sherwood, Andrew J. Freeman

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 4/2023

Abstract

Carver and White’s Behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral Activation System Scales (BIS/BAS Scales) is the most commonly used measure of the behavioral inhibition/activation systems. However, the original four-factor model often required scale modifications to reach adequate model fits in other samples. Alternate factor structures have also been proposed. The current study examined competing factor solutions using multidimensional item response theory. Participants included 2,186 college students in a large, diverse university. Results indicate that the bifactor model performed significantly better than alternatives and demonstrated adequate model fit. Analyses of ω reliability, construct replicability, percent of uncontaminated correlations, and average relative parameter bias provide additional evidence that the use of bifactor model over a unidimensional or multidimensional, single-level structure is appropriate. Item discrimination and difficulty parameters identified areas of future development. The present findings suggest that the BIS/BAS Scales should be conceptualized as a bifactor structure including a BIS factor and a general BAS factor with three BAS specific subfactors (Drive, Fun Seeking, Reward Responsiveness). Additional refinement of the BAS subconstructs is necessary if they are planned for use.

vorige artikel Measuring Moral Injury: Further Validation of the MIES-C and EMIS-C in a Civilian Population

volgende artikel Cross-Cultural Measurement of Cyberbullying Perpetration and Victimization in India and the U.S.

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.CrossRef

Alloy, L. B., Abramson, L. Y., Walshaw, P. D., Cogswell, A., Grandin, L. D., Hughes, M. E., Iacoviello, B. M., Whitehouse, W. G., Urosevic, S., Nusslock, R., & Hogan, M. E. (2008). Behavioral Approach system and behavioral inhibition system sensitivities and bipolar spectrum disorders: Prospective prediction of bipolar mood episodes. Bipolar Disorders, 10(2), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-5618.2007.00547.x.CrossRefPubMed

Barnhart, W. R., & Buelow, M. T. (2017). Assessing impulsivity: Relationships between behavioral and self-report measures in individuals with and without self-reported ADHD. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 41–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.034.CrossRef

Beck, I., Smits, D. J. M., Claes, L., Vandereycken, W., & Bijttebier, P. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral inhibition/behavioral activation system scales and the sensitivity to punishment and sensitivity to reward questionnaire in a sample of eating disordered patients. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(5), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.007.CrossRef

Bijttebier, P., Beck, I., Claes, L., & Vandereycken, W. (2009). Gray’s reinforcement sensitivity theory as a framework for research on personality-psychopathology associations. Clinical Psychology Review, 29(5), 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.04.002.CrossRefPubMed

Bjørnebekk, G. (2009). Psychometric Properties of the Scores on the behavioral inhibition and activation scales in a sample of norwegian children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(4), 636–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323239.CrossRef

Bonifay, W., & Cai, L. (2017). On the complexity of Item Response Theory Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52(4), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1309262.CrossRefPubMed

Bonifay, W., Lane, S. P., & Reise, S. P. (2017). Three concerns with applying a bifactor model as a structure of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science, 5, 184–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702616657069.CrossRef

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative Ways of assessing Model Fit. Sociological Methods & Research, 21(2), 230–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124192021002005.CrossRef

Campbell-Sills, L., Liverant, G. I., & Brown, T. A. (2004). Psychometric evaluation of the behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral activation Scales in a large sample of outpatients with anxiety and Mood Disorders. Psychological Assessment, 16, 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.16.3.244.CrossRefPubMed

Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.CrossRef

Chalmers, R. P. (2012). Mirt: A Multidimensional Item Response Theory Package for the R environment. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i06.CrossRef

Cogswell, A., Alloy, L. B., van Dulmen, M. H. M., & Fresco, D. M. (2006). A psychometric evaluation of behavioral inhibition and approach self-report measures. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(8), 1649–1658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.008.CrossRef

Corr, P. J. (2004). Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.01.005.CrossRef

DeMars, C. E. (2013). A tutorial on interpreting Bifactor Model Scores. International Journal of Testing, 13(4), 354–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2013.799067.CrossRef

Demianczyk, A. C., Jenkins, A. L., Henson, J. M., & Conner, B. T. (2014). Psychometric evaluation and revision of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales in a diverse sample of young adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(5), 485–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.870570.CrossRefPubMed

Fan, X. (1998). Item response theory and classical test theory: An empirical comparison of their Item/Person Statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058003001.CrossRef

Franken, I. H. A., & Muris, P. (2006). BIS/BAS personality characteristics and college students’ substance use. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(7), 1497–1503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.12.005.CrossRef

Franken, I. H. A., Muris, P., & Rassin, E. (2005). Psychometric Properties of the dutch BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-005-3262-2.CrossRef

Gable, S. L., Reis, H. T., & Elliot, A. J. (2000). Behavioral activation and inhibition in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 1135–1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.6.1135.CrossRef

Gray, J. A. (1970). The psychophysiological basis of introversion-extraversion. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 8(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(70)90069-0.CrossRefPubMed

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2003). Fundamentals of the septo-hippocampal system. In J. A. Gray & N. McNaughton (Eds.), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: An enquiry into the function of the septo-hippocampal system (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198522713.003.0009.

Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. Structural Equation Modeling: Present and Future, 195, 216.

Heym, N., Ferguson, E., & Lawrence, C. (2008). An evaluation of the relationship between Gray’s revised RST and Eysenck’s PEN: Distinguishing BIS and FFFS in Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 709–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.013.CrossRef

Holzinger, K. J., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287965.CrossRef

Hundt, N. E., Nelson-Gray, R. O., Kimbrel, N. A., Mitchell, J. T., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). The interaction of reinforcement sensitivity and life events in the prediction of anhedonic depression and mixed anxiety-depression symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.02.021.CrossRef

Johnson, S. L., Turner, R. J., & Iwata, N. (2003). BIS/BAS levels and Psychiatric Disorder: An epidemiological study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 25(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022247919288.CrossRef

Jorm, A. F., Christensen, H., Henderson, A. S., Jacomb, P. A., Korten, A. E., & Rodgers, B. (1998). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3.CrossRef

Leone, L. (2009). Testing conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A comment and extension on Smillie, Jackson, and Dalgleish (2006). Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.004.CrossRef

Maack, D. J., & Ebesutani, C. (2018). A re-examination of the BIS/BAS scales: Evidence for BIS and BAS as unidimensional scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 27(2), e1612. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1612.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Magno, C. (2009). Demonstrating the difference between classical test theory and item response theory using derived test data. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 1, 1–11.

Markon, K. E. (2019). Bifactor and hierarchical models: Specification, inference, and interpretation. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 15(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095522.CrossRefPubMed

Moreira, D., Almeida, F., Pinto, M., Segarra, P., & Barbosa, F. (2015). Data concerning the psychometric properties of the behavioral Inhibition/Behavioral activation scales for the portuguese population. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1117–1122. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000108.CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, B., Kaplan, D., & Hollis, M. (1987). On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika, 52(3), 431–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365.CrossRef

National Institute of Mental Health (2016). Behavioral Assessment Methods for RDoC Constructs. https://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/advisory-boards-and-groups/namhc/reports/behavioral-assessment-methods-for-rdoc-constructs.

Pagliaccio, D., Luking, K. R., Anokhin, A. P., Gotlib, I. H., Hayden, E. P., Olino, T. M., Peng, C. Z., Hajcak, G., & Barch, D. M. (2016). Revising the BIS/BAS scale to study development: Measurement invariance and normative effects of age and sex from childhood through adulthood. Psychological Assessment, 28, 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000186.CrossRefPubMed

Poythress, N. G., Skeem, J. L., Weir, J., Lilienfeld, S. O., Douglas, K. S., Edens, J. F., & Kennealy, P. J. (2008). Psychometric properties of Carver and White’s (1994) BIS/BAS scales in a large sample of offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(8), 732–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.021.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.

Reckase, M. D. (2009). Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models. In M. D. Reckase (Ed.), Multidimensional Item Response Theory (pp. 79–112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89976-3_4.

Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553.CrossRefPubMed

Reise, S. P., Kim, D. S., Mansolf, M., & Widaman, K. F. (2016). Is the Bifactor Model a better model or is it just better at modeling implausible responses? Application of Iteratively reweighted least squares to the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 51(6), 818. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2016.1243461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W., & Haviland, M. G. (2018). Bifactor Modelling and the evaluation of Scale Scores. The Wiley Handbook of Psychometric Testing (pp. 675–707). Ltd: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118489772.ch22.CrossRef

Reniers, R. L. E. P., Murphy, L., Lin, A., Bartolomé, S. P., & Wood, S. J. (2016). Risk perception and risk-taking Behaviour during Adolescence: The influence of personality and gender. PLOS ONE, 11(4), e0153842. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153842.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Reuter, M., Cooper, A. J., Smillie, L. D., Markett, S., & Montag, C. (2015). A new measure for the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory: Psychometric criteria and genetic validation. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 9. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2015.00038.

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, Beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika, 74(1), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.CrossRef

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying Bifactor Statistical Indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249.CrossRefPubMed

Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21, 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045.CrossRefPubMed

Ross, S. R., Millis, S. R., Bonebright, T. L., & Bailley, S. E. (2002). Confirmatory factor analysis of the behavioral inhibition and activation scales. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(6), 861–865. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00196-9.CrossRef

Schwarz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344136.CrossRef

Segarra, P., Poy, R., López, R., & Moltó, J. (2014). Characterizing Carver and White’s BIS/BAS subscales using the five factor model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 61–62, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.12.027.CrossRef

Smillie, L. D., Jackson, C. J., & Dalgleish, L. I. (2006). Conceptual distinctions among Carver and White’s (1994) BAS scales: A reward-reactivity versus trait impulsivity perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(5), 1039–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.10.012.CrossRef

Stucky, B. D., & Edelen, M. O. (2015). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (pp. 183–206). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

Studer, J., Baggio, S., Mohler-Kuo, M., Daeppen, J. B., & Gmel, G. (2016). Factor structure and psychometric properties of a french and german shortened version of the behavioural inhibition System/Behavioural activation system scales. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 25(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1486.CrossRefPubMed

Sutton, S. K., & Davidson, R. J. (1997). Prefrontal brain asymmetry: A biological substrate of the behavioral approach and inhibition systems. Psychological Science, 8, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00413.x.CrossRef

Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and recommendations for Organizational Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002.CrossRef

Vandeweghe, L., Matton, A., Beyers, W., Vervaet, M., Braet, C., & Goossens, L. (2016). Psychometric Properties of the BIS/BAS scales and the SPSRQ in flemish adolescents. Psychologica Belgica, 56(4), 406–420. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.298.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yu, R., Branje, S. J. T., Keijsers, L., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2011). Psychometric characteristics of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS scales in dutch adolescents and their mothers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(5), 500–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2011.595745.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Multidimensional Item Response Theory of the BIS/BAS Scales: Evidence for a Bifactor Model Structure
Auteurs: Yen-Ling Chen
Samantha N. Sherwood
Andrew J. Freeman
Publicatiedatum: 21-06-2023
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 4/2023
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-023-10064-6

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Multidimensional Item Response Theory of the BIS/BAS Scales: Evidence for a Bifactor Model Structure

Abstract

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2023

The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale in Adulthood: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach

Ready or Not: Predictors of Mother and Father Readiness for Change in a Clinical Sample

What Are They Measuring? Testing the Convergent Validity of State and Trait Mindfulness Measures Across Two Independent Samples

Trauma Centrality Moderates the Relationship Between PTSD Symptoms and Trigger Warning Receptivity

Psychometric Properties of Two Independent Measures Evaluating Uncertainty and Ambiguity

Positive Affect Dampening Prospectively Predicts Changes in Chronic Life Stress, but Not Episodic Stress Generation Among Adolescents

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

The Substance Use Risk Profile Scale in Adulthood: An Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling Approach

Ready or Not: Predictors of Mother and Father Readiness for Change in a Clinical Sample

What Are They Measuring? Testing the Convergent Validity of State and Trait Mindfulness Measures Across Two Independent Samples

Trauma Centrality Moderates the Relationship Between PTSD Symptoms and Trigger Warning Receptivity

Psychometric Properties of Two Independent Measures Evaluating Uncertainty and Ambiguity

Positive Affect Dampening Prospectively Predicts Changes in Chronic Life Stress, but Not Episodic Stress Generation Among Adolescents