Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 4/2016

12-06-2015 | Original Article

The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking

Auteurs: Greg Huffman, Jay Pratt

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

If given a relatively small number and asked to make a speeded parity judgment using the left and right responses, people typically respond faster with their left response. Conversely, if given a relatively large number, people usually respond faster with their right response. This finding, however, has primarily been shown using speeded tasks with response time as the primary measure. Here, we report an experiment testing if this remains to be the case in a non-speeded target identification. Using an object-substitution masking paradigm with no emphasis on response speed, number magnitude compatibility with the response hand influenced the accuracy of parity judgments. Given the non-speeded nature of the task, accuracy changes indicate that compatibility affects perception, rather than just response selection. This is explained using a common coding, feature integration approach in which stimuli and responses are represented in a common code and bidirectionally influence each other.
Voetnoten
1
For the remainder of this paper, ‘correspondence’ will refer to the relationship between the task-irrelevant spatial information and response hand while ‘compatibility’ will refer to the relationship between the task-relevant feature and response hand.
 
2
Of course, in Simon tasks the stimuli are generally static. The difference, however, is that the spatial information is not, strictly speaking, part of the stimuli so is not continuously processed while transforming the stimulus into a response.
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1506–1521.PubMed Bae, G. Y., Choi, J. M., Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2009). Transfer of magnitude and spatial mappings to the SNARC effect for parity judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1506–1521.PubMed
go back to reference Cardoso-Leite, P., Mamassian, P., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2010). A new look at sensory attenuation. Action–effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychological Science, 21, 1740–1745.CrossRefPubMed Cardoso-Leite, P., Mamassian, P., Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Waszak, F. (2010). A new look at sensory attenuation. Action–effect anticipation affects sensitivity, not response bias. Psychological Science, 21, 1740–1745.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731.PubMed De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731–750. doi:10.​1037/​0096-1523.​20.​4.​731.PubMed
go back to reference Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507.CrossRef Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: the psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 481–507.CrossRef
go back to reference Daar, M., & Pratt, J. (2008). Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection. Cortex, 44, 400–405.CrossRefPubMed Daar, M., & Pratt, J. (2008). Digits affect actions: the SNARC effect and response selection. Cortex, 44, 400–405.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Girauz, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRef Dehaene, S., Bossini, S., & Girauz, P. (1993). The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 371–396.CrossRef
go back to reference Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’, H. G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.CrossRefPubMed Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Le Clec’, H. G., Koechlin, E., Mueller, M., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., et al. (1998). Semantic priming. Nature, 395, 597–600.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMed Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240.PubMed
go back to reference Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action–effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138–154.CrossRefPubMed Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action–effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138–154.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135–139.CrossRef Enns, J. T., & Di Lollo, V. (1997). Object substitution: a new form of masking in unattended visual locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135–139.CrossRef
go back to reference Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.CrossRefPubMed Fischer, M. H., Castel, A. D., Dodd, M. D., & Pratt, J. (2003). Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience, 6, 555–556.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fitts, P. M., & Seegar, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of the stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.CrossRefPubMed Fitts, P. M., & Seegar, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of the stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199–210.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 659–673.CrossRef Gevers, W., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2005). Towards a common processing architecture underlying Simon and SNARC effects. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 659–673.CrossRef
go back to reference Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006a). Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental psychology, 53, 58–68.CrossRefPubMed Gevers, W., Ratinckx, E., De Baene, W., & Fias, W. (2006a). Further evidence that the SNARC effect is processed along a dual-route architecture: evidence from the lateralized readiness potential. Experimental psychology, 53, 58–68.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006b). Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.CrossRefPubMed Gevers, W., Verguts, T., Reynvoet, B., Caessens, B., & Fias, W. (2006b). Numbers and space: a computational model of the SNARC effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 32–44.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Goodhew, S. C., Pratt, J., Dux, P. E., & Ferber, S. (2013). Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 859–877.CrossRef Goodhew, S. C., Pratt, J., Dux, P. E., & Ferber, S. (2013). Substituting objects from consciousness: a review of object substitution masking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 859–877.CrossRef
go back to reference Gozli, D. G., Goodhew, S. C., Moskowitz, J. B., & Pratt, J. (2013). Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing. Psychological research, 77, 528–539.CrossRefPubMed Gozli, D. G., Goodhew, S. C., Moskowitz, J. B., & Pratt, J. (2013). Ideomotor perception modulates visuospatial cueing. Psychological research, 77, 528–539.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1540–1554.CrossRef Herwig, A., Prinz, W., & Waszak, F. (2007). Two modes of sensorimotor integration in intention-based and stimulus-based actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1540–1554.CrossRef
go back to reference Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action–effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Herwig, A., & Waszak, F. (2012). Action–effect bindings and ideomotor learning in intention- and stimulus-based actions. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 444.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef Hommel, B. (1998). Event files: evidence for automatic integration of stimulus-response episodes. Visual Cognition, 5, 183–216.CrossRef
go back to reference Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. (discussion 878–937).CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. (discussion 878–937).CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17.CrossRefPubMed Hommel, B., Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2004). A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task. Psychological Research, 68, 1–17.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Kunde, W. (2004). Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects. Psychological Research, 68, 91–96.CrossRefPubMed Kunde, W. (2004). Response priming by supraliminal and subliminal action effects. Psychological Research, 68, 91–96.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moretto, G., & di Pellegrino, G. (2008). Grasping numbers. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 505–515.CrossRefPubMed Moretto, G., & di Pellegrino, G. (2008). Grasping numbers. Experimental Brain Research, 188, 505–515.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.CrossRefPubMed Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (1997). Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 23, 861–872.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1197–1207.PubMed Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verguts, T., & Fias, W. (2006). Shared spatial representations for numbers and space: the reversal of the SNARC and the Simon effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1197–1207.PubMed
go back to reference Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.CrossRefPubMed Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research, 75, 61–65.CrossRefPubMed Pfister, R., Kiesel, A., & Hoffmann, J. (2011). Learning at any rate: action–effect learning for stimulus-based actions. Psychological Research, 75, 61–65.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: instant control over spatial–numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1953–1958.CrossRefPubMed Pfister, R., Schroeder, P. A., & Kunde, W. (2013). SNARC struggles: instant control over spatial–numerical associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 1953–1958.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129.CrossRef Prinz, W. (1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9, 129.CrossRef
go back to reference Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.CrossRefPubMed Proctor, R. W., & Cho, Y. S. (2006). Polarity correspondence: a general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 416–442.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.CrossRef Restle, F. (1970). Speed of adding and comparing numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 274–278.CrossRef
go back to reference Roussel, C., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2014). Action prediction modulates both neurophysiological and psychophysical indices of sensory attenuation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Roussel, C., Hughes, G., & Waszak, F. (2014). Action prediction modulates both neurophysiological and psychophysical indices of sensory attenuation. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 115.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651–664.CrossRef Schwarz, W., & Keus, I. M. (2004). Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 651–664.CrossRef
go back to reference Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers–a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599.CrossRefPubMed Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). Reading space into numbers–a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect. Cognition, 108, 590–599.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Random walks on the mental number line. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 43–49.CrossRefPubMed Shaki, S., & Fischer, M. H. (2014). Random walks on the mental number line. Experimental Brain Research, 232, 43–49.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331.CrossRef Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 328–331.CrossRef
go back to reference Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174–176.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.CrossRefPubMed Stürmer, B., Leuthold, H., Soetens, E., Schröter, H., & Sommer, W. (2002). Control over location-based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1345–1363.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed Treisman, A. M., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114–119.CrossRefPubMed van Dijck, J. P., & Fias, W. (2011). A working memory account for spatial–numerical associations. Cognition, 119, 114–119.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Wolfensteller, U., & Ruge, H. (2011). On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1273–1289.CrossRef Wolfensteller, U., & Ruge, H. (2011). On the timescale of stimulus-based action–effect learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1273–1289.CrossRef
go back to reference Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525. Wood, G., Willmes, K., Nuerk, H. C., & Fischer, M. H. (2008). On the cognitive link between space and number: a meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 489–525.
go back to reference Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 282–288.CrossRef Wühr, P. (2005). Evidence for gating of direct response activation in the Simon task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12(2), 282–288.CrossRef
go back to reference Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260–1270.CrossRefPubMed Wühr, P., & Müsseler, J. (2001). Time course of the blindness to response-compatible stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 27, 1260–1270.CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
The effect of SNARC compatibility on perceptual accuracy: evidence from object substitution masking
Auteurs
Greg Huffman
Jay Pratt
Publicatiedatum
12-06-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0679-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2016

Psychological Research 4/2016 Naar de uitgave