Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This brief report presents preliminary data on the attitudes of judges on the sentencing of offenders with High Functioning Autism (HFA). Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with twenty-one California Superior Court Judges. Interviews were qualitatively coded and constant comparative analysis was utilized. Findings revealed that judges consider HFA as both a mitigating and aggravating factor in sentencing, and knowledge of an offender’s disorder could potentially help judges understand why a criminal action might have been committed. Judges voiced concerns about the criminal justice system being able to effectively help or offer sentencing options for offenders with HFA. Finally, judges reported that they are focused on using their judicial powers and influence to provide treatment and other resources during sentencing.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Attwood, A. (2006). The complete guide to asperger’s syndrome. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Barry-Walsh, J. B., & Mullen, P. E. (2004). Forensic aspects of asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 15(1), 96–107. CrossRef
Berryessa, C. M. (2014a). Judicial perceptions of media portrayals of offenders with high functioning autistic spectrum disorders. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3(1), 45–60.
Berryessa, C. M. (in press). Judges’ views on evidence of genetic contributions to mental disorders in court. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2016.1173718.
Browning, A., & Caulfield, L. (2011). The prevalence and treatment of people with asperger’s syndrome in the criminal justice system. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 11(2), 165–180. CrossRef
California Courts. (2015). Superior courts. California courts. http://www.courts.ca.gov/superiorcourts.htm. Accessed 12, January 2016.
Freckelton, I. (2011). Autism spectrum disorders and the criminal law. In M. R. Mohammadi (Ed.), A comprehensive book on autism spectrum disorders (pp. 249–272). Croatia: Intech Press.
Freckelton, I. (2013). Forensic issues in autism spectrum disorder: Learning from court decisions. In M. Fitzgerald (Ed.), Recent advances in autism spectrum disorders (Vol. 2, pp. 157–174). Zagreb: Intech Press.
Freckelton, I., & List, D. (2009). Asperger’s disorder, criminal responsibility and criminal culpability. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 16(1), 16–40. CrossRef
Haskins, B. G., & Silva, J. A. (2006). Asperger’s disorder and criminal behavior: Forensic-psychiatric considerations. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 34(3), 374–384.
Howlin, P. (2004). Autism and asperger syndrome: Preparing for adulthood. London: Routledge.
Kristiansson, M., & Sorman, K. (2008). Autism spectrum disorders: Legal and forensic psychiatric aspects and reflections. Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 5(1), 55–61.
Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.
Murrie, D. C., Warren, J. I., Kristiansson, M., & Dietz, P. E. (2002). Asperger’s syndrome in forensic settings. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1(1), 59–70. CrossRef
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism
Colleen M. Berryessa
- Springer US