Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-11-2022

Exploring motivation to quit and risk appraisals of hookah tobacco smoking for self and partner among a member of single and dual smoker couples

Auteurs: Isaac M. Lipkus, Darren Mays, Camilla Sanders, Daniel Hatch

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine | Uitgave 3/2023

Abstract

Negative health effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) are likely more pronounced in dual rather than single smoker couples. Data on how smokers’ perceived harms for self and partner differ between couple types and how these perceptions are associated with motivation to quit are needed. We examined these associations by surveying one member of dual smoker (i.e., both partners smoke) and single smoker (i.e., one partner smokes) couples who engages in WTS. We enrolled online adults ages 18–32 who engaged in WTS during the last month and were in a committed relationship of at least six months. Participants rated their harm to self and, when relevant, to partner, how much they were harming their partner due to their WTS, and partner’s smoke exposure. Participants reported their motivation to quit. Of the 323 participants, 215 (67%) were in dual smoker couples. Participants in dual smoker couples reported lower own perceived risk, which correlated highly with perceived partner risk, than participants in single smoker couples; they also reported harming their partners more even though they downplayed how frequency of smoke exposure was harming the partner. Motivation to quit did not differ by couple type. Across couple types, motivation to quit increased with greater perceived harms. Smokers in dual compared to single smoker couples downplay their risks and perceived harms their smoking causes their partner. Interventions focused on harms to self and partner may be effective to increase motivation to quit and cessation in both couple types.

vorige artikel Adolescent girls’ cardiovascular responses to peer rejection: exploring the impact of early life stress

volgende artikel Associations between social COVID-19 exposure and psychological functioning

Akl, E. A., Gaddam, S., Gunukula, S. K., Honeine, R., Jaoude, P. A., & Irani, J. (2010). The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: A systematic review. International Journal of Epidemiology, 39 834–857. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq002CrossRefPubMed

Abudayyeh, H. S., Glasser, A. M., Johnson, A. L., Cohn, A. M., Wagener, T. L., Mays, D., & Villanti, A. C. (2018). Social and substance use correlates of adult hookah use, 2016. Addictive Behaviors, 79, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.12.011CrossRefPubMed

Adetona, O., Mok, S., Rajczyk, J., Brinkman, M. C., & Ferketich, A. K. (2021). The adverse health effects of waterpipe smoking in adolescents and young adults: A narrative review. Tobacco Induced Diseases, 19, 81. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/142521CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Akl, E. A., Ward, K. D., Bteddini, D., Khaliel, R., Alexander, A. C., Lotfi, T., & Afifi, R. A. (2015). The allure of the waterpipe: A narrative review of factors affecting the epidemic rise in waterpipe smoking among young persons globally. Tobacco Control, 24, i13–i21. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051906CrossRefPubMed

Al Rashidi, M., Shihadeh, A., & Saliba, N. A. (2008). Volatile aldehydes in the mainstream smoke of the narghile waterpipe. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46, 3546–3549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.09.007CrossRefPubMed

Berli, C., Ochsner, S., Stadler, G., Knoll, N., Hornung, R., & Scholz, U. (2015). Volitional processes and daily smoking: Examining inter- and intraindividual associations around a quit attempt. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 38, 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-014-9598-xCrossRefPubMed

Britton, M., Haddad, S., & Derrick, J. L. (2019). Perceived partner responsiveness predicts smoking cessation in single-smoker couples. Addictive Behaviors, 88, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.026CrossRefPubMed

Falba, T. A., & Sindelar, J. L. (2008). Spousal concordance in health behavior change. Health Services Research, 43, 96–116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00754.xCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Harris, P. R., Mayle, K., Mabbott, L., & Napper, L. (2007). Self-affirmation reduces smokers’ defensiveness to graphic on-pack cigarette warning labels. Health Psychology, 26, 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.4.437CrossRefPubMed

Heinz, A. J., Giedgowd, G. E., Crane, N. A., Veilleux, J. C., Conrad, M., Braun, A. R., & Kassel, J. D. (2013). A comprehensive examination of hookah smoking in college students: Use patterns and contexts, social norms and attitudes, harm perception, psychological correlates and co-occurring substance use. Addictive Behaviors, 38, 2751–2760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.009CrossRefPubMed

Horowitz, J., M., Graf, N., & Livingston, G. (2019). Marriage and Cohabitation in the US. Pew Research Center, 53. Retrieved on July 11, 2022 from https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2019/11/PSDT_11.06.19_marriage_cohabitation_FULL.final.pdf

Hummel, K., Brown, J., Willemsen, M. C., West, R., & Kotz, D. (2017). External validation of the motivation to stop Scale (MTSS): Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Netherlands survey. European Journal of Public Health, 27, 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckw105CrossRefPubMed

