Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

Open Access 18-04-2020 | Original Article

Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training

Auteurs: Katrina Sabah, Thomas Dolk, Nachshon Meiran, Gesine Dreisbach

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Content variability was previously suggested to promote stronger learning effects in cognitive training whereas less variability incurred transfer costs (Sabah et al. Psychological Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Here, we expanded these findings by additionally examining the role of learners’ control in short-term task-switching training by comparing voluntary task-switching to a yoked control forced task-switching condition. To this end, four training conditions were compared: (1) forced fixed content, (2) voluntary fixed content, (3) forced varied content, and (3) voluntary varied content. To further enhance task demands, bivalent stimuli were used during training. Participants completed baseline assessment commencing with task-switching and verbal fluency blocks, followed by seven training blocks and last by task-switching (near transfer) and verbal fluency (far transfer) blocks, respectively. For the baseline and transfer task-switching blocks, we used the exact same baseline and first transfer block from Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018), employing univalent stimuli and alternating-runs task sequence. Our results pointed again to the contribution of content variability to task-switching performance. No indications for far transfer were observed. Allowing for learners’ control was not found to produce additional transfer gains beyond content variability. A between-study comparison suggests that enhanced task demands, by means of bivalency, promoted higher transfer gains in the current study when compared to Sabah et al. (Psychological Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7, 2018). Taken together, the current results provide further evidence to the beneficial impact of variability on training outcomes. The lack of modulatory effect for learners’ control is discussed in relation to possible methodological limitations.

vorige artikel Effort avoidance is not simply error avoidance

volgende artikel Regular participation in leisure time activities and high cardiovascular fitness improve motor sequence learning in older adults

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Yoked control means that for every participant in the voluntary switching groups, we created a “forced twin” that received the exact same task sequence. That way we made sure that the respective groups only differ with respect to the voluntary aspect of task choice.

Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.3. CrossRef

Al-Hashimi, O., Anguera, J. A., Rolle, C., Janowich, J., Kong, E., Gazzaley, A., et al. (2013). Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults. Nature, 501(7465), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12486. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Anderson, J. R. (1982). Acquisition of cognitive skill. Psychological Review, 89(4), 369–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.4.369. CrossRef

Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2004). The cost of a voluntary task switch. Psychological Science, 15(9), 610–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00728.x. CrossRefPubMed

Arrington, C. M., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Voluntary Task-switching: Chasing the elusive homunculus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition., 31(4), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.683. CrossRef

Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41(1), 63–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x. CrossRef

Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2008). Active learning: Effects of core training design elements on self-regulatory processes, learning, and adaptability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 296–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.296. CrossRef

Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.

Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bürki, C. N., Ludwig, C., Chicherio, C., & de Ribaupierre, A. (2014). Individual differences in cognitive plasticity: an investigation of training curves in younger and older adults. Psychological Research, 78(6), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0559-3. CrossRefPubMed

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012a). Self-controlled learning: The importance of protecting perceptions of competence. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 458. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00458. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., Lewthwaite, R., & Campos, T. (2012b). Motor learning benefits of self-controlled practice in persons with Parkinson’s disease. Gait and Posture, 35(4), 601–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.12.003. CrossRefPubMed

Colzato, L. S., van Leeuwen, P. J. A., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2010). DOOM’d to switch: Superior cognitive fl exibility in players of first person shooter games. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00008. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 182–185. CrossRef

Dougherty, M. R., Hamovitz, T., & Tidwell, J. W. (2016). Reevaluating the effectiveness of n-back training on transfer through the Bayesian lens: Support for the null. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 23(1), 306–316. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0865-9. CrossRefPubMed

Dreisbach, G., & Fröber, K. (2019). How to be flexible (or not): Modulation of the flexibility-stability-balance. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418800030. CrossRef

Eisenberger, R. (1992). Learned industriousness. Psychological Review, 99(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.248. CrossRefPubMed

Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In K. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, & R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge handbooks in psychology. (pp. 683–704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816796.038 CrossRef

Ericsson, K. A. (2008). Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Academic Emergency Medicine, 15(11), 988–994. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00227.x. CrossRefPubMed

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363. CrossRef

Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.

Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). Keep flexible—keep switching! The influence of forced task switching on voluntary task switching. Cognition, 162, 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.024. CrossRefPubMed

Gardner, H. (1987). The theory of multiple intelligences. Annals of Dyslexia, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02648057. CrossRefPubMed

Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(6939), 534–537. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01647. CrossRefPubMed

Healy, A. F., Kole, J. A., & Bourne, L. E. (2014). Training principles to advance expertise. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00131. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(3), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.009. CrossRefPubMed

Inzlicht, M., Shenhav, A., & Olivola, C. Y. (2018). The effort paradox: Effort is both costly and valued. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(4), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.007. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology [Whole No. 89].

Jolles, D. D., Van Buchem, M. A., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., & Crone, E. A. (2012). Practice effects in the developing brain: A pilot study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2, S180–S191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2011.09.001. CrossRefPubMed

Karbach, J., & Kray, J. (2009). How useful is executive control training? Age differences in near and far transfer of task-switching training. Developmental Science, 12(6), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00846.x. CrossRefPubMed

Karbach, J., Mang, S., & Kray, J. (2010). Transfer of task-switching training in older age: The role of verbal processes. Psychology and Aging, 25(3), 677–683. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019845. CrossRefPubMed

Karbach, J., & Verhaeghen, P. (2014). Making working memory work. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2027–2037. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614548725. CrossRefPubMed

Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., et al. (2010). Control and interference in Task-switching-a review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019842. CrossRefPubMed

Kinzie, M. B. (1990). Requirements and benefits of effective interactive instruction: Learner control, self-regulation, and continuing motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02298244. CrossRef

Kool, W., McGuire, J. T., Rosen, Z. B., & Botvinick, M. M. (2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 665–682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020198. CrossRef

Kray, J., & Fehér, B. (2017). Age differences in the transfer and maintenance of practice-induced improvements in Task-switching: The impact of working-memory and inhibition demands. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 410. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00410. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

León, J., Núñez, J. L., & Liew, J. (2014). Self-determination and STEM education: Effects of autonomy, motivation, and self-regulated learning on high school math achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 43, 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.017. CrossRef

Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2012). Motor learning through a motivational lens. In N. J. Hodges & A. Mark Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 173–191). London: Routledge.

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6. CrossRef

Mayr, U., & Bell, T. (2006). On how to be unpredictable: Evidence from the voluntary task-switching paradigm. Psychological Science, 17, 774–780. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01781.x. CrossRefPubMed

Melby-Lervåg, M., Redick, T. S., & Hulme, C. (2016). Working memory training does not improve performance on measures of intelligence or other measures of “far transfer”: Evidence from a meta-analytic review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(4), 512–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635612. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Minear, M., & Shah, P. (2008). Training and transfer effects in task-switching. Memory and Cognition, 36(8), 1470–1483. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.336.8.1470. CrossRefPubMed

Monsell, S. (2003). Task-switching review. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00028-7. CrossRefPubMed

Morrison, A. B., & Chein, J. M. (2011). Does working memory training work? The promise and challenges of enhancing cognition by training working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0034-0. CrossRefPubMed

Muraven, M., Shmueli, D., & Burkley, E. (2006). Conserving self-control strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(3), 524–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.3.524. CrossRefPubMed

Navon, D., & Gopher, D. (1979). On the economy of the human-processing system. Psychological Review, 86(3), 214–255. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.86.3.214. CrossRef

Olfers, K. J. F., & Band, G. P. H. (2018). Game-based training of flexibility and attention improves task-switch performance: near and far transfer of cognitive training in an EEG study. Psychological Research, 82(1), 186–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-017-0933-z. CrossRefPubMed

Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504795. CrossRef

Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In M. Piattelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Quiñones, M. A. (1995). Pretraining context effects: training assignment as feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.2.226. CrossRef

Ruona, W. E. A., Leimbach, M., Holton, III, E. F., & Bates, R. (2002). The relationship between learner utility reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees. International Journal of Training and Development, 6(4), 218–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2419.00160. CrossRef

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020. CrossRefPubMed

Sabah, K., Dolk, T., Meiran, N., & Dreisbach, G. (2018). When less is more: costs and benefits of varied vs. fixed content and structure in short-term task-switching training. Psychological Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1006-7. CrossRefPubMed

Sanli, E. A., & Patterson, J. T. (2013). Learning effects of self-controlled practice scheduling for children and adults: Are the advantages different? Perceptual and Motor Skills, 116(3), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.2466/23.22.pms.116.3.741-749. CrossRefPubMed

Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x. CrossRef

Schmidt, C. S. M., Schumacher, L. V., Römer, P., Leonhart, R., Beume, L., Martin, M., et al. (2017). Are semantic and phonological fluency based on the same or distinct sets of cognitive processes? Insights from factor analyses in healthy adults and stroke patients. Neuropsychologia, 99, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.02.019. CrossRefPubMed

Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 419–440. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2813. CrossRef

Schwaighofer, M., Fischer, F., & Bühner, M. (2015). Does working memory training transfer? A meta-analysis including training conditions as moderators. Educational Psychologist, 50(2), 138–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1036274. CrossRef

Soveri, A., Antfolk, J., Karlsson, L., Salo, B., & Laine, M. (2017). Working memory training revisited: A multi-level meta-analysis of n-back training studies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 24(4), 1077–1096. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1217-0. CrossRefPubMed

Spiro, R. J., & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia (pp. 163–206). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Tafarodi, R. W., Milne, A. B., & Smith, A. J. (1999). The confidence of choice: Evidence for an augmentation effect on self-perceived performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(11), 1405–1416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167299259006. CrossRef

Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1997). Clustering and switching as two components of verbal fluency: Evidence from younger and older healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 11(1), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.11.1.138. CrossRefPubMed

Troyer, A. K., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., Alexander, M. P., & Stuss, D. (1998). Clustering and switching on verbal fluency: The effects of focal frontal- and temporal-lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 36(6), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00152-8. CrossRefPubMed

Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task-switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136(4), 601–626. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019791. CrossRefPubMed

Westbrook, A., Kester, D., & Braver, T. S. (2013). What is the subjective cost of cognitive effort? Load, trait, and aging effects revealed by economic preference. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068210. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Enhancing task-demands disrupts learning but enhances transfer gains in short-term task-switching training
Auteurs: Katrina Sabah
Thomas Dolk
Nachshon Meiran
Gesine Dreisbach
Publicatiedatum: 18-04-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01335-y

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

Off-line learning in a rhythmic bimanual task: early feedback dependency is reduced over wakefulness

Functions of spontaneous and voluntary future thinking: evidence from subjective ratings

The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning

Gender differences in the experienced emotional intensity of experimentally induced memories of negative scenes

A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls

Can you voluntarily forget what you are planning to forget? Behavioral evidence for the underlying truth of the cost–benefit principle