Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

27-04-2020 | Original Article

Sweet taste experience improves prosocial intentions and attractiveness ratings

Auteurs: Michael Schaefer, Anne Reinhardt, Eileen Garbow, Deborah Dressler

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2021

Abstract

Taste-related terms such as bitter or sweet are often used to describe people’s behavior. For example, sweetness metaphors are often used when giving nicknames for romantic partners or when characterizing a friendly person. Previous studies have suggested that sweet taste may be linked to prosocial behavior. Examining a total of 517 participants, we here demonstrate that experiencing sweet taste also seems to have an impact on subsequent attractiveness ratings of faces. Participants were asked to rate pictures of young people and of art. Before this task, they were primed either with sweet candies or with salty snacks. Results revealed that sweet taste increased subsequent attractiveness ratings of faces. In addition, results confirmed earlier findings that sweet taste affected prosocial behavior. Our results suggest that sweetness seems to be more than a mere linguistic metaphor; it influences prosocial behavior as well as attractiveness ratings of faces. We discuss the results with recent findings of physical-to-psychological links to certain figures in speech.

vorige artikel People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires

volgende artikel Gender differences in the experienced emotional intensity of experimentally induced memories of negative scenes

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Experiment 2 was primarily motivated to replicate the findings of taste experiences on face ratings of experiment 1. Thus, we here omitted the helping question (which has been examined before, e.g., Meier et al., 2012).

Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328(5986), 1712–1715. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ashton, M. C., Pilkington, A. C., & Lee, K. (2012). Do prosocial people prefer sweet-tasting foods? An attempted replication of Meier, Moeller, Riemer-Peltz, and Robinson. Journal of Research in Personality, 52, 42–46. CrossRef

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. CrossRef

Betella, A., & Verschure, P. F. (2016). The affective slider: A digital self-assessment scale for the measurement of human emotions. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148037. CrossRefPubMed

Chan, K. Q., Tong, E. M., Tan, D. H., & Koh, A. H. (2013). What do love and jealousy taste like? Emotion, 13(6), 1142–1149. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033758. CrossRefPubMed

Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M., & Anderson, A. K. (2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323(5918), 1222–1226. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165565. CrossRefPubMed

Denke, C., Rotte, M., Heinze, H. J., & Schaefer, M. (2016). Lying and the subsequent desire for toothpaste: Activity in the somatosensory cortex predicts embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor. Cerebral Cortex, 26(2), 477–484. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu170. CrossRefPubMed

Eskine, J., Kacinik, N. A., & Prinz, J. J. (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influneces moral judgement. Psychological Science, 22, 295–299. CrossRef

Fetterman, A. K., Bair, J. L., Werth, M., Landkammer, F., & Robinson, M. D. (2016). The scope and consequences of metaphoric thinking: Using individual differences in metaphor usage to understand how metaphor functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000067. CrossRefPubMed

Gailliot, M. T., & Baumeister, R. F. (2007). The physiology of willpower: Linking blood glucose to self-control. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(4), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307303030. CrossRefPubMed

Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef

Gilead, M., Gal, O., Polak, M., & Cholow, Y. (2015). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors. The case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46, 167–173. CrossRef

Kang, Y., Williams, L. E., Clark, M. S., Gray, J. R., & Bargh, J. A. (2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6(4), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq077. CrossRefPubMed

Krohne, H. W., Egloff, B., Kohlmann, C., & Tausch, A. (1996). Investigations with a German version of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS). Diagnostica, 42, 139–156.

Lakoff, G. (2014). Mapping the brain's metaphor circuitry: Metaphorical thought in everyday reason. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 958. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00958. CrossRefPubMed

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenges to western thought. New York: Basic Books.

Lee, S. W. S. (2016). Multimodal priming of abstract concepts. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 37–44. CrossRef

Ma, D. S., Correll, J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2015). The Chicago face database: A free stimulus set of faces and norming data. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1122–1135. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0532-5. CrossRefPubMed

Meier, B. P., Moeller, S. K., Riemer-Peltz, M., & Robinson, M. D. (2012). Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025253. CrossRefPubMed

Ren, D., Tan, K., Arriaga, X. B., & Chan, K. Q. (2015). Sweet love: The effects of sweet taste experience on romantic perceptions. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 32, 905–921. CrossRef

Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2014). Bitter taste causes hostility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(12), 1589–1597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214552792. CrossRefPubMed

Sagioglou, C., & Greitemeyer, T. (2016). Individual differences in bitter taste preferences are associated with antisocial personality traits. Appetite, 96, 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.09.031. CrossRefPubMed

Schlosser, A. E. (2015). The sweet taste of gratitude: Feeling grateful increases choice and consumption of sweets. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 25, 561–576. CrossRef

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press. CrossRef

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070. CrossRef

Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162548. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Williams, L. E., Huang, J. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (2009). The scaffolded mind: Higher mental processes are grounded in early experience of the physical world. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(7), 1257–1267. CrossRef

Zhong, C. B., & Liljenquist, K. (2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313(5792), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130726. CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Sweet taste experience improves prosocial intentions and attractiveness ratings
Auteurs: Michael Schaefer
Anne Reinhardt
Eileen Garbow
Deborah Dressler
Publicatiedatum: 27-04-2020
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01336-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2021

People have modest, not good, insight into their face recognition ability: a comparison between self-report questionnaires

Inhibitory mechanisms in motor imagery: disentangling different forms of inhibition using action mode switching

Exploring to learn and learning to explore

Asymmetric coupling of action and outcome valence in active and observational feedback learning

A gifted SNARC? Directional spatial–numerical associations in gifted children with high-level math skills do not differ from controls

When cognitive control harms rather than helps: individuals with high working memory capacity are less efficient at infrequent contraction of attentional breadth