Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2015

01-07-2015

Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice

Auteurs: Maria J. Santana, Lotte Haverman, Kate Absolom, Elena Takeuchi, David Feeny, Martha Grootenhuis, Galina Velikova

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2015

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Introduction

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) were originally developed for comparing groups of people in clinical trials and population studies, and the results were used to support treatment recommendations or inform health policy, but there was not direct benefit for the participants providing PROs data. However, as the experience in using those measures increased, it became obvious the clinical value in using individual patient PROs profiles in daily practice to identify/monitor symptoms, evaluate treatment outcomes and support shared decision-making. A key issue limiting successful implementation is clinicians’ lack of knowledge on how to effectively utilize PROs data in their clinical encounters.

Methods

Using a change management theoretical framework, this paper describes the development and implementation of three programs for training clinicians to effectively use PRO data in routine practice. The training programs are in three diverse clinical areas (adult oncology, lung transplant and paediatrics), in three countries with different healthcare systems, thus providing a rare opportunity to pull out common approaches whilst recognizing specific settings. For each program, we describe the clinical and organizational setting, the program planning and development, the content of the training session with supporting material, subsequent monitoring of PROs use and evidence of adoption. The common successful components and practical steps are identified, leading to discussion and future recommendations.

Results

The results of the three training programs are described as the implementation. In the oncology program, PRO data have been developed and are currently evaluated; in the lung transplant program, PRO data are used in daily practice and the integration with electronic patient records is under development; and in the paediatric program, PRO data are fully implemented with around 7,600 consultations since the start of the implementation.

