Top

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Gepubliceerd in:

03-01-2021 | Original Article

To Approach or to Avoid: The Role of Ambivalent Motivation in Attentional Biases to Threat and Spider Fear

Auteurs: Mengran Xu, Katelyn Rowe, Christine Purdon

Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Background

People with anxiety difficulties show different patterns in their deployment of attention to threat compared to people without anxiety difficulties. These attentional biases are assumed to play a critical role in the development and persistence of anxiety. However, little is known about factors that influence attentional biases to threat. An emerging body of evidence suggests that visual attention to threat varies across the time course according to one’s motivation to approach vs. avoid threat.

Methods

In order to better understand the relationship between motivation, attentional biases to threat, and anxiety, we had participants high in spider fear complete a sustained-attention task in full view of a live tarantula while their eye movements were tracked.

Results

Participants who were ambivalent about whether to look at the spider or to avoid looking exhibited a unique pattern of visual attention to the spider, and reported higher spider fear and more negative affect than did other participants at the end of the study.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that anxiety persistence may have more to do with goal prioritization than innate attentional biases. Future studies of attentional biases to threat should take motivation into account and study attention across the time course. Ambivalent motivation to threat should also be targeted in exposure therapy.

vorige artikel Heightened Sense of Incompleteness in Excoriation (Skin-Picking) Disorder

volgende artikel A Dissociation Between Two Cognitive Biases in Acute Stress Disorder: Preliminary Evidence for the Reverse Gambling Fallacy

Amir, I., Zvielli, A., & Bernstein, A. (2016). (De) coupling of our eyes and our mind’s eye: A dynamic process perspective on attentional bias. Emotion, 16(7), 978–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000172.CrossRefPubMed

Amir, N., Elias, J., Klumpp, H., & Przeworski, A. (2003). Attentional bias to threat in social phobia: Facilitated processing of threat or difficulty disengaging attention from threat? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(11), 1325–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(03)00039-1.CrossRefPubMed

Andersson, G., Waara, J., Jonsson, U., Malmaeus, F., Carlbring, P., & Ost, L. G. (2009). Internet-based self-help versus one-session exposure in the treatment of spider phobia: a randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 38(2), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/16506070902931326.CrossRefPubMed

Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2007). Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and nonanxious individuals: a meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.1.CrossRefPubMed

Bryant, R. A., & Harvey, A. G. (1995). Processing threatening information in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(3), 537–541.CrossRef

Buckley, T. C., Blanchard, E. B., & Hickling, E. J. (2002). Automatic and strategic processing of threat stimuli: A comparison between PTSD, panic disorder, and non-anxiety controls. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26(1), 97–115.CrossRef

Chen, M., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). Consequences of automatic evaluation: Immediate behavioral predispositions to approach or avoid the stimulus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(2), 215–224.CrossRef

Cisler, J. M., & Koster, E. H. (2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.003.CrossRefPubMed

Cisler, J. M., & Olatunji, B. O. (2010). Components of attentional biases in contamination fear: evidence for difficulty in disengagement. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.003.CrossRefPubMed

Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(Pt 3), 245–265.CrossRef

Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. A. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychologuy, 111(2), 225–236.CrossRef

Dunning, J. P., & Hajcak, G. (2009). See no evil: directing visual attention within unpleasant images modulates the electrocortical response. Psychophysiology, 46(1), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00723.x.CrossRefPubMed

Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804–818. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804.CrossRefPubMed

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191.CrossRef

Fowles, D. C. (1987). Psychophysiology and psychopathology: A motivational approach. Psychophysiology, 25(4), 373–391.CrossRef

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R., & Dutton, K. (2001). Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.681.CrossRef

Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Healey, A., Mansell, W., & Tai, S. (2019). How does goal conflict, and awareness of goal conflict, relate to distress, dysfunction and the outcomes of exposure in spider fear? https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.22398.43843.