Hummel, K., Candel, M., Nagelhout, G. E., Brown, J., van den Putte, B., Kotz, D., & de Vries, H. (2018). Construct and predictive validity of three measures of intention to quit smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands survey. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 20, 1101–1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx092CrossRefPubMed

Jackson, S. E., Steptoe, A., & Wardle, J. (2015). The influence of partner’s behavior on health behavior change: The english longitudinal study of ageing. JAMA Internal Medicine, 175, 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.7554CrossRefPubMed

Janz, N., & Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: a decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1–47.CrossRefPubMed

Jeong, M., Zhang, D., Morgan, J. C., Ross, J. C., Osman, A., Boynton, M. H., & Brewer, N. T. (2019). Similarities and differences in tobacco control research findings from convenience and probability samples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53 476–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay059CrossRefPubMed

Kotz, D., Brown, J., & West, R. (2013). Predictive validity of the motivation to stop scale (MTSS): A single-item measure of motivation to stop smoking. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 128, 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.07.012CrossRefPubMed

Kumar, S. R., Davies, S., Weitzman, M., & Sherman, S. (2015). A review of air quality, biological indicators and health effects of second-hand waterpipe smoke exposure. Tobacco Control, 24, i54–i59. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052038CrossRefPubMed

Katzenelenbogen, O., Knoll, N., Stadler, G., & Bar-Kalifa, E. (2022). The role of individual and dyadic planning in couples’ daily goal pursuits. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167221997630CrossRefPubMed

Kraemer, J. D., Strasser, A. A., Lindblom, E. N., Niaura, R. S., & Mays, D. (2017). Crowdsourced data collection for public health: A comparison with nationally representative, population tobacco use data. Preventive Medicine, 102, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.006CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480CrossRefPubMed

Lewis, M. A., McBride, C. M., Pollak, K. I., Puleo, E., Butterfield, R. M., & Emmons, K. M. (2006). Understanding health behavior change among couples: An interdependence and communal coping approach. Social Science and Medicine, 62, 1369–1380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.006CrossRefPubMed

Li, L., Borland, R., Fong, G. T., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., Wang, L., & Thrasher, J. F. (2015). Smoking-related thoughts and microbehaviours, and their predictive power for quitting. Tobacco Control, 24, 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051384CrossRefPubMed

Lipkus, I. M., Mays, D., & Tercyak, K. P. (2017). Characterizing young adults’ susceptibility to waterpipe tobacco use and their reactions to messages about product harms and addictiveness. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 19, 1216–1223. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw251CrossRefPubMed

Lipkus, I. M., Sanders, C., & Mays, D. (2022). Influencing perceptions of harm of waterpipe tobacco smoking among one member of couples who use waterpipe. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 24, 1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntab261CrossRefPubMed

Litman, L., & Robinson, J. (2020). Data representativeness of online samples. In: L. Litman & J. Robinson (Eds), Conducting Online Research on Amazon Mechanical Turk and Beyond , pp. 173–197. Sage Academic Publishing. Thousand Oaks: CA: SAGE Publications

Lopez, A. A., Eissenberg, T., Jaafar, M., & Afifi, R. (2017). Now is the time to advocate for interventions designed specifically to prevent and control waterpipe tobacco smoking. Addictive Behaviors, 66, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2016.11.008CrossRefPubMed

Lüscher, J., Hohl, D. H., Knoll, N., & Scholz, U. (2019). Invisible social support and invisible social control in dual-smoker couple’s everyday life: A dyadic perspective. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kay062CrossRefPubMed

Lüscher, J., & Scholz, U. (2017). Does social support predict smoking abstinence in dual-smoker couples? Evidence from a dyadic approach. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 30, 273–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1270448CrossRefPubMed

Lyons, R. F., Mickelson, K. D., Sullivan, M. J. L., & Coyne, J. C. (1998). Coping as a communal process. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 579–605. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598155001CrossRef

Mays, D., Tercyak, K. P., & Lipkus, I. M. (2016). The effects of brief waterpipe tobacco use harm and addiction education messages among young adult waterpipe tobacco users. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 18, 777–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv223CrossRefPubMed

Oakes, W., Chapman, S., Borland, R., Balmford, J., & Trotter, L. (2004). “Bulletproof skeptics in life’s jungle”: Which self-exempting beliefs about smoking most predict lack of progression towards quitting? Preventive Medicine, 39, 776–782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.001CrossRefPubMed