Conclusion

Adult learning programs teaching clinicians how to use and act on PROs in clinical practice are a key steps in supporting patient engagement and participation in shared decision-making. Researchers and clinicians from different clinical areas should collaborate to share ideas, develop guidelines and promote good practice in patient-centred care.
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2014) Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2014) Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims.
2.
go back to reference Jensen, R. E., Snyder, C. F., Abernethy, A. P., et al. (2013). Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. Journal of Oncology Practice, 10, 215–222. Jensen, R. E., Snyder, C. F., Abernethy, A. P., et al. (2013). Review of electronic patient-reported outcomes systems used in cancer clinical care. Journal of Oncology Practice, 10, 215–222.
3.
go back to reference Wu, A. W., Kharrazi, H., Boulware, L. E., & Snyder, C. F. (2013). Measure once, cut twice—Adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. Journal Clinical Epidemiology, 66, S12–S20.CrossRef Wu, A. W., Kharrazi, H., Boulware, L. E., & Snyder, C. F. (2013). Measure once, cut twice—Adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research. Journal Clinical Epidemiology, 66, S12–S20.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50, 1060–1070.PubMedCrossRef Ahmed, S., Berzon, R. A., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50, 1060–1070.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51, S73–S79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Snyder, C. F., Jensen, R. E., Segal, J. B., & Wu, A. W. (2013). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs): putting the patient perspective in patient-centered outcomes research. Medical Care, 51, S73–S79.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Banerjee, A. K., Okun, S., Edwards, I. R., et al. (2013). Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Safety, 36, 1129–1149.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Banerjee, A. K., Okun, S., Edwards, I. R., et al. (2013). Patient-reported outcome measures in safety event reporting: PROSPER consortium guidance. Drug Safety, 36, 1129–1149.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Deyo, R. A., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Medical Care, 27, S254–S268.PubMedCrossRef Deyo, R. A., & Patrick, D. L. (1989). Barriers to the use of health status measures in clinical investigation, patient care, and policy research. Medical Care, 27, S254–S268.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 508–518.CrossRef Boyce, M. B., Browne, J. P., & Greenhalgh, J. (2014). The experiences of professionals with using information from patient-reported outcome measures to improve the quality of healthcare: A systematic review of qualitative research. BMJ Quality & Safety, 23, 508–518.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal Evaluation Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416.CrossRef Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal Evaluation Clinical Practice, 5, 401–416.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., et al. (2010). Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Quality Life Research, 19, 371–379.CrossRef Santana, M. J., Feeny, D., Johnson, J. A., et al. (2010). Assessing the use of health-related quality of life measures in the routine clinical care of lung-transplant patients. Quality Life Research, 19, 371–379.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Engelen, V., Detmar, S., Koopman, H., et al. (2012). Reporting health-related quality of life scores to physicians during routine follow-up visits of pediatric oncology patients: is it effective? Pediatric Blood Cancer, 58, 766–774.PubMedCrossRef Engelen, V., Detmar, S., Koopman, H., et al. (2012). Reporting health-related quality of life scores to physicians during routine follow-up visits of pediatric oncology patients: is it effective? Pediatric Blood Cancer, 58, 766–774.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Abhyankar, P., McCluskey, S., Takeuchi, E., & Velikova, G. (2013). How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations? Quality Life Research, 22, 939–950.CrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Abhyankar, P., McCluskey, S., Takeuchi, E., & Velikova, G. (2013). How do doctors refer to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMS) in oncology consultations? Quality Life Research, 22, 939–950.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Sheppard, S., Campbell, L., Smith, A., Awad, N., Selby, P., & Brown, J. (2008). Randomized trial of quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice: Do oncologists need to know. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 15S. Velikova, G., Sheppard, S., Campbell, L., Smith, A., Awad, N., Selby, P., & Brown, J. (2008). Randomized trial of quality-of-life measurement in oncology practice: Do oncologists need to know. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 26, 15S.
14.
15.
go back to reference Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., & Paulussen, T. (2004). Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: Literature review and Delphi study. International Journal Quality Health Care, 16, 107–123.CrossRef Fleuren, M., Wiefferink, K., & Paulussen, T. (2004). Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: Literature review and Delphi study. International Journal Quality Health Care, 16, 107–123.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Awad, N., Coles-Gale, R., Wright, E. P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2008). The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice—A qualitative study of patient and physician views. Psychooncology, 17, 690–698.PubMedCrossRef Velikova, G., Awad, N., Coles-Gale, R., Wright, E. P., Brown, J. M., & Selby, P. J. (2008). The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice—A qualitative study of patient and physician views. Psychooncology, 17, 690–698.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724.CrossRef Velikova, G., Booth, L., Smith, A. B., et al. (2004). Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. Journal Clinical Oncology, 22, 714–724.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Wright, P., Marshall, L., Smith, A. B., Velikova, G., & Selby, P. (2008). Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI). European Journal Cancer, 44, 1529–1535.CrossRef Wright, P., Marshall, L., Smith, A. B., Velikova, G., & Selby, P. (2008). Measurement and interpretation of social distress using the social difficulties inventory (SDI). European Journal Cancer, 44, 1529–1535.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing. Knowles, M. (1978). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
21.
go back to reference Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become (pp. 114, 199–217). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill. Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become (pp. 114, 199–217). Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.
22.
go back to reference Holch, P., Absolom, K., & Velikova, G. (2014). Development and preliminary evaluation of guidelines for emotional distress management in oncology practise. Psychooncology, 23(suppl. 2), 13. Holch, P., Absolom, K., & Velikova, G. (2014). Development and preliminary evaluation of guidelines for emotional distress management in oncology practise. Psychooncology, 23(suppl. 2), 13.
23.
go back to reference Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Warrington, L., et al. (2014). Using a patient reported outcome measure in chemotherapy review consultations: The impact of an interactive doctor training session. Quality of Life Research (Submitted). Absolom, K., Takeuchi, E., Warrington, L., et al. (2014). Using a patient reported outcome measure in chemotherapy review consultations: The impact of an interactive doctor training session. Quality of Life Research (Submitted).
24.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2013). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality Life Research, 9(3), 371–379. Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. (2013). Framework to assess the effects of using patient-reported outcome measures in chronic care management. Quality Life Research, 9(3), 371–379.
25.
go back to reference Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. H. (2009). Using the health utilities index in routine clinical care: Process, feasibility, and acceptability: A randomized controlled trial. Patient, 2, 159–167.PubMedCrossRef Santana, M. J., & Feeny, D. H. (2009). Using the health utilities index in routine clinical care: Process, feasibility, and acceptability: A randomized controlled trial. Patient, 2, 159–167.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Haverman, L., & Engelen, V. (2011). Van Rossum MA, Heymans HS, Grootenhuis MA (2011) Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: Development of an innovative web-based application. BMC Pediatrics, 11, 3–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Haverman, L., & Engelen, V. (2011). Van Rossum MA, Heymans HS, Grootenhuis MA (2011) Monitoring health-related quality of life in paediatric practice: Development of an innovative web-based application. BMC Pediatrics, 11, 3–10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Leaf, P. J., Owens, P. L., Leventhal, J. M., et al. (2004). Pediatricians’ training and identification and management of psychosocial problems. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 43, 355–365.CrossRef Leaf, P. J., Owens, P. L., Leventhal, J. M., et al. (2004). Pediatricians’ training and identification and management of psychosocial problems. Clinical Pediatrics (Phila), 43, 355–365.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baars, R. M., van der Pal, S. M., Koopman, H. M., & Wit, J. M. (2004). Clinicians’ perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica, 93, 1356–1362.PubMedCrossRef Baars, R. M., van der Pal, S. M., Koopman, H. M., & Wit, J. M. (2004). Clinicians’ perspective on quality of life assessment in paediatric clinical practice. Acta Paediatrica, 93, 1356–1362.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Engelen, V., Haverman, L., Koopman, H., et al. (2010). Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, 235–244.PubMedCrossRef Engelen, V., Haverman, L., Koopman, H., et al. (2010). Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice. Patient Education and Counseling, 81, 235–244.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Wallander, J. L., & Varni, J. W. (1998). Effects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. Journal Child Psychology Psychiatry, 39, 29–46.CrossRef Wallander, J. L., & Varni, J. W. (1998). Effects of pediatric chronic physical disorders on child and family adjustment. Journal Child Psychology Psychiatry, 39, 29–46.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Stam, H., Grootenhuis, M. A., Brons, P. P., Caron, H. N., & Last, B. F. (2006). Health-related quality of life in children and emotional reactions of parents following completion of cancer treatment. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 47, 312–319.PubMedCrossRef Stam, H., Grootenhuis, M. A., Brons, P. P., Caron, H. N., & Last, B. F. (2006). Health-related quality of life in children and emotional reactions of parents following completion of cancer treatment. Pediatric Blood Cancer, 47, 312–319.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Lane, M. M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 3, 34.CrossRef Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Lane, M. M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health Quality Life Outcomes, 3, 34.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288, 3027–3034.PubMedCrossRef Detmar, S. B., Muller, M. J., Schornagel, J. H., Wever, L. D., & Aaronson, N. K. (2002). Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 288, 3027–3034.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality Life Research, 21, 1305–1314.CrossRef Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., et al. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality Life Research, 21, 1305–1314.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: Lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science and Medicine, 60, 833–843.PubMedCrossRef Greenhalgh, J., Long, A. F., & Flynn, R. (2005). The use of patient reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice: Lack of impact or lack of theory? Social Science and Medicine, 60, 833–843.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Judson, T. J., Bennett, A. V., Rogak, L. J., et al. (2013). Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. Journal Clinical Oncology, 31, 2580–2585.CrossRef Judson, T. J., Bennett, A. V., Rogak, L. J., et al. (2013). Feasibility of long-term patient self-reporting of toxicities from home via the Internet during routine chemotherapy. Journal Clinical Oncology, 31, 2580–2585.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Training clinicians in how to use patient-reported outcome measures in routine clinical practice
Auteurs
Maria J. Santana
Lotte Haverman
Kate Absolom
Elena Takeuchi
David Feeny
Martha Grootenhuis
Galina Velikova
Publicatiedatum
01-07-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2015
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-014-0903-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2015

Quality of Life Research 7/2015 Naar de uitgave