Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

14-09-2015 | Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only) | Uitgave 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016

Evaluating a new methodology for providing individualized feedback in healthcare on quality of life and its importance, using the WHOQOL-BREF in a community population

Tijdschrift:
Quality of Life Research > Uitgave 3/2016
Auteurs:
Alison M. Llewellyn, Suzanne M. Skevington
Belangrijke opmerkingen
This research was conducted by the authors at the WHO Centre for the Study of Quality of Life, Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY UK.

Abstract

Purpose

We conducted an evaluation to find out how a novel quality of life (QoL) intervention containing guided individualized feedback was appraised. The importance of QoL was matched with QoL assessment for each subjective dimension, using graphical feedback. We examined whether this information was acceptable, feasible and valued beyond the clinical context, among the community.

Methods

Using a mixed-methods cross-sectional design, the intervention was piloted with 129 participants from communities and registered in primary care. WHOQOL-BREF and WHOQOL Importance scores were graphically matched by dimension. Results were inspected and interpreted with directed guidance to identify good and poor QoL. We report the post-intervention evaluation of feedback, including qualitative themes. Follow-up interviews among those expecting feedback to be helpful explored potential self-management and healthcare uses.

Results

After feedback, 65 % reported changes in thoughts and perceptions of QoL, often describing insights as self-affirming. Goals or expectations changed for 34 %, and motivation to change was reported. Over 50 % evaluated the feedback as helpful in the short term or for the future. Follow-up interviews endorsed the value of the feedback and its usefulness in sharing with a healthcare professional (92 %), suggesting it would facilitate professionals’ understandings of patients and enable health advice to be targeted.

Conclusions

The benefits of using this novel feedback can be extended to the general population, as directed guidance aids interpretation, thereby saving health service costs. This complex pilot intervention needs testing in a blinded fully randomized controlled trial. Beyond independent self-management, graphs could be used during clinical decision-making.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2016

Quality of Life Research 3/2016 Naar de uitgave

Special Section: PROs in Non-Standard Settings (by invitation only)

Use of weekly assessment data to enhance evaluation of a subjective wellbeing intervention