Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 2/2021

24-08-2020

Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse U.S. Sample

Auteurs: Emily Graybill, Andrew Roach, Brian Barger

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 2/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a widely used mental health screening instrument developed in the United Kingdom that measures five proposed factors. U.S. research, however, historically supports a slightly different three-factor solution. The present study reports results using both principal factor analysis (PFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on data from multiple waves of an ongoing mental health project in middle school aged children. PFA analyses suggested three, five and six-factor solutions with substantial cross-loadings from items. CFAs showed alternative five and six-factor solutions fit well when items guided by the initial PFA were allowed to cross-load. Neither the original five-factor nor popular three-factor models fit well without allowing cross-loading items. These data suggest that popular SDQ three and five-factor model may have variable fit in certain U.S. populations.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
go back to reference Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1–13. Beavers, A. S., Lounsbury, J. W., Richards, J. K., Huck, S. W., Skolits, G. J., & Esquivel, S. L. (2013). Practical considerations for using exploratory factor analysis in educational research. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 18(6), 1–13.
go back to reference Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(2), ii17–ii24. Becker, A., Hagenberg, N., Roessner, V., Woerner, W., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Evaluation of the self-reported SDQ in a clinical setting: Do self-reports tell us more than ratings by adult informants? European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13(2), ii17–ii24.
go back to reference Becker, A., Steinhausen, H., Baldursson, G., Dalsgaard, S., Lorenzo, M., Ralston, S., Döpfner, M., Rothenberger, A., & Group, A. (2006). Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(Suppl.1), i56–i62s. PubMedCrossRef Becker, A., Steinhausen, H., Baldursson, G., Dalsgaard, S., Lorenzo, M., Ralston, S., Döpfner, M., Rothenberger, A., & Group, A. (2006). Psychopathological screening of children with ADHD: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a pan-European study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 15(Suppl.1), i56–i62s. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Caci, H., Morin, A. J., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(10), 1291–1301. CrossRef Caci, H., Morin, A. J., & Tran, A. (2015). Investigation of a bifactor model of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 24(10), 1291–1301. CrossRef
go back to reference Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. CrossRef Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. CrossRef
go back to reference Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1998). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6(1), 93–110. CrossRef Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (1998). Cross-cultural comparisons using non-invariant measurement items. Applied Behavioral Science Review, 6(1), 93–110. CrossRef
go back to reference Collett, B. R., Ohan, J. L., & Myers, K. M. (2003). Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: Scales assessing externalizing behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(10), 1143–1170. CrossRef Collett, B. R., Ohan, J. L., & Myers, K. M. (2003). Ten-year review of rating scales. VI: Scales assessing externalizing behaviors. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 42(10), 1143–1170. CrossRef
go back to reference Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7-15 Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10(1), 7-15
go back to reference Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A., & Hawes, D. (2005). Disentangling the underlying dimensions of psychopathy and conduct problems in childhood: A community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 400–410. PubMedCrossRef Dadds, M. R., Fraser, J., Frost, A., & Hawes, D. (2005). Disentangling the underlying dimensions of psychopathy and conduct problems in childhood: A community study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 400–410. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Dickey, W. C., & Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(9), 1159–1167. PubMedCrossRef Dickey, W. C., & Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 43(9), 1159–1167. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self-report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1. CrossRef Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self-report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1. CrossRef
go back to reference Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. CrossRef Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. CrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. PubMedCrossRef Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38(5), 581–586. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345. Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(11), 1337–1345.
go back to reference Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 534–539. PubMedCrossRef Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(6), 534–539. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 17–24. Goodman, R., & Scott, S. (1999). Comparing the strengths and difficulties questionnaire and the child behavior checklist: is small beautiful? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27(1), 17–24.
go back to reference He, J. P., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): The factor structure and scale validation in US adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(4), 583–595. PubMedCrossRef He, J. P., Burstein, M., Schmitz, A., & Merikangas, K. R. (2013). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): The factor structure and scale validation in US adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41(4), 583–595. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. CrossRef Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3), 393–416. CrossRef
go back to reference Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153–166. CrossRef Holgado-Tello, F. P., Chacón-Moscoso, S., Barbero-García, I., & Vila-Abad, E. (2010). Polychoric versus Pearson correlations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of ordinal variables. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 153–166. CrossRef
go back to reference Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683. CrossRef Hurley, A. E., Scandura, T. A., Schriesheim, C. A., Brannick, M. T., Seers, A., Vandenberg, R. J., & Williams, L. J. (1997). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Guidelines, issues, and alternatives. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 667–683. CrossRef
go back to reference Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr., J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. PubMedCrossRef Jackson, D. L., Gillaspy Jr., J. A., & Purc-Stephenson, R. (2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14(1), 6–23. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The applications of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. CrossRef Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The applications of electronic computer to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141–151. CrossRef
go back to reference Li, C. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. CrossRef Li, C. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. CrossRef
go back to reference Liu, S.-K., Chien, Y.-L., Shang, C.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Liu, Y.-C., & Gau, S. S.-F. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(6), 720–730s. PubMedCrossRef Liu, S.-K., Chien, Y.-L., Shang, C.-Y., Lin, C.-H., Liu, Y.-C., & Gau, S. S.-F. (2013). Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 54(6), 720–730s. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, Don'ts, and how-To's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. CrossRef Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do's, Don'ts, and how-To's. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. CrossRef
go back to reference Mieloo, C. L., Bevaart, F., Donker, M. C., van Oort, F. V., Raat, H., & Jansen, W. (2014). Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. European Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 26–32. PubMedCrossRef Mieloo, C. L., Bevaart, F., Donker, M. C., van Oort, F. V., Raat, H., & Jansen, W. (2014). Validation of the SDQ in a multi-ethnic population of young children. European Journal of Public Health, 24(1), 26–32. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). TComplex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological methodology, 267–316. Muthen, B. O., & Satorra, A. (1995). TComplex sample data in structural equation modeling. Sociological methodology, 267–316.
go back to reference Niclasen, J., Teasdale, T. W., Andersen, A. M. N., Skovgaard, A. M., Elberling, H., & Obel, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Danish strength and difficulties questionnaire: The SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts. PLoS One, 7(2), e32025. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Niclasen, J., Teasdale, T. W., Andersen, A. M. N., Skovgaard, A. M., Elberling, H., & Obel, C. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Danish strength and difficulties questionnaire: The SDQ assessed for more than 70,000 raters in four different cohorts. PLoS One, 7(2), e32025. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595. CrossRef Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., & Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7(4), 557–595. CrossRef
go back to reference Paalman, C. H., Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., & Jansen, L. M. (2013). Instruments measuring externalizing mental health problems in immigrant ethnic minority youths: A systematic review of measurement properties. PLoS One, 8(5), e63109. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Paalman, C. H., Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., & Jansen, L. M. (2013). Instruments measuring externalizing mental health problems in immigrant ethnic minority youths: A systematic review of measurement properties. PLoS One, 8(5), e63109. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Palmieri, P. A., & Smith, G. C. (2007). Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a U.S. sample of custodial grandmothers. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 189–198. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Palmieri, P. A., & Smith, G. C. (2007). Examining the structural validity of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in a U.S. sample of custodial grandmothers. Psychological Assessment, 19(2), 189–198. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Perera, S., Thalagala, E., Chandrarathna, S. H., Agampodi, T. C., Nugegoda, D. B., & Agampodi, S. B. (2013). Factor structure and normative data of the Sinhalese version of self-reported strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for adolescents. Ceylon Medical Journal,of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 634–659. Perera, S., Thalagala, E., Chandrarathna, S. H., Agampodi, T. C., Nugegoda, D. B., & Agampodi, S. B. (2013). Factor structure and normative data of the Sinhalese version of self-reported strength and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) for adolescents. Ceylon Medical Journal,of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(6), 634–659.
go back to reference Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287. PubMedCrossRef Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychological Assessment, 12(3), 287. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Richter, J., Sagatun, A., Heyerdahl, S., Oppedal, B., & Rotsamb, E. (2011). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - self report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(9), 1002–1011. PubMedCrossRef Richter, J., Sagatun, A., Heyerdahl, S., Oppedal, B., & Rotsamb, E. (2011). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - self report. An analysis of its structure in a multiethnic urban adolescent sample. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 52(9), 1002–1011. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., ... & Rosseel, M. Y. (2017). Package ‘lavaan’. Retrieved June, 17, 2017. Rosseel, Y., Oberski, D., Byrnes, J., Vanbrabant, L., Savalei, V., Merkle, E., ... & Rosseel, M. Y. (2017). Package ‘lavaan’. Retrieved June, 17, 2017.
go back to reference Rothenberger, A., Becker, A., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Group Bs. (2008). Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: Results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(Suppl.1), 99–105. PubMedCrossRef Rothenberger, A., Becker, A., Erhart, M., Wille, N., Ravens-Sieberer, U., & Group Bs. (2008). Psychometric properties of the parent strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the general population of German children and adolescents: Results of the BELLA study. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 17(Suppl.1), 99–105. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Ruchkin, V., Jones, S., Vermeiren, R., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2008). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: The self-report version in American urban and suburban youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 175–182. PubMedCrossRef Ruchkin, V., Jones, S., Vermeiren, R., & Schwab-Stone, M. (2008). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: The self-report version in American urban and suburban youth. Psychological Assessment, 20(2), 175–182. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. CrossRef Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. CrossRef
go back to reference Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(3), 254–274. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4-to 12-year-olds: A review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13(3), 254–274. PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
go back to reference Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
go back to reference Tobia, V., Grabriele, M. A., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2013). The Italian version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - teacher. Psychometric properties. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(5), 493–505. CrossRef Tobia, V., Grabriele, M. A., & Marzocchi, G. M. (2013). The Italian version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) - teacher. Psychometric properties. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31(5), 493–505. CrossRef
go back to reference Toh, T. H., Chow, S. J., Ting, T. H., & Sewell, J. (2008). Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1. CrossRef Toh, T. H., Chow, S. J., Ting, T. H., & Sewell, J. (2008). Chinese translation of strengths and difficulties questionnaire requires urgent review before field trials for validity and reliability. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2(1), 1. CrossRef
go back to reference Tuszynski, J., & Tuszynski, M. J. (2007). The caTools package. R package version, 1–8. Tuszynski, J., & Tuszynski, M. J. (2007). The caTools package. R package version, 1–8.
go back to reference van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goedhart, A. W., de Wilde, E. J., & Treffers, P. D. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: How important are method effects and minor factors? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 127–144. CrossRef van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goedhart, A. W., de Wilde, E. J., & Treffers, P. D. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: How important are method effects and minor factors? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50(2), 127–144. CrossRef
go back to reference Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 189–197. CrossRef Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., & Braet, C. (2006). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22(3), 189–197. CrossRef
go back to reference Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M., & Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early-, and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(12), 1304–1312. PubMedCrossRef Van Roy, B., Veenstra, M., & Clench-Aas, J. (2008). Construct validity of the five-factor strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) in pre-, early-, and late adolescence. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(12), 1304–1312. PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vugteveen, J., De Bildt, A., Hartman, C. A., & Timmerman, M. E. (2018). Using the Dutch multi-informant strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to predict adolescent psychiatric diagnoses. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(10), 1347–1359. CrossRef Vugteveen, J., De Bildt, A., Hartman, C. A., & Timmerman, M. E. (2018). Using the Dutch multi-informant strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to predict adolescent psychiatric diagnoses. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 27(10), 1347–1359. CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Factor Structure of the Self-Report Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire in a Diverse U.S. Sample
Auteurs
Emily Graybill
Andrew Roach
Brian Barger
Publicatiedatum
24-08-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 2/2021
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-020-09833-4