Top

Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in:

13-12-2019

Application of the Bifactor S – 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings

Auteurs: G. Leonard Burns, Christian Geiser, Mateu Servera, Stephen P. Becker, Theodore P. Beauchaine

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 7/2020

Abstract

The symmetrical bifactor model is often applied to attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)-hyperactive/impulsive (HI), ADHD-inattentive (IN), and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) symptoms, but this model frequently yields anomalous or inadmissible results. An alternative model, the bifactor S – 1 model, is more appropriate for examining the hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms. Both models were applied to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptom ratings by mothers, fathers, and teachers for 2142 Spanish children (49.49% girls; ages 8–13 years). The symmetrical bifactor model yielded the typical anomalous loadings, with a weakly defined ADHD-HI specific factor and difficult to interpret associations of general and specific factors with correlates. In contrast, the bifactor S – 1 model with ADHD-HI symptoms as general reference factor produced clearly interpretable results. For mothers and fathers, slightly more than 50% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. For teachers, approximately 69% and 39% of true score variance in ADHD-IN and ODD symptoms, respectively, represented specific residual variance not shared with the general ADHD-HI reference factor. The general ADHD-HI reference factor and specific ADHD-IN and ODD residual factors showed convergent and discriminant validity across sources, along with unique associations with peer rejection, social impairment, and academic impairment factors. The bifactor S – 1 model also yielded results consistent with predictions from trait-impulsivity theory of ADHD/ODD development. Researchers should use the bifactor S – 1 model rather than the symmetrical bifactor model if hypotheses involve the latent hierarchical structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms.

volgende artikel Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S - 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Several studies first applied the symmetrical bifactor model to ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptoms and, with anomalous results (i.e., a specific ADHD-HI factor with no factor variance and negative loadings), then switched to a model referred to as an incomplete bifactor model (i.e., no specific factor for hyperactivity symptoms but with specific factors for ADHD-IN, ADHD-impulsivity and ODD symptoms, e.g., Rodenacker et al. 2017, 2018; Ullebø et al. 2012). These studies therefore switched from the fully symmetrical to an incomplete bifactor model without awareness of the interpretational differences between the fully symmetrical and incomplete models (i.e., in these studies the general factor became a general ADHD-hyperactivity reference factor with specific ADHD-IN, ADHD-impulsivity and ODD residual factors in the incomplete bifactor model).

Invariance of like-symptom loadings and like-symptom thresholds occurred for ADHD-HI, ADHD-IN, and ODD symptoms across boys and girls within each source. Boys had significantly (ps < .001) higher factor means than girls on the general ADHD-HI reference factor for mothers, fathers, and teachers (i.e., latent d values: M = .30, SE = .07, M = .40, SE = .07, and M = .58, SE = .10, respectively).

Arias, V. B., Ponce, F. P., & Núñez, D. E. (2018). Bifactor models of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): An evaluation of three necessary but underused psychometric indexes. Assessment, 25, 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116679260. CrossRefPubMed

Beauchaine, T. P. (2015). Future directions in emotion dysregulation and youth psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 44, 875–896. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2015.1038827. CrossRefPubMed

Beauchaine, T. P., & Constantino, J. N. (2017). Redefining the endophenotype concept to accommodate transdiagnostic vulnerabilities and etiological complexity. Biomarkers in Medicine, 11, 769–780. https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2017-0002. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beauchaine, T. P., & McNulty, T. (2013). Comorbidities and continuities as ontogenic processes. Toward a developmental spectrum model of externalizing psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 25, 1505–1528. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000746. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Beauchaine, T. P., Zisner, A., & Sauder, C. L. (2017). Trait impulsivity and the externalizing spectrum. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13, 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-021815-093253. CrossRefPubMed

Becker, S. P., Burns, G. L., Schmitt, A. P., Epstein, J. N., & Tamm, L. (2019). Toward establishing a standard symptom set for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children: Evidence from teacher ratings in a community sample. Assessment, 26, 1128–1141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191117715732. CrossRefPubMed

Burns, G. L., & Becker, S. P. (2019). Sluggish cognitive tempo and ADHD symptoms in a nationally representative sample of U.S. children: Differentiation using categorical and dimensional approaches. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2019.1678165.

Burns, G. L., Lee, S., Servera, M., McBurnett, K., & Becker, S. P. (2015). Child and adolescent behavior inventory–Parent version 1.0. Pullman: Authors.

Burns, G. L., Moura, M. A., Beauchaine, T. P., & McBurnett, K. (2014a). Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms: Predictions of dualpathway/trait-impulsivity etiological models of ADHD. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 55, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12165.

Burns, G. L., Servera, M., Bernard, M., Carrillo, J. M., & Geiser, C. (2014b). Ratings of ADHD symptoms and academic impairment by mothers, fathers, teachers and aides: Construct validity within and across settings as well as occasions. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1247–1258. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000008. CrossRefPubMed

Caspi, A., Houts, R. M., Belsky, D. W., Goldman-Mellor, S. J., Harrington, H., Israel, S., et al. (2014). The p factor: One general psychopathology factor in the structure of psychiatric disorders. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702613497473. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Diamond, A. (2005). Attention deficit disorder (ADHD without hyperactivity): A neurological and behavioral distinct disorder from ADHD (with hypeactivity). Development and Psychopathology, 17, 807-825. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579405050388.

