Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This study reports about teacher motivation and work engagement in a Dutch University Medical Centre (UMC). We examined factors affecting the motivation for teaching in a UMC, the engagement of UMC Utrecht teaching faculty in their work, and their engagement in teaching compared with engagement in patient care and research. Based on a pilot study within various departments at the UMCU, a survey on teaching motivation and work engagement was developed and sent to over 600 UMCU teachers. About 50 % responded. Work engagement was measured by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale, included in this survey. From a list of 22 pre-defined items, 5 were marked as most motivating: teaching about my own speciality, noticeable appreciation for teaching by my direct superior, teaching small groups, feedback on my teaching performance, and freedom to determine what I teach. Feedback on my teaching performance showed the strongest predictive value for teaching engagement. Engagement scores were relatively favourable, but engagement with patient care was higher than with research and teaching. Task combinations appear to decrease teaching engagement. Our results match with self-determination theory and the job demands–resources model, and challenge the policy to combine teaching with research and patient care.
Bakker AB. Flow among music teachers and their students: the crossover of peak experiences. J Vocat Behav. 2005;66:26–44. CrossRef
Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Van den Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, Witte H, Lens W. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work Stress. 2008;22:277–94. CrossRef
Bakker AB, Demerouti E. The job demands–resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol. 2007;22:309–28. CrossRef
Christian MS, Garza AS, Slaughter JE. Work engagement: a quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance. Pers Psychol. 2011;64:89–136. CrossRef
Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, Gonzélez-Romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a confirmative analytic approach. J Happiness Stud. 2002;3:71–92. CrossRef
Schaufeli W, Bakker A, Salanova M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. A cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas. 2006;66:701–16. CrossRef
Hof H, Tombrock-Hofmeijer MC, Bakker AB. Bevlogenheid en prestaties van leraren en leerlingen [Engagement and performance among teachers and their students], MA Thesis. Zaltbommel, the Netherlands: Schouten & Nelissen; 2007.
Schaufeli W, Bakker AB. Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:293–315. CrossRef
- Key factors in work engagement and job motivation of teaching faculty at a university medical centre
B. A. M. van den Berg
Arnold B. Bakker
Th. J. ten Cate
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum