Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Recent findings suggest that a Simon effect (SE) can be induced in Individual go/nogo tasks when responding next to an event-producing object salient enough to provide a reference for the spatial coding of one’s own action. However, there is skepticism against referential coding for the joint Simon effect (JSE) by proponents of task co-representation. In the present study, we tested assumptions of task co-representation and referential coding by introducing unexpected double response events in a joint go/nogo and a joint independent go/nogo task. In Experiment 1b, we tested if task representations are functionally similar in joint and standard Simon tasks. In Experiment 2, we tested sequential updating of task co-representation after unexpected single response events in the joint independent go/nogo task. Results showed increased JSEs following unexpected events in the joint go/nogo and joint independent go/nogo task (Experiment 1a). While the former finding is in line with the assumptions made by both accounts (task co-representation and referential coding), the latter finding supports referential coding. In contrast to Experiment 1a, we found a decreased SE after unexpected events in the standard Simon task (Experiment 1b), providing evidence against the functional equivalence assumption between joint and two-choice Simon tasks of the task co-representation account. Finally, we found an increased JSE also following unexpected single response events (Experiment 2), ruling out that the findings of the joint independent go/nogo task in Experiment 1a were due to a re-conceptualization of the task situation. In conclusion, our findings support referential coding also for the joint Simon effect.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ansorge, U., & Wühr, P. (2004). A response-discrimination account of the Simon effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 365–377. PubMed
Colzato, L. S., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., & Hommel, B. (2013). Increasing self-other integration through divergent thinking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1011–1016. CrossRef
De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. PubMed
Dittrich, K., Dolk, T., Rothe-Wulf, A., Klauer, K. C., & Prinz, W. (2013). Keys and seats: spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 1725–1736. CrossRef
Dittrich, K., Rothe, A., & Klauer, K. C. (2012). Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 911–929. CrossRef
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1248–1260. PubMed
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Prinz, W., & Liepelt, R. (2014b). The joint flanker effect: less social as previously thought. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1224–1230. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0583-8.
Hommel, B. (1993b). The relationship between stimulus processing and response selection in the Simon task: evidence for a temporal overlap. Psychological Research, 55, 280–290. CrossRef
Hommel, B. (1996). S-R compatibility effects without response uncertainty. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 546–571. CrossRef
James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vol. 2). New York: Dover Publications. CrossRef
Kiernan, D., Ray, M., & Welsh, T. N. (2012). Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 914–920. CrossRef
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: conflict basis for stimulus-response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 252–270. CrossRef
Lu, C. H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of the irrelevant location information on performance: a review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 174–207. CrossRef
Müller, B. C. N., Brass, M., Kühn, S., Tsai, C. C., Nieuwboer, W., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. (2011a). When pinoccio acts like a human, a wooden hand becomes embodied. Action co-representation for non-biological agents. Neuropsychologica, 49, 1373–1377. CrossRef
Müller, B. C. N., Oostendorp, A. K., Kühn, S., Brass, M., Dijksterhuis, A., & van Baaren, R. B. When triangles become human: action co-representation for objects. Interaction Studies. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-4381886 (in press)
Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1989). Splitting visual space with attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 164–169. PubMed
Nunez Castellar, E., Kühn, S., Fias, W., & Notebaert, W. (2010). Outcome expectancy and not accuracy determines posterror slowing: ERP support. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10, 270–278. CrossRef
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–196. CrossRef
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Wijnen, J., & Burle, B. (2004). Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots. In M. Posner (Ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention. New York: Guilford Press.
Ruys, K. I., & Aarts, H. (2010). When competition merges people’s behavior: interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1130–1133. CrossRef
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., & Prinz, W. (2005). How two share a task: corepresenting stimulus-response mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 1234–1246. PubMed
Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility: An integrated perspective Advances in Psychology (vol 65) (pp. 31–86). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal for Applied Psychology, 51, 300–304. CrossRef
Stenzel, A., Chinellato, E., Tirado Bou, M. A., del Pobil, A. P., Lappe, M., & Liepelt, R. (2012). When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: co-representation of robotic actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1073–1077. PubMed
Treccani, B., Umiltá, C., & Tagliabue, M. (2006). Simon effect with and without awareness of the accessory stimulus. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 268–286. PubMed
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804.
Wenke, D., Atmaca, S., Holländer, A., Liepelt, R., Baess, P., & Prinz, W. (2011). What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. The Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 2, 147–172. CrossRef
Winkel, J., Wijnen, J. G., Ridderinkhoff, K. R., Groen, I. I. A., Derrfuss, J., Danielmeier, C., & Forstmann, B. U. (2009). Your conflict matters to me! Behavioral and neural manifestations of control adjustment after self-experienced and observed decision-conflict. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3, 57. doi: 10.3389/neuro.09.057.2009. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
- Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg