Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Journal of Child and Family Studies

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies 10/2018

20-06-2018 | Original Paper

Cost-Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in Clinics versus Homes: Client, Provider, Administrator, and Overall Perspectives

Auteurs: Alexis N. French, Brian T. Yates, Timothy R. Fowles

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Child and Family Studies | Uitgave 10/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is effective in decreasing negative child behaviors when delivered in clinics. Emerging research suggests that delivering PCIT in client homes can produce similar outcomes … but at what cost? Home PCIT still consumes valuable client time, but only for sessions. Home PCIT could reduce barriers to continued parent participation, and costs, by not requiring clients to spend time and money traveling to and from clinics. Home PCIT also does not require that parenting skills learned in clinics be generalized to homes. We assessed and compared costs of clinic and home PCIT at individual client and program levels of specificity from client and provider perspectives for 264 children and parents (clinic = 139, home = 125). We also included an administrator perspective and a client + provider + administrator = overall perspective. Multivariate analyses of covariance applied to imputed datasets found that, because significantly more sessions were held for PCIT delivered in homes than in clinics (a mean 18 versus 11 sessions, respectively), home PCIT cost significantly more from the overall perspective ($3913 versus $1821 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT) and the provider perspective ($3326 versus $950 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), significantly less from the administrator perspective ($125 versus $397 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), and about the same from the client perspective ($352 versus $427 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT). Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) calculated for individual clients were significantly better for clinic PCIT from provider and overall perspectives but not from the administrator or client perspectives.
vorige artikel Preliminary Investigation of Whole-School Mindfulness in Education Programs and Children’s Mindfulness-Based Coping Strategies
volgende artikel Effectiveness of a Universal Web-based Parenting Program to Promote Positive Parenting: Patterns and Predictors on Program Satisfaction
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bagner, D. M., & Eyberg, S. M. (2007). Parent-child interaction therapy for disruptive behavior in children with mental retardation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 418–429. PubMed
Bagner, D. M., Sheinkopf, S. J., Vohr, B. R., & Lester, B. M. (2010). Parenting intervention for externalizing behavior problems in children born premature: An initial examination. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 31, 209–216. PubMed
Bell, S., & Eyberg, S. M. (2002). Parent-child interaction therapy: A dyadic intervention for the treatment of young children with conduct problems. In L. VandeCreek, S. Knapp & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book 20, (57–74). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Beveridge, R. M., Fowles, T. R., Masse, J. J., McGoron, L., Smith, M. A., & Parrish, B. P., et al. (2015). State-wide dissemination and implementation of parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT): Application of theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 38–48.
Boggs, S. R., Eyberg, S. M., Edwards, D. L., Rayfield, A., Jacobs, J., Bagner, D., & Hood, K. K. (2004). Outcomes of parent–child interaction therapy: A comparison of treatment completers and study dropouts one to three years later. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 26, 1–22.
Chaffin, M., Silovsky, J. F., Funderburk, B., Valle, L. A., Brestan, E. V., & Balachova, T., et al. (2004). Parent-child interaction therapy with physically abusive parents: Efficacy for reducing future abuse reports. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 500–510. PubMed
Colvin, A., Eyberg, S. M., & Adams, C. D. (1999). Restandardization of the eyberg child behavior inventory. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Child Study Laboratory.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th edn. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Eyberg, S. M. (1988). Parent–child interaction therapy: Integration of traditional and behavioral concerns. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 10, 33–46.
Eyberg, S. M. (2004). The PCIT story part 1: Conceptual foundation. PCIT Pages: The Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Newsletter, 1, 1–2.
Eyberg, S. M., Funderburk, B. W., Hembree-Kigin, T. L., McNeil, C. B., & Querido, J. G. (2001). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with behavior problem children: One and two year maintenance of treatment effects in the family. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 23, 1–20.
Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidenced-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 215–237.
Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory & Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Fernandez, M. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2009). Predicting treatment and follow-up attrition in Parent-Child Interaction Therapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 37, 431–441.
Fowles, T. R., Masse, J. J., McGoron, K. L., Beveridge, R., Williamson, A., & Smith, M. S. (2018). Home-based vs. clinic-based Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): Comparative effectiveness in the context of dissemination and implementation. Journal of Child and family Studies, 27, 1115–1129. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10826-017-0958-3. CrossRef
Galanter, R., Self-Brown, S., Valente, J. R., Dorsey, S., Whitaker, D. J., Bertuglia-Haley, M., & Prieto, M. (2012). Effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy delivered to at-risk families in the home setting. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34, 177–196.
Ghosh, D., & Vogt, A. (2012). Outliers: An evaluation of methodologies. Joint Statistical Meetings (pp. 3455–3460). San Diego, CA: American Statistical Association.
Glick, H. A., Doshi, J. A., Sonnad, S. S., & Polsky, D. (2015). Economic evaluation in clinical trial. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goldfine, M. E., Wagner, S. M., Branstetter, S. A., & McNeil, C. B. (2008). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: An examination of cost-effectiveness. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 5, 119–141.
Graham, J. W., Olchowski, A. E., & Gilreath, T. D. (2007). How many imputations are really needed? Some practical clarifications of multiple imputation theory. Prevention Science, 8, 206–213. PubMed
Hanf, C., & Kling, J. (1973). Facilitating parent–child interaction: A two-stage training model. Portland, OR: University of Oregon Medical School. Unpublished manuscript.
Heinrichs, N., Bertram, H., Kuschel, A., & Hahlweg, K. (2005). Parent recruitment and retention in a universal prevention program for child behavior and emotional problems: Barriers to research and program participation. Prevention Science, 6, 275–286. PubMed
Kazdin, A. E., Holland, L., & Crowley, M. (1997). Family experience of barriers to treatment and premature termination from child therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 453–463. PubMed
Lanier, P., Kohl, P., Benz, J., Swinger, D., Moussette, P., & Drake, B. (2011). Parent-child interaction therapy in a community setting: Examining outcomes, attrition, and treatment setting. Research on Social Work Practice, 1, 689–698. PubMedPubMedCentral
Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Masse, J. J., & McNeil, C. B. (2008). In-home parent-child interaction therapy: Clinical considerations. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30, 127–135.
Matos, M., Bauermeister, J. J., & Bernal, G. (2009). Parent-child interaction therapy for Puerto Rican preschool children with ADHD and behavior problems: A pilot efficacy study. Family Process, 48, 232–252. PubMed
McCabe, K., & Yeh, M. (2009). Parent child interaction therapy for Mexican Americans: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38, 753–759.
Neumann, P. J., Sanders, G. D., Russell, L. B., Siegel, J. E., & Ganiats, T. G. (2017). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nixon, R. D. (2001). Changes in hyperactivity and temperament in behaviourally disturbed preschoolers after parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT). Behaviour Change, 18, 168–176.
Nock, M. K., & Kazdin, A. E. (2001). Parent expectancies for child therapy: Assessment and relation to participation in treatment. Journal of Child and family Studies, 10, 155–180.
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314.
Patterson, G. R. (1982). A social learning approach: 3. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
Rich, B. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2001). Accuracy of assessment: The discriminative and predictive power of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. Ambulatory Child Health, 7, 249–257.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sampaio, F., Enebrink, P., Mihalopoulos, C., & Feldman, I. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of four parenting programs and bibliotherapy for parents of children with conduct problems. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 19, 201–212. PubMed
Sava, F. A., Yates, B. T., Lupu, V., Hatieganu, I., Szentagotai, A., & David, D. (2009). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cognitive therapy, rational emotive behavioral therapy, and fluoxetine (Prozac®) in treating depression: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 36–52. PubMed
Schuhmann, E. M., Foote, R., Eyberg, S. M., Boggs, S., & Algina, J. (1998). Parent-child interaction therapy: Interim report of a randomized trial with short-term maintenance. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 34–45. PubMed
Siegert, F. A., & Yates, B. T. (1980). Cost-effectiveness of individual in-office, individual in-home, and group delivery systems for behavioral child-management. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 3, 123–152.
Sterne, J. A., White, I. A., Carlin, J. B., Spratt, M., Royston, P., & Keyword, M. G., et al. (2009). Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. British Medical Journal, 338, b2393. PubMedPubMedCentral
Thomas, R., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2011). Accumulating evidence for parent-child interaction therapy in the prevention of child maltreatment. Child Development, 82, 177–192. PubMed
Ware, L. M., McNeil, C. B., Masse, J., & Stevens, S. (2008). Efficacy of in-home parent-child interaction therapy. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30, 99–126.
Yates, B. T. (1980). Improving effectiveness and reducing costs in mental health. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Yates, B. T. (1994). Toward the incorporation of costs, cost-effectiveness analysis, and cost-benefit analysis into clinical research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 729–736. PubMed
Yates, B. T. (1996). Analyzing costs, procedures, processes, and outcomes in human services: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yates, B. T. (1999). Measuring and improving cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit for substance abuse treatment programs: A manual. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. (NIH Publication No. 99-4518).
Yates, B. T. (2009). Cost-inclusive evaluation: A banquet of approaches for including costs, benefits, and cost-effectiveness and cost-benefit analyses in your next evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning, 32, 52–54. PubMed
Yates, B. T., Haven, W. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (1979). Cost-effectiveness analysis at Learning House: How much change for how much money? In J. S. Stumphauzer (Ed.), Progress in behavior therapy with delinquents (pp. 186–222). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Metagegevens
Titel
Cost-Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in Clinics versus Homes: Client, Provider, Administrator, and Overall Perspectives
Auteurs
Alexis N. French
Brian T. Yates
Timothy R. Fowles
Publicatiedatum
20-06-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Child and Family Studies / Uitgave 10/2018
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1159-4

Andere artikelen Uitgave 10/2018

Journal of Child and Family Studies 10/2018 Naar de uitgave

Original Paper

Anxiety in Children and Adolescents Rated by Patients, Parents, and Teachers: Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of an ICD-10 and DSM-IV-based Rating Scale in a Large Clinical Sample

Original Paper

Adapting the Brief Coping Cat for Children with Anxiety to a Group Setting in the Spanish Public Mental Health System: a Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Study

Original Paper

Preliminary Investigation of Whole-School Mindfulness in Education Programs and Children’s Mindfulness-Based Coping Strategies

Original Paper

Measurement Invariance of the Adolescent Quality of Life-Mental Health Scale (AQOL-MHS) across Gender, Age and Treatment Context

Original Paper

The Child and the Couple: From Zero to Fifteen

Review Paper

Strategies to Engage Underrepresented Parents in Child Intervention Services: A Review of Effectiveness and Co-occurring Use