Dishion, T. J. (1990). The peer context of troublesome child and adolescent behavior. In P. E. Leone (Ed.), Understanding troubled and troubling youth: Multiple perspectives (pp. 128–153). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

DuPaul, G. J., Reid, R., Anastopoulos, A. D., Lambert, M. C., Watkins, M. W., & Power, T. J. (2015). Parent and teacher ratings of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms: Factor structure and normative data. Psychological Assessment, 28, 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000166. CrossRefPubMed

Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., & Heene, M. (2017). Anomalous results in G-factor models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 22, 541–562. https://doi.org/10.1037/.met0000083. CrossRefPubMed

Eid, M., Krumm, S., Koch, T., & Schulze, J. (2018). Bifactor models for predicting criteria by general and specific factors: Problems of nonidentifiability and alternative solutions. Journal of Intelligence. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence6030042.

Fair, D. A., Nigg, J. T., Iyer, S., Bathula, D., Mills, K. L., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Milham, M. P. (2013). Distinct neural signatures detected for ADHD subtypes after controlling for micro-movements in resting state functional connectivity MRI data. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 6, 80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2012.00080.

Gatzke-Kopp, L. M., Beauchaine, T. P., Shannon, K. E., Chipman, J., Fleming, A. P., Crowell, S. E., & Aylward, E. (2009). Neurological correlates of reward responding in adolescents with conduct disorder and/or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118, 203–213.

Geiser, C., Bishop, J., & Lockhart, G. (2015). Collapsing factors in multitrait-multimethod models: Examining consequences of a mismatch between measurement design and model. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00946. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Heinrich, M., Zagorscak, P., Eid, M., & Knaevelsrud, C. (2018). Giving G a meaning: An application of the bifactor-(S-1) approach to realize a more symptom-oriented modeling of the Beck Depression Inventory–II. Assessment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191118803738.2016.1144192.

Holzinger, K., & Swineford, F. (1937). The bi-factor method. Psychometrika, 2, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02287965. CrossRef

Lee, S. Y., Burns, G. L., Beauchaine, T. P., & Becker, S. P. (2016). Bifactor latent structure of ADHD/ODD symptoms and the first-order latent structure of sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms. Psychological Assessment, 28, 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000232.

Martel, M. M., Gremillion, M., Roberts, B., von Eye, A., & Nigg, J. T. (2010). The structure of childhood disruptive behaviors. Psychological Assessment, 22, 816–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020975. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McDonough-Caplan, H. M., & Beauchaine, T. P. (2018). Conduct disorder: A neurodevelopmental perspective. In M. M. Martel (Ed.), Developmental pathways to disruptive, impulse-control, and conduct disorders (pp. 53–89). Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.

Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of the bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rodenacker, K., Hautmann, C., Görtz-Dorten, A., & Döpfner, M. (2016). Bifactor models show a superior fit: Examination of the factorial validity of parent-reported and self-reported symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorders in children and adolescents. Psychopathology, 49, 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1159/000442295. CrossRefPubMed

Rodenacker, K., Hautmann, C., Görtz-Dorten, A., & Döpfner, M. (2017). The factor structure of ADHD—different models, analyses, and informants in a bifactor framework. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 39, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-016-9565-7. CrossRef

Rodenacker, K., Hautmann, C., Görtz-Dorten, A., & Döpfner, M. (2018). Evidence for the trait-impulsivity etiological models in a clinical sample: Bifactor structure and its relation to impairment and environmental risk. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 659–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0329-y. CrossRefPubMed

Sáez, B., Servera, M., Becker, S. P., & Burns, G. L. (2018). Optimal items for assessing sluggish cognitive tempo in children across mother, father, and teacher ratings. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 48, 825–839.

Servera, M., Sáez, B., Burns, G. L., & Becker, S. P. (2018). Clinical differentiation of sluggish cognitive tempo and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in children. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 127, 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000375. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ullebø, A. K., Breivik, K., Gillberg, C., Lundervold, A. J., & Posserud, M. B. (2012). The factor structure of ADHD in a general population of primary school children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 53, 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02549.x. CrossRefPubMed

Watts, A. L., Poore, H. E., & Waldman, I. D. (2019). Risker tests of the validity of the bifactor model of psychopathology. Clinical Psychological Science: Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702619855035.

Willcutt, E. G., Nigg, J. T., Pennington, B. F., Solanto, M. V., Rohde, L. A., Tannock, R., . . . Lahey, B. B. (2012). Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027347.

Titel: Application of the Bifactor S – 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings
Auteurs: G. Leonard Burns
Christian Geiser
Mateu Servera
Stephen P. Becker
Theodore P. Beauchaine
Publicatiedatum: 13-12-2019
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 7/2020
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00608-4

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Application of the Bifactor S – 1 Model to Multisource Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: an Appropriate Bifactor Model for Symptom Ratings

Abstract

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Tips voor Mijn BSL

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2020

Multi-Faceted Constructs in Abnormal Psychology: Implications of the Bifactor S - 1 Model for Individual Clinical Assessment

The Bifactor S-1 Model: a Psychometrically Sounder Alternative to Test the Structure of ADHD and ODD?

Applying the Bifactor S-1 Model to Ratings of ADHD/ODD Symptoms: A Commentary on Burns et al. (2019) and a Re-Analysis

Sad Dads and Troubled Tots: Protective Factors Related to the Stability of Paternal Depression and Early Childhood Internalizing Problems

Parental Presence Impacts a Neural Correlate of Anxiety (the Late Positive Potential) in 5–7 Year Old Children: Interactions with Parental Sensitivity to Child Anxiety

Promises and Pitfalls of Latent Variable Approaches to Understanding Psychopathology: Reply to Burke and Johnston, Eid, Junghänel and Colleagues, and Willoughby