Hermans, D., Vansteenwegen, D., & Eelen, P. (1999). Eye movement registration as a continuous index of attention deployment: Data from a group of a spider anxious students. Cognition and Emotion, 13(4), 419–434.CrossRef

Johnson, D. R. (2009). Goal-directed attentional deployment to emotional faces and individual differences in emotional regulation. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2008.09.006.CrossRef

Kamphuis, J. H., & Telch, M. J. (2000). Effects of distraction and guided threat reappraisal on fear reduction during exposure-based treatments for specific fears. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(12), 1163–1181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00147-3.CrossRefPubMed

Kashdan, T. B., Adams, L., Read, J., & Hawk, L., Jr. (2012). Can a one-hour session of exposure treatment modulate startle response and reduce spider fears? Psychiatry Research, 196(1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2011.12.002.CrossRefPubMed

Kelly, R. E., Mansell, W., & Wood, A. M. (2015). Goal conflict and well-being: A review and hierarchical model of goal conflict, ambivalence, self-discrepancy and self-concordance. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.05.011.CrossRef

Klein, A. M., Becker, E. S., & Rinck, M. (2011). Approach and avoidance tendencies in spider fearful children: the approach-avoidance task. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20(2), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-010-9402-7.CrossRefPubMed

Koster, E. H., Crombez, G., Verschuere, B., Van Damme, S., & Wiersema, J. R. (2006). Components of attentional bias to threat in high trait anxiety: Facilitated engagement, impaired disengagement, and attentional avoidance. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1757–1771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.011.CrossRefPubMed

Lipp, O. V., Derakshan, N., Waters, A. M., & Logies, S. (2004). Snakes and cats in the flower bed: Fast detection is not specific to pictures of fear-relevant animals. Emotion, 4(3), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.4.3.233.CrossRefPubMed

Mathews, A., & Mackintosh, B. (1998). Cognitive model of selective processing in anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 22(6), 539–560. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018738019346.CrossRef

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1998). A cognitive-motivational analysis of anxiety. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36(9), 809–848.CrossRef

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2005). Attentional bias in generalized anxiety disorder versus depressive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-005-1646-y.CrossRef

Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(9), 1241–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.05.003.CrossRefPubMed

Mogg, K., Bradley, B. P., Miles, F., & Dixon, R. (2004). Time course of attentional bias for threat scenes: Testing the vigilance-avoidance hypothesis. Cognition & Emotion, 18(5), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000158.CrossRef

Muris, P., & Merckelbach, H. (1996). A comparison of two spider fear questionnaires. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 27(3), 241–244.CrossRef

Nelson, A. L., Purdon, C., Quigley, L., Carriere, J., & Smilek, D. (2015). Distinguishing the roles of trait and state anxiety on the nature of anxiety-related attentional biases to threat using a free viewing eye movement paradigm. Cognition Emotion, 29(3), 504–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.922460.CrossRefPubMed

Ohman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 130(3), 466–478. https://doi.org/10.1037/AXJ96-3445.130.3.466.CrossRefPubMed

Paulitzki, J. R., Risko, E. F., Oakman, J. M., & Stolz, J. A. (2008). Doing the unpleasant: How the emotional nature of a threat-relevant task affects task-switching. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(5), 350–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.003.CrossRef

Pittig, A., Brand, M., Pawlikowski, M., & Alpers, G. W. (2014). The cost of fear: Avoidant decision making in a spider gambling task. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2014.03.001.CrossRefPubMed

Psychology Software Tools, I. (2007). E-prime 2.0 professional. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Inc.

Rachman, S. (2004). Anxiety (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.

Ranganathan, P., Pramesh, C. S., & Buyse, M. (2016). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The perils of multiple testing. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 7(2), 106–107. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.179436.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Richeson, J. A., & Trawalter, S. (2008). The threat of appearing prejudiced and race-based attentional biases. Psychological Science, 19(2), 98–102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02052.x.CrossRefPubMed

Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2006). Spider fearful individuals attend to threat, then quickly avoid it: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115(2), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.115.2.231.CrossRefPubMed

Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001.CrossRefPubMed

Rinck, M., Becker, E. S., Kellermann, J., & Roth, W. T. (2003). Selective attention in anxiety: Distraction and enhancement in visual search. Depression and Anxiety, 18(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10105.CrossRefPubMed

Rinck, M., Reinecke, A., Ellwart, T., Heuer, K., & Becker, E. S. (2005). Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(2), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.235.CrossRefPubMed

Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., & Smilek, D. (2015a). Not all mind wandering is created equal: Dissociating deliberate from spontaneous mind wandering. Psychological Research, 79(5), 750–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0617-x.CrossRefPubMed

Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering minds and wavering rhythms: Linking mind wandering and behavioral variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030954.CrossRefPubMed

Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., Xu, M., Purdon, C., & Smilek, D. (2015b). Motivation, intentionality, and mind wandering: Implications for assessments of task-unrelated thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1417–1425. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000116.CrossRefPubMed

SensoMotoric Instruments Inc. (2009). iView X system manual. Teltow, Germany: SensoMotoric Instruments, Inc.

SensoMotoric Instruments Inc. (2014). BeGaze manual. Teltow, Germany: SensoMotoric Instruments, Inc.

Siegel, P., & Warren, R. (2013). The effect of very brief exposure on experienced fear after in vivo exposure. Cognition Emotion, 27(6), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2012.756803.CrossRefPubMed

Szymanski, J., & O’Donohue, W. (1995). Fear of spiders questionnaire. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 26(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)00072-T.CrossRefPubMed

Teachman, B. A., & Woody, S. R. (2003). Automatic processing in spider phobia: Implicit fear associations over the course of treatment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(1), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.1.100.CrossRefPubMed

Van Bockstaele, B., Verschuere, B., Koster, E. H., Tibboel, H., De Houwer, J., & Crombez, G. (2011). Effects of attention training on self-reported, implicit, physiological and behavioural measures of spider fear. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 42(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.12.004.CrossRefPubMed

Vrijsen, J. N., Fleurkens, P., Nieuwboer, W., & Rinck, M. (2009). Attentional bias to moving spiders in spider fearful individuals. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(4), 541–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2008.11.002.CrossRefPubMed

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.CrossRef

Williams, J. M., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1988). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders. Chichester, England: Wiley.

Wilson, K. M., Russell, P. N., & Helton, W. S. (2015). Spider stimuli improve response inhibition. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 406–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.014.CrossRefPubMed

Xu, M., Purdon, C., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2017). Mindfulness and mind wandering: The protective effects of brief meditation in anxious individuals. Consciousness and Cognition, 51, 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.03.009.CrossRefPubMed

Yiend, J., & Mathews, A. (2001). Anxiety and attention to threatening pictures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54(3), 665–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755991.CrossRef

Zlomke, K., & Davis, T. E., 3rd. (2008). One-session treatment of specific phobias: A detailed description and review of treatment efficacy. Behavior Therapy, 39(3), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2007.07.003.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: To Approach or to Avoid: The Role of Ambivalent Motivation in Attentional Biases to Threat and Spider Fear
Auteurs: Mengran Xu
Katelyn Rowe
Christine Purdon
Publicatiedatum: 03-01-2021
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Cognitive Therapy and Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0147-5916
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2819
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-020-10193-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

Regulating Emotionality to Manage Adversity: A Systematic Review of the Relation Between Emotion Regulation and Psychological Resilience

The Effects of Mindfulness Meditation on Attention, Executive Control and Working Memory in Healthy Adults: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Positive and Negative Emotion Regulation in College Athletes: A Preliminary Exploration of Daily Savoring, Acceptance, and Cognitive Reappraisal

Can Gender Differences in Distress Due to Difficult Voices Be Explained by Differences in Relating?

The Effects of Interpersonal Support on Treatment Outcomes Using Cognitive Processing Therapy

Social Anxiety Disorder and the Fear of Death: An Empirical Investigation of the Terror Management Approach towards Understanding Clinical Anxiety