Primack, B. A., Carroll, M. V., Weiss, P. M., Shihadeh, A. L., Shensa, A., Farley, S. T., Fine, M. J., Eissenberg, T., & Nayak, S. (2016). Systematic review and meta-analysis of inhaled toxicants from waterpipe and cigarette smoking. Public Health Reports, 131, 76–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491613100114CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Raad, D., Gaddam, S., Schunemann, H. J., Irani, J., Abou Jaoude, P., Honeine, R., & Akl, E. A. (2011). Effects of water-pipe smoking on lung function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest, 139, 764–774. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0991CrossRefPubMed

Ranby, K. W., Lewis, M. A., Toll, B. A., Rohrbaugh, M. J., & Lipkus, I. M. (2013). Perceptions of smoking-related risk and worry among dual-smoker couples. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 15, 734–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts210CrossRefPubMed

Ramôa, C. P., Shihadeh, A., Salman, R., & Eissenberg, T. (2016). Group waterpipe tobacco smoking increases smoke toxicant concentration. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 18, 770–776. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv271CrossRefPubMed

Roberts, M. E., Banse, R., Ebbeler, C., & Ferketich, A. K. (2017). Spousal concordance in the use of alternative tobacco products: A multi-country investigation. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 171, 16–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.11.017CrossRefPubMed

Robinson, J. N., Wang, B., Jackson, K. J., Donaldson, E. A., & Ryant, C. A. (2018). Characteristics of hookah tobacco smoking sessions and correlates of use frequency among US adults: Findings from Wave 1 of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 20, 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx060CrossRefPubMed

Salloum, R. G., Thrasher, J. F., Getz, K. R., Barnett, T. E., Asfar, T., & Maziak, W. (2017). Patterns of waterpipe tobacco smoking among US young adults, 2013–2014. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52, 507–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.015CrossRefPubMed

Scholz, U., Stadler, G., Berli, C., Lüscher, J., & Knoll, N. (2020). How do people experience and respond to social control from their partner? Three daily diary studies. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 613546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613546CrossRefPubMed

Schwarzer, R., & Luszczynska, A. (2015). Health action process approach. In M. Conner & P. Norman (Eds.), Predicting Health Behaviours (3rd Ed. pp. 252-278). Maidenhead: McGraw Hill Open University Press.

Sepetdjian, E., Shihadeh, A., & Saliba, N. A. (2008). Measurement of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in narghile waterpipe tobacco smoke. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 46, 1582–1590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2007.12.028CrossRefPubMed

Sheeran, P., Harris, P. R., & Epton, T. (2014). Does heightening risk appraisals change people’s intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033065CrossRefPubMed

Shoham, V., Butler, E. A., Rohrbaugh, M. J., & Trost, S. E. (2007). Symptom-system fit in couples: Emotion regulation when one or both partners smoke. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 116, 848–853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.848CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Strulovici-Barel, Y., Shaykhiev, R., Salit, J., Deeb, R. S., Krause, A., Kaner, R. J., & Crystal, R. G. (2016). Pulmonary abnormalities in young, light-use waterpipe (hookah) smokers. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 194, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201512-2470OCCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

United States Census Bureau. (2021). Census Bureau releases new estimates on america’s families and living arrangements. (RELEASE NUMBER CB21-TPS.138), 1. Retrieved on July 11, 2022 from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2021/families-and-living-arrangements.html

United States Department of Health and Human Services, N. I. o. H., National Institute on Drug Abuse, and United States Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Tobacco Products,. (2021). Past 30-Day Use of Hookah Among Young Adults (Aged 18–24), by Sociodemographics(pp. 13). Retrieved on July 26, 2022 from https://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/NAHDAP/pathstudy/YoungAdult-30Day-Hookah.pdf

Waziry, R., Jawad, M., Ballout, R. A., Al Akel, M., & Akl, E. A. (2017). The effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking on health outcomes: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Internal Journal of Epidemiology, 46, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw021CrossRef

Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329–349 CrossRef

Titel: Exploring motivation to quit and risk appraisals of hookah tobacco smoking for self and partner among a member of single and dual smoker couples
Auteurs: Isaac M. Lipkus
Darren Mays
Camilla Sanders
Daniel Hatch
Publicatiedatum: 01-11-2022
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Behavioral Medicine / Uitgave 3/2023
Print ISSN: 0160-7715
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3521
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00369-4

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2023

The role of childhood unpredictability in adult health

Results of an African American-targeted norm-based colorectal cancer screening intervention: a pilot study

Factors associated with HPV vaccination decision-making among Korean American women

Sleep and fatigue among youth with sickle cell disease: A daily diary study

Developing skin cancer education materials for darker skin populations: crowdsourced design, message targeting, and acral lentiginous melanoma

Examining the role of experiential avoidance and valued action in the negative effects of weight self-stigma