Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
In recent years, medical faculties at Dutch universities have implemented a legally binding study advice to students of medicine and biomedical sciences during their propaedeutic phase. Appropriate examination is essential to discriminate between poor (grade <6), moderate (grade 6–8) and excellent (grade ≥8) students. Therefore, we compared the discriminatory properties of extended matching questions (EMQs) versus multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and identified the role of sex, age and examination preference on this score. Data were collected for 452 first-year medical and biomedical science students during three distinct course examinations: one examination with EMQ only, one with MCQ only and one mixed examination (including EMQ and MCQ). Logistic regression analysis revealed that MCQ examination was 3 times better in identifying poor students compared with EMQ (RR 3.0, CI 2.0–4.5), whereas EMQ better detected excellent students (average grade ≥8) (RR 1.93, CI 1.47–2.53). Mixed examination had comparable characteristics to MCQ. Sex and examination preference did not impact the score of the student. Students ≥20 years had a 4-fold higher risk ratio of obtaining a poor grade (<6) compared with students ≤18 years old (RR 4.1, CI 2.1–8.0). Given the strong discriminative capacity of MCQ examinations to identify poor students, we recommend the use of this type of examination during the propaedeutic phase of medicine and biomedical science study programmes, in the light of the binding study advice.
Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen. Bindend studieadvies 2011–2012. 2011. www.ru.nl/studenten/vm/bindend-studieadvies/. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
Kuppeveld S, van de Lisdonk, E., van Goor, H., Bulte, J., Laan, R. Kritische reflectie geneeskunde 2011. Nijmegen: UMC st. Radboud. 2011. http://iwooweb.umcn.nl/fmw/PDFforms/Algemeen/Visitaties/Kritische_reflectie_GNK_2011.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2013.
Airasian PW. Classroom assessment. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
Scouller K. The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. High Educ. 1998;35:452–72. CrossRef
Case SM, Swanson DB. Extended matching items: a practical alternative to free response questions. Teach Learn Med. 1993;5:107–15. CrossRef
Wood EJ. What are extended matching sets questions? BEEj. 2003;1(1).
Wilson RB, Case SM. Extended matching questions: an alternative to multiple-choice or free-response questions. J Vet Med Educ. 1993;20(3).
Chandratilake M, Davis M, Ponnamperuma G. Assessment of medical knowledge: the pros and cons of using true/false multiple choice questions. Nat Med J India. 2011;24(4):225–8.
Nijmegen University. Enrollment criteria for medicine and biomedical sciences. 2013. www.ru.nl.
van Berkel H, Bax A. Toetsen in het hoger onderwijs. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2006.
Diamond J, Evans W. The correction for guessing. Rev Educ Res. 1973;43:181–91. CrossRef
Amsterdam Uv. Binding study advice. http://www.student.uva.nl/feb_bindingstudyadvice. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. Binding study advice. http://www.vu.nl/nl/opleidingen/bacheloropleidingen/opleidingenoverzicht/c-f/computer-science/binding-recommendation/index.asp. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Binding study advice. http://www.rug.nl/education/find-out-more/studying-at-university/the-binding-study-advice?lang=en. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Universiteit Leiden. Regulations on binding study advice. http://www.regulations.leiden.edu/education-students/regulation-on-the-binding-study-advice.html. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Rotterdam EU. Binding study advice 2011–1012. http://www.eur.nl/english/essc/advice_counselling/binding_study_advice/ Accessed 13 February 2013.
Maastricht Universiteit. Binding study advice. 2012–2013. http://www.maastrichtuniversity.nl/web/Faculties/FASoS/TargetGroups/ProspectiveStudents/BachelorsProgrammes/EuropeanStudies/ProgrammeInformation/BindingStudyAdvice.htm. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Universiteit Utrecht. Binding study advice. http://www.uu.nl/EN/informationfor/students/regulations/Pages/bindendstudieadvies.aspx. Accessed 13 Feb 2013.
Burton RF, Miller DJ. Statistical modelling of multiple-choice and true/false tests: ways of considering, and of reducing, the uncertainties attributable to guessing. Assess Eval High Educ. 1999;24:399–411. CrossRef
Bush M. A multiple choice test that rewards partial knowledge. J Furth High Educ. 2001;25:157–63. CrossRef
Budescu D, Bar-Hillel M. To guess or not to guess: a decision-theoric view of formula scoring. J Educ Meas. 1993;30:227–91. CrossRef
Walker DM, Thompson JS. A note on multiple choice exams, with respect to students’ risks preference and confidence. Assess Eval High Educ. 2001;26:261–7. CrossRef
Didia D, Hasnat B. The determinants of performance in the university introductory finance course. Financ Pract Educ. 1998;8(1):102–7.
Anderson G, Benjamin D. The determinants of success in university introductory economics courses. J Econ Educ. 1994;25(2):99–118. CrossRef
Peiperl M, Trevelyan R. Predictors of performance at business school and beyond: Demographic factors and the contrast between individual and group outcomes. J Manage Dev. 1997;16(5–6):354–67. CrossRef
Simkin MG, Kuechler WL. Multiple-choice tests and student understanding: what is the connection. Decis Sci J Innov Educ. 2005;3:73–97. CrossRef
Nicol D. E-assessment by design: using multiple-choice tests to good effect. J Furth High Educ. 2007;31:53–64. CrossRef
- Multiple choice questions are superior to extended matching questions to identify medicine and biomedical sciences students who perform poorly
Thijs M. H. Eijsvogels
Tessa L. van den Brand
Maria T. E. Hopman
- Bohn Stafleu van Loghum