Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1159-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is effective in decreasing negative child behaviors when delivered in clinics. Emerging research suggests that delivering PCIT in client homes can produce similar outcomes … but at what cost? Home PCIT still consumes valuable client time, but only for sessions. Home PCIT could reduce barriers to continued parent participation, and costs, by not requiring clients to spend time and money traveling to and from clinics. Home PCIT also does not require that parenting skills learned in clinics be generalized to homes. We assessed and compared costs of clinic and home PCIT at individual client and program levels of specificity from client and provider perspectives for 264 children and parents (clinic = 139, home = 125). We also included an administrator perspective and a client + provider + administrator = overall perspective. Multivariate analyses of covariance applied to imputed datasets found that, because significantly more sessions were held for PCIT delivered in homes than in clinics (a mean 18 versus 11 sessions, respectively), home PCIT cost significantly more from the overall perspective ($3913 versus $1821 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT) and the provider perspective ($3326 versus $950 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), significantly less from the administrator perspective ($125 versus $397 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT), and about the same from the client perspective ($352 versus $427 per child receiving home versus clinic PCIT). Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) calculated for individual clients were significantly better for clinic PCIT from provider and overall perspectives but not from the administrator or client perspectives.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Ainsworth, M. D., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Bell, S., & Eyberg, S. M. (2002). Parent-child interaction therapy: A dyadic intervention for the treatment of young children with conduct problems. In L. VandeCreek, S. Knapp & T. L. Jackson (Eds.), Innovations in clinical practice: A source book 20, (57–74). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
Beveridge, R. M., Fowles, T. R., Masse, J. J., McGoron, L., Smith, M. A., & Parrish, B. P., et al. (2015). State-wide dissemination and implementation of parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT): Application of theory. Children and Youth Services Review, 48, 38–48. CrossRef
Blomström, P., Ekman, M., Blomström Lundqvist, C., Calvert, M. J., Freemantle, N., & Lönnerholm, S., et al. (2008). Cost effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in the Nordic region: An analysis based on the CARE-HF trial. European Journal of Heart Failure, 10, 869–877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.06.018. CrossRefPubMed
Boggs, S. R., Eyberg, S. M., Edwards, D. L., Rayfield, A., Jacobs, J., Bagner, D., & Hood, K. K. (2004). Outcomes of parent–child interaction therapy: A comparison of treatment completers and study dropouts one to three years later. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 26, 1–22. CrossRef
CityFeet. (2015, March 20). Search commercial property listings, zip code, select property type: “office” and “medical office.” http://www.cityfeet.com
Colvin, A., Eyberg, S. M., & Adams, C. D. (1999). Restandardization of the eyberg child behavior inventory. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida, Child Study Laboratory.
Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th edn. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Eyberg, S. M. (1988). Parent–child interaction therapy: Integration of traditional and behavioral concerns. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 10, 33–46. CrossRef
Eyberg, S. M. (2004). The PCIT story part 1: Conceptual foundation. PCIT Pages: The Parent-Child Interaction Therapy Newsletter, 1, 1–2.
Eyberg, S. M., & Funderburk, B. W., (2011). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy protocol. Gainesville, FL: PCIT International. http://www.pcit.org/store/p2/2011_PCIT_Protocol--MULTIPLE_LANGUAGES_AVAILABLE%21.html
Eyberg, S. M., Funderburk, B. W., Hembree-Kigin, T. L., McNeil, C. B., & Querido, J. G. (2001). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with behavior problem children: One and two year maintenance of treatment effects in the family. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 23, 1–20. CrossRef
Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidenced-based psychosocial treatments for children and adolescents with disruptive behavior. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 215–237. CrossRef
Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. (1999). Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory & Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory-Revised. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Fernandez, M. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2009). Predicting treatment and follow-up attrition in Parent-Child Interaction Therapy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 37, 431–441.
Fowles, T. R., Masse, J. J., McGoron, K. L., Beveridge, R., Williamson, A., & Smith, M. S. (2018). Home-based vs. clinic-based Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT): Comparative effectiveness in the context of dissemination and implementation. Journal of Child and family Studies, 27, 1115–1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0958-3. CrossRef
Galanter, R., Self-Brown, S., Valente, J. R., Dorsey, S., Whitaker, D. J., Bertuglia-Haley, M., & Prieto, M. (2012). Effectiveness of parent-child interaction therapy delivered to at-risk families in the home setting. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 34, 177–196. CrossRef
Ghosh, D., & Vogt, A. (2012). Outliers: An evaluation of methodologies. Joint Statistical Meetings (pp. 3455–3460). San Diego, CA: American Statistical Association.
Glick, H. A., Doshi, J. A., Sonnad, S. S., & Polsky, D. (2015). Economic evaluation in clinical trial. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Goldfine, M. E., Wagner, S. M., Branstetter, S. A., & McNeil, C. B. (2008). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: An examination of cost-effectiveness. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 5, 119–141. CrossRef
Hanf, C., & Kling, J. (1973). Facilitating parent–child interaction: A two-stage training model. Portland, OR: University of Oregon Medical School. Unpublished manuscript.
Levin, H. M., & McEwan, P. J. (2001). Cost-effectiveness analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Loopnet. (2015, March 20). Search commercial property listings, zip code, select property type: “office” and “medical office.” http://www.loopnet.com
MapQuest. (2015, April 21). Search distance between to zip codes. http://www.mapquest.com
Masse, J. J., & McNeil, C. B. (2008). In-home parent-child interaction therapy: Clinical considerations. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30, 127–135. CrossRef
McCabe, K., & Yeh, M. (2009). Parent child interaction therapy for Mexican Americans: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 38, 753–759. CrossRef
Neumann, P. J., Sanders, G. D., Russell, L. B., Siegel, J. E., & Ganiats, T. G. (2017). Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Nixon, R. D. (2001). Changes in hyperactivity and temperament in behaviourally disturbed preschoolers after parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT). Behaviour Change, 18, 168–176. CrossRef
Nock, M. K., & Kazdin, A. E. (2001). Parent expectancies for child therapy: Assessment and relation to participation in treatment. Journal of Child and family Studies, 10, 155–180. CrossRef
Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33, 301–314. CrossRef
Patterson, G. R. (1982). A social learning approach: 3. Coercive family process. Eugene, OR: Castalia.
Rich, B. A., & Eyberg, S. M. (2001). Accuracy of assessment: The discriminative and predictive power of the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory. Ambulatory Child Health, 7, 249–257. CrossRef
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CrossRef
Sampaio, F., Enebrink, P., Mihalopoulos, C., & Feldman, I. (2016). Cost-effectiveness of four parenting programs and bibliotherapy for parents of children with conduct problems. Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, 19, 201–212. PubMed
Sava, F. A., Yates, B. T., Lupu, V., Hatieganu, I., Szentagotai, A., & David, D. (2009). Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of cognitive therapy, rational emotive behavioral therapy, and fluoxetine (Prozac®) in treating depression: A randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 36–52. CrossRefPubMed
Siegert, F. A., & Yates, B. T. (1980). Cost-effectiveness of individual in-office, individual in-home, and group delivery systems for behavioral child-management. Evaluation and the Health Professions, 3, 123–152. CrossRef
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015a). Online inflation calculator. http://www.bls.gov/data/inflation_calculator.htm
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015b). Delaware - May 2014 OES State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_03112015.htm
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015c). Delaware - May 2014 OES State Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates. http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_de.htm#00-0000
U.S. General Services Administration (2015). Search per diem rates for 2015. http://www.gsa.gov/portal/content/100715
Ware, L. M., McNeil, C. B., Masse, J., & Stevens, S. (2008). Efficacy of in-home parent-child interaction therapy. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 30, 99–126. CrossRef
Yates, B. T. (1980). Improving effectiveness and reducing costs in mental health. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
Yates, B. T. (1996). Analyzing costs, procedures, processes, and outcomes in human services: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. CrossRef
Yates, B. T. (1999). Measuring and improving cost, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit for substance abuse treatment programs: A manual. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse. (NIH Publication No. 99-4518). CrossRef
Yates, B. T., Haven, W. G., & Thoresen, C. E. (1979). Cost-effectiveness analysis at Learning House: How much change for how much money? In J. S. Stumphauzer (Ed.), Progress in behavior therapy with delinquents (pp. 186–222). Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy in Clinics versus Homes: Client, Provider, Administrator, and Overall Perspectives
Alexis N. French
Brian T. Yates
Timothy R. Fowles
- Springer US