Skip to main content
Log in

On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A general latent variable model is given which includes the specification of a missing data mechanism. This framework allows for an elucidating discussion of existing general multivariate theory bearing on maximum likelihood estimation with missing data. Here, missing completely at random is not a prerequisite for unbiased estimation in large samples, as when using the traditional listwise or pairwise present data approaches. The theory is connected with old and new results in the area of selection and factorial invariance. It is pointed out that in many applications, maximum likelihood estimation with missing data may be carried out by existing structural equation modeling software, such as LISREL and LISCOMP. Several sets of artifical data are generated within the general model framework. The proposed estimator is compared to the two traditional ones and found superior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, T. W. (1957). Maximum likelihood estimates for a multivariate normal distribution when some observations are missing.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, 200–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, E. L., & Little, R. J. A. (1975). Missing values in multivariate analysis.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 37, 129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, R. D., & Aitkin, M. (1981). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation of item parameters: Application of an EM algorithm.Psychometrika, 46, 443–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, A. (1983).On the robustness of the LISREL (maximum likelihood estimation) against small sample size and nonnormality. Unpublished doctoral, dissertation, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H. (1983). Asymptotic comparison of missing data procedures for estimating factor loadings.Psychometrika, 48, 269–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 39, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, W. J. (1983). BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner, C. (1979). Estimation for the multiple factor model when data are missing.Psychometrika, 44, 409–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, H. O., & Hocking, R. R. (1971). The analysis of incomplete data.Biometrics, 14, 174–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, J. A., & Wise, D. A. (1979). Attrition bias in experimental and panel data: The Gary income maintenance experiment.Econometrica, 47, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1976). The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models.Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5, 475–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, N. L., & Kotz, S. (1972).Distributions in statistics: Continuous multivariate distributions. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis.Psychometrika, 34, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populationsPsychometrika, 36, 409–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1977). Structural equation models in the social sciences: Specification, estimation and testing. In P. R. Krishnaiah (Ed.),Applications of statistics. Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1980). Simultaneous analysis of longitudinal data from several cohorts. Research Report 80-5, Department of Statistics, University of Uppsala, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI; Analysis of linear structural relationships by maximum likelihood and least squares methods. Scientific Software.

  • Lawley, D. N. (1943–1944). A note on Karl Pearson's selection formulae.Proceedings of the Royal Society Edinburgh, Section A (Mathematics and Physics Section), 62(1), 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1982). Models for nonresponse in sample surveys.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 77, 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1983). The ignorable case. W. G. Modon, I. Olkin, & D. R. Rubin (Eds.), InIncomplete data in sample surveys, Vol. 2: Theory and bibliographies. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A. (1985). A note about models for selectivity bias.Econometrica, 53(6), 1469–1474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. R. (1987).Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marini, M. M., Olsen, A. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation in panel studies with missing data. In K. F. Schuessler (Ed.),Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1964). Notes on factorial invariance.Psychometrika, 29, 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., 1984. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators.Psychometrika, 49, 115–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (1985). Moments of the censored and truncated bivariate normal distribution. Submitted for publication.

  • Muthén, B. (1987).LISCOMP. Analysis of linear structural equations using a comprehensive measurement model. User's guide. Scientific Software.

  • Muthén, B., & Jöreskog, K. (1983). Selectivity problems in quasi-experimental studies.Evaluation Review, 7, 139–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 33, 171–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson, U. (1978). Selection bias in confirmatory factor analysis (Department of Statistics Research, Report No. 78-4). Uppsala, Sweden: University of Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1912). On the general theory of the influence of selection on correlation and variation.Biometrika, 8, 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenbaum, S. (1961). Moments of a truncated bivariate normal distribution.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 23, 405–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1974). Characterizing the estimation of parameters in incomplete data problems.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 456–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data.Biometrika, 63, 581–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallis, G. M. (1961). The moment generating function of the truncated multi-normal distribution.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 23, 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trawinski, I. M., & Bargmann, R. E. (1964). Maximum likelihood estimation with incomplete multivariate data.Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35, 647–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1974). Quasi-likelihood functions, generalized linear models and the Gauss-Newton method.Biometrika, 61, 439–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werts, C. E., Rock, D. A., & Grandy, J. (1979). Confirmatory factor analysis applications: Missing data problems and comparison of path models between populations.Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, B., Muthén, B., Alwin, D. F., & Summers, G. F. (1977). Assessing reliability and stability in panel models. In D. R. Heise (Ed.),Sociological methodology, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The research of the first author was supported by grant No. SES-8312583 from the National Science Foundation and by a Spencer Foundation grant. We wish to thank Chuen-Rong Chan for drawing the path diagram.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muthén, B., Kaplan, D. & Hollis, M. On structural equation modeling with data that are not missing completely at random. Psychometrika 52, 431–462 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294365

Key words

Navigation