Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 2/2014

01-03-2014 | Original Article

Individual differences in timing of discrete and continuous movements: a dimensional approach

Auteurs: H. Lorås, A. K. Stensdotter, F. Öhberg, H. Sigmundsson

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2014

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

This study investigated aspects of individual differences in timing of continuous and discontinuous movements to different pacing signals (auditory or visual), pacing intervals (500, 650, 800, 950 ms), and across effectors (dominant versus non-dominant hand). Correlation and principal component analysis demonstrated that a single statistical dimension accounted for up to 60 % of the explained variance in discontinuous tasks and 25 % of the variance in continuous tasks, when applied to performance obtained from tasks conducted with different effectors and at different pacing rates. Correlation analysis of factor scores representing effector and rate independent task performances showed that timing of discrete or continuous movements can be associated with modality independent mechanisms. Timing variability from discrete and continuous trials was not significantly correlated. This study goes beyond previous correlational work on individual differences in discrete and continuous movements, demonstrating that individual differences in discrete (event-based) or continuous (emergent) motor timing tasks can be modeled as distinctive statistical components with dissimilar capability to capture effector, rate, and modality independent variance.
Literatuur
go back to reference Avanzino, L., Bove, M., Tacchino, A., Ruggeri, P., Giannini, A., Trompetto, C., et al. (2009). Cerebellar involvement in timing accuracy of rhythmic finger movements in essential tremor. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 1971–1979. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06984.x. Avanzino, L., Bove, M., Tacchino, A., Ruggeri, P., Giannini, A., Trompetto, C., et al. (2009). Cerebellar involvement in timing accuracy of rhythmic finger movements in essential tremor. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(10), 1971–1979. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1460-9568.​2009.​06984.​x.
go back to reference Buonomano, D. V. (2000). Decoding temporal information: a model based on short-term synaptic plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(3), 1129–1141.PubMed Buonomano, D. V. (2000). Decoding temporal information: a model based on short-term synaptic plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(3), 1129–1141.PubMed
go back to reference Distefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied researcher. Practical asessment, Ressearch & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11. Distefano, C., Zhu, M., & Mindrila, D. (2009). Understanding and using factor scores: considerations for the applied researcher. Practical asessment, Ressearch & Evaluation, 14(20), 1–11.
go back to reference Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Smith, A. (1992). Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial, and speech movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(3), 281–287.PubMedCrossRef Franz, E. A., Zelaznik, H. N., & Smith, A. (1992). Evidence of common timing processes in the control of manual, orofacial, and speech movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 24(3), 281–287.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1987a). On the performance and stability of human metronome-synchronization strategies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 40, 109–124.PubMedCrossRef Hary, D., & Moore, G. P. (1987a). On the performance and stability of human metronome-synchronization strategies. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 40, 109–124.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179–185.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations—evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 3–18. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.21.1.3.PubMedCrossRef Ivry, R. B., & Hazeltine, R. E. (1995). Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations—evidence for a common timing mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 21(1), 3–18. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​21.​1.​3.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Jantzen, K. J., Steinberg, F. L., & Kelso, J. A. (2004). Brain networks underlying human timing behavior are influenced by prior context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 101(17), 6815–6820. doi:10.1073/pnas.0401300101.CrossRef Jantzen, K. J., Steinberg, F. L., & Kelso, J. A. (2004). Brain networks underlying human timing behavior are influenced by prior context. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 101(17), 6815–6820. doi:10.​1073/​pnas.​0401300101.CrossRef
go back to reference Kay, B. A., Saltzman, E. L., Kelso, J. A. S., & Schoner, G. (1987). Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements—data and limit-cycle model. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 178–192. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.13.2.178.PubMedCrossRef Kay, B. A., Saltzman, E. L., Kelso, J. A. S., & Schoner, G. (1987). Space-time behavior of single and bimanual rhythmical movements—data and limit-cycle model. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 13(2), 178–192. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​13.​2.​178.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Keele, S. W., Ivry, R. I., & Pokorny, R. A. (1987). Force control and its relation to timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(1), 96–114.PubMedCrossRef Keele, S. W., Ivry, R. I., & Pokorny, R. A. (1987). Force control and its relation to timing. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(1), 96–114.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lorås, H., Sigmundsson, H., Ohberg, F., & Stensdotter, A-K. (2013). Temporal control of discrete or rhythmical movements: the kinematic-difference hypothesis. (Submitted). Lorås, H., Sigmundsson, H., Ohberg, F., & Stensdotter, A-K. (2013). Temporal control of discrete or rhythmical movements: the kinematic-difference hypothesis. (Submitted).
go back to reference Lorås, H., Sigmundsson, H., Talcott, J. B., Ohberg, F., & Stensdotter, A. K. (2012). Timing continuous or discontinuous movements across effectors specified by different pacing modalities and intervals. Experimental Brain Research, 220(3–4), 335–347. doi:10.1007/s00221-012-3142-4.PubMedCrossRef Lorås, H., Sigmundsson, H., Talcott, J. B., Ohberg, F., & Stensdotter, A. K. (2012). Timing continuous or discontinuous movements across effectors specified by different pacing modalities and intervals. Experimental Brain Research, 220(3–4), 335–347. doi:10.​1007/​s00221-012-3142-4.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Mates, J. (1994). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. 1. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics, 70(5), 463–473. doi:10.1007/Bf00203239. Mates, J. (1994). A model of synchronization of motor acts to a stimulus sequence. 1. Timing and error corrections. Biological Cybernetics, 70(5), 463–473. doi:10.​1007/​Bf00203239.
go back to reference Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97–113.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11). Osborne, J. W., Costello, A. B. (2004). Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(11).
go back to reference Repp, B. H. (2003). Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: the synchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(4), 355–370.PubMedCrossRef Repp, B. H. (2003). Rate limits in sensorimotor synchronization with auditory and visual sequences: the synchronization threshold and the benefits and costs of interval subdivision. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(4), 355–370.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2002). Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1085–1099. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.28.5.1085.PubMedCrossRef Repp, B. H., & Penel, A. (2002). Auditory dominance in temporal processing: new evidence from synchronization with simultaneous visual and auditory sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 28(5), 1085–1099. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​28.​5.​1085.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, K. G., Spencer, R. M., Doffin, J. G., et al. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1316–1330. doi:10.1037//0096-1523.25.5.1316.PubMedCrossRef Robertson, S. D., Zelaznik, H. N., Lantero, D. A., Bojczyk, K. G., Spencer, R. M., Doffin, J. G., et al. (1999). Correlations for timing consistency among tapping and drawing tasks: evidence against a single timing process for motor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 25(5), 1316–1330. doi:10.​1037/​/​0096-1523.​25.​5.​1316.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spencer, R. M. C., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2003). Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(4), 371–381.PubMedCrossRef Spencer, R. M. C., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2003). Weber (slope) analyses of timing variability in tapping and drawing tasks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(4), 371–381.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Spencer, R. M. C., Zelaznik, H. N., Diedrichsen, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science, 300(5624), 1437–1439. doi:10.1126/science.1083661. Spencer, R. M. C., Zelaznik, H. N., Diedrichsen, J., & Ivry, R. B. (2003). Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions. Science, 300(5624), 1437–1439. doi:10.​1126/​science.​1083661.
go back to reference Studenka, B. E., Zelaznik, H. N., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2012). The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1086–1100. doi:10.1080/17470218.2011.640404.CrossRef Studenka, B. E., Zelaznik, H. N., & Balasubramaniam, R. (2012). The distinction between tapping and circle drawing with and without tactile feedback: an examination of the sources of timing variance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(6), 1086–1100. doi:10.​1080/​17470218.​2011.​640404.CrossRef
go back to reference Torre, K., Balasubramaniam, R., Rheaume, N., Lemoine, L., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2011). Long-range correlation properties in motor timing are individual and task specific. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 339–346. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0049-1.CrossRef Torre, K., Balasubramaniam, R., Rheaume, N., Lemoine, L., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2011). Long-range correlation properties in motor timing are individual and task specific. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 339–346. doi:10.​3758/​s13423-011-0049-1.CrossRef
go back to reference Torre, K., & Delignieres, D. (2008). Distinct ways of timing movements in bimanual coordination tasks: contribution of serial correlation analysis and implications for modeling. Acta Psychol (Amst), 129(2), 284–296. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.08.003.CrossRef Torre, K., & Delignieres, D. (2008). Distinct ways of timing movements in bimanual coordination tasks: contribution of serial correlation analysis and implications for modeling. Acta Psychol (Amst), 129(2), 284–296. doi:10.​1016/​j.​actpsy.​2008.​08.​003.CrossRef
go back to reference Vorberg, D., & Schulze, H. H. (2002). Linear phase-correction in synchronization: predictions, parameter estimation, and simulations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46(1), 56–87. doi:10.1006/jmps.2001.1375.CrossRef Vorberg, D., & Schulze, H. H. (2002). Linear phase-correction in synchronization: predictions, parameter estimation, and simulations. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 46(1), 56–87. doi:10.​1006/​jmps.​2001.​1375.CrossRef
go back to reference Yeomans, K. A., & Golder, P. A. (1982). The Guttman-Kaiser criterion as a predictor of the number of common factors. Statistician, 31(3), 221–229. doi:10.2307/2987988.CrossRef Yeomans, K. A., & Golder, P. A. (1982). The Guttman-Kaiser criterion as a predictor of the number of common factors. Statistician, 31(3), 221–229. doi:10.​2307/​2987988.CrossRef
go back to reference Zelaznik, H. N., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1565–1575. doi:10.1037/A0020380.PubMedCrossRef Zelaznik, H. N., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2010). Timing processes are correlated when tasks share a salient event. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance, 36(6), 1565–1575. doi:10.​1037/​A0020380.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., & Doffin, J. G. (2000). Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(2), 193–199.PubMedCrossRef Zelaznik, H. N., Spencer, R. M., & Doffin, J. G. (2000). Temporal precision in tapping and circle drawing movements at preferred rates is not correlated: further evidence against timing as a general-purpose ability. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32(2), 193–199.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Individual differences in timing of discrete and continuous movements: a dimensional approach
Auteurs
H. Lorås
A. K. Stensdotter
F. Öhberg
H. Sigmundsson
Publicatiedatum
01-03-2014
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2014
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-013-0496-6

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2014

Psychological Research 2/2014 Naar de uitgave