Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The key point of a paradigm initially proposed by Perruchet (Pavlov J Biol Sci 20:163–170, 1985) to dissociate conscious expectancies from automatic-link formation in classical conditioning settings is the use of a partial reinforcement schedule, in which the unconditioned stimulus (US) follows the conditioned stimulus (CS) only half of the time on average. Given (pseudo) randomization, the whole sequence comprises runs of CS alone and runs of CS–US pairs of various lengths. When the preceding run goes from a long sequence of CS alone to a long sequence of CS–US pairs (via shorter sequences), associative strength should grow up, whereas conscious expectancy should decrease. Earlier studies have shown that, in most cases, conditioned performance parallels associative strength. As an exception, however, a few reports suggest that conditioned electrodermal responses (EDRs) would follow predicted changes in US expectancies. This paper presents an experiment that replicates this outcome. However, when the performances from a control group were taken as a baseline to control for response habituation, corrected conditioned EDRs were shown to follow associative strength. This suggests that the atypical pattern of conditioned EDRs in the Perruchet paradigm would be due to the fact that EDRs are more sensitive to habituation than responses involved in other associative learning settings. These results further challenge the recent “propositional” view of conditioning, which stipulates that conditioned responses in humans are the consequence of participants’ conscious inferences about the relationships between the CS and the US, which would lead the CS to generate conscious expectancy for the US.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Barrett, L. C., & Livesey, E. J. (2010). Dissociations between expectancy and performance in simple and two-choice reaction-time tasks: a test of associative and nonassociative explanations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 3, 864–877. doi: 10.1037/a0019403.
Boucsein, W. (1992). Electrodermal activity. New York: Plenum Press. CrossRef
De Houwer, J. (2014). Why a propositional single-process model of associative learning deserves to be defended. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual processes in social psychology (pp. 530–541). New York: Guilford.
Destrebecqz, A., Perruchet, P., Cleeremans, A., Laureys, S., Maquet, P., & Peigneux, P. (2010). The influence of temporal factors on automatic priming and conscious expectancy in a simple reaction time task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 291–309. CrossRef
Howell, D. C. (2010). Statistical methods for psychology (8th ed.). Belmont: Cengage Wadsworth.
McAndrew, A., Jones, F. W., McLaren, R. P., & McLaren, I. P. L. (2012). Dissociating expectancy of shock and changes in skin conductance: an investigation of the perruchet effect using an electrodermal paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 38, 203–208. PubMed
Mitchell, C. J., Wardle, S. G., Lovibond, P. F., Weidemann, G., & Chang, B. P. I. (2010). Do reaction times in the Perruchet effect reflect variations in the strength of an associative link? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 567–572. doi: 10.1037/a0018433. PubMed
Pavlov, I. P. (1928). Lectures on conditioned reflexes (trans: Gantt, W.H.). London: Allen and Unwin.
Perruchet, P. (1985). A pitfall for the expectancy theory of human eyelid conditioning. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Sciences, 20, 163–170.
Perruchet, P. (2015). Dissociating conscious expectancies from automatic link formation in associative learning: a review on the so-called Perruchet effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 41, 105–127.
Perruchet, P., Cleeremans, A., & Destrebecqz, A. (2006). Dissociating the effects of automatic activation and explicit expectancy on reaction times in a simple associative learning task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 955–965. doi: 10.1037/0278-73126.96.36.1995. PubMed
Rankin, C. H., Abrams, T., Barry, R. J., Bhatnagar, S., Clayton, D. F., Colombo, J., & Thompson, R. F. (2009). Habituation revisited: an updated and revised description of the behavioral characteristics of habituation. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 92(2), 135–138. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2008.09.012. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and non-reinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Weidemann, G., Tangen, J. M., Lovibond, P. F., & Mitchell, C. J. (2009). Is Perruchet’s dissociation between eyeblink conditioned responding and outcome expectancy evidence for two learning systems? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 35, 169–172. doi: 10.1037/a0013294. PubMed
Wilcox, R. R. (1987). New designs in analysis of variance. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 29–60. CrossRef
- Dissociating conscious expectancies from automatic-link formation in an electrodermal conditioning paradigm
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg