Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Interpretation of ambiguity is consistently associated with anxiety in children, however, the temporal relationship between interpretation and anxiety remains unclear as do the developmental origins of interpretative biases. This study set out to test a model of the development of interpretative biases in a prospective study of 110 children aged 5–9 years of age. Children and their parents were assessed three times, annually, on measures of anxiety and interpretation of ambiguous scenarios (including, for parents, both their own interpretations and their expectations regarding their child). Three models were constructed to assess associations between parent and child anxiety and threat and distress cognitions and expectancies. The three models were all a reasonable fit of the data, and supported conclusions that: (i) children’s threat and distress cognitions were stable over time and were significantly associated with anxiety, (ii) parents’ threat and distress cognitions and expectancies significantly predicted child threat cognitions at some time points, and (iii) parental anxiety significantly predicted parents cognitions, which predicted parental expectancies at some time points. Parental expectancies were also significantly predicted by child cognitions. The findings varied depending on assessment time point and whether threat or distress cognitions were being considered. The findings support the notion that child and parent cognitive processes, in particular parental expectations, may be a useful target in the treatment or prevention of anxiety disorders in children.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1991). Manual for the child behaviour checklist and profile. Burlington: University of Vermont.
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive processes in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy,5, 51–62. CrossRef
Chorpita, B. F., Albano, A. M., & Barlow, D. H. (1996). Cognitive processes in children: Relation to anxiety and family influence. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology,25, 170–176. CrossRef
Cole, D. A., Maxwell, S. E., & Martin, J. M. (1997). Reflected self-appraisals: Strength and structure of the relation of teacher, peer and parent ratings to children’s self-perceived competencies. Journal of Educational Psychology,89, 55–70. CrossRef
Creswell, C., Cooper, P., & Murray, L. (2010). Intergenerational transmissionof anxious information processing biases. In J. A. Hadwin & A. P. Field (Eds.), Information processing biases and anxiety: A developmental perspective (pp. 279–295). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossRef
Creswell, C., & O’Connor, T. G. (2006). ‘Anxious cognitions’ in children: An exploration of association and mediators. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,24, 761–766. CrossRef
Creswell, C., & O’Connor, T. G. (2010). Interpretation bias and anxiety in childhood: Stability, specificity and longitudinal associations. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy (in press).
Creswell, C., O’Connor, T. G., & Brewin, C. R. (2006). A longitudinal investigation of matrenal and child ‘anxious cognitions’. Cognitive Therapy and Research,30, 135–147. CrossRef
Eley, T. C., Bolton, D., O’Connor, T., Perrin, S., Smith, P., & Plomin, R. (2003). A twin study of anxiety-related behaviours in pre-school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,40, 945–960. CrossRef
Eley, T. C., & Zavos, H. M. S. (2010). Genetics. In J. A. Hadwin & A. P. Field (Eds.), Information processing biases and anxiety: A developmental perspective (pp. 209–232). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Field, A. P., & Lester, K. J. (2010). Learning of Information processing biases in anxious children and adolescents. In J. A. Hadwin & A. P. Field (Eds.), Information processing biases and anxiety: A developmental perspective (pp. 253–278). Chichester: Wiley. CrossRef
Gallagher, B., & Cartwright-Hatton, S. (2009). The relationship between parental anxiety and child-related cognition: An experimental approach. Cognitive Therapy and Research,33, 523–531. CrossRef
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,6, 1–55. CrossRef
James, A., Soler, A., & Weatherall, R. (2007). Cochrane review: Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Evidence-Based Child Health: A Cochrane Review Journal,2, 1248–1275. CrossRef
Lester, K. J., Field, A. P., & Muris, P. (2010a). Experimental modification of interpretation bias regarding social and animal fears in children (under review).
Muris, P. (2010). Anxiety-related reasoning biases in children and adolescents. In J. A. Hadwin & A. P. Field (Eds.), Information processing biases and anxiety: A developmental perspective (pp. 21–45). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). ‘John thinks that Mary thinks that’. Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5–10 year old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,39, 437–471. CrossRef
Reid, S. C., Salmon, K., & Lovibond, P. F. (2006). Cognitive biases in childhood anxiety, depression and aggression: Are they pervasive or specific? Cognitive Therapy and Research, 30, 531–549. CrossRef
Rubin, K. H., Cheah, C. S. L., & Fox, N. (2001). Emotion regulation, parenting and display of social reticence in preschoolers. Early Education and Development,12, 97–115. CrossRef
Spielberger, C. D. (1983). State-Trait anxiety inventory manual. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden.
Vasey, M. W., Crnic, K. A., & Carter, W. G. (1994). Worry in childhood: A developmental perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research,18, 529–549. CrossRef
Wheatcroft, R., & Creswell, C. (2007). Parental cognitions and expectations of their preschool children: The contribution of parental anxiety and child anxiety. British Journal of Developmental Psychology,25, 435–441. CrossRef
- Interpretation of Ambiguity in Children: A Prospective Study of Associations With Anxiety and Parental Interpretations
Andy P. Field
- Springer US