Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This study investigated aspects of individual differences in timing of continuous and discontinuous movements to different pacing signals (auditory or visual), pacing intervals (500, 650, 800, 950 ms), and across effectors (dominant versus non-dominant hand). Correlation and principal component analysis demonstrated that a single statistical dimension accounted for up to 60 % of the explained variance in discontinuous tasks and 25 % of the variance in continuous tasks, when applied to performance obtained from tasks conducted with different effectors and at different pacing rates. Correlation analysis of factor scores representing effector and rate independent task performances showed that timing of discrete or continuous movements can be associated with modality independent mechanisms. Timing variability from discrete and continuous trials was not significantly correlated. This study goes beyond previous correlational work on individual differences in discrete and continuous movements, demonstrating that individual differences in discrete (event-based) or continuous (emergent) motor timing tasks can be modeled as distinctive statistical components with dissimilar capability to capture effector, rate, and modality independent variance.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Avanzino, L., Bove, M., Tacchino, A., Ruggeri, P., Giannini, A., Trompetto, C., et al. (2009). Cerebellar involvement in timing accuracy of rhythmic finger movements in essential tremor. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 1971–1979. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06984.x.
Braitenberg, V. (1967). Is the cerebellar cortex a biological clock in the millisecond range? Progress in Brain Research, 25, 334–346. doi: 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60971-1.
Buonomano, D. V. (2000). Decoding temporal information: a model based on short-term synaptic plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(3), 1129–1141. PubMed
Distefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied researcher. Practical asessment, Ressearch & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.
Ivry, R. B., & Spencer, R. M. C. (2004). The neural representation of time. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14(2), 225–232, doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2004.03.013.
Ivry, R. B., Spencer, R. M., Zelaznik, H. N., & Diedrichsen, J. (2002). The cerebellum and event timing. Cerebellum: Recent Developments in Cerebellar Research, 978, 302–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb07576.x.
Lorås, H., Sigmundsson, H., Ohberg, F., & Stensdotter, A-K. (2013). Temporal control of discrete or rhythmical movements: the kinematic-difference hypothesis. (Submitted).
Mates, J. (1994). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. 1. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics, 70(5), 463–473. doi: 10.1007/Bf00203239.
Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11).
Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2002). Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1085–1099. doi: 10.1037//0096-1522.214.171.1245. PubMedCrossRef
Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, K. G., Spencer, R. M., Doffin, J. G., et al. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1316–1330. doi: 10.1037//0096-15126.96.36.1996. PubMedCrossRef
Spencer, R. M. C., Zelaznik, H. N., Diedrichsen, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science, 300(5624), 1437–1439. doi: 10.1126/science.1083661.
Studenka, B. E., Zelaznik, H. N., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2012). The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1086–1100. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.640404. CrossRef
Wiener, M., Turkeltaub, P., & Coslett, H. B. (2010). The image of time: a voxel-wise meta-analysis. Neuroimage, 49(2), 1728–1740. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.064.
Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M. C., Ivry, R. B., Baria, A., Bloom, M., Dolansky, L., et al. (2005). Timing variability in circle drawing and tapping: probing the relationship between event and emergent timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(5), 395–403. doi: 10.3200/Jmbr.37.5.395-403. PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
- Individual differences in timing of discrete and continuous movements: a dimensional approach
A. K. Stensdotter